my reference list wrote:Xite91
ShiftyWhip CSL Xite91
VasudeVa
Scott Brosius
Hinduragi
Tazaro ConfidAnon TheLonging
Charlie
NicolBolas iiiiiiq bv310 NicolBolas
Andrius
vollkan
Twomz
RayFrost Friend
Parama
Tasky
Sando - The Mascot - Vanilla Student - Expelled Period One
PranaDevil - The Quarterback - Vanilla Student - Expelled Passing Period One
vezokpiraka
ReaperCharlie Seraphim
- The Band Member - Vanilla Student - Expelled Period Two
Max - The Head Cheerleader - Vanilla Student - Expelled Passing Period Two
Up to page 3: Vollkan's analysis (coupled with PranaDevil's) show good reasoning when discussing about popularity levels. Parama slot (Tasky) made a seriously mind boggling vote in #52. Following this is Twomz's slot (Friend) counter vote, which I feel is justified at #55. Parama slot self votes (This is horrible IMHO). Towards the end of page 3 there is low-quality discussion. More noise than actual content.
Page 4: Cue entry of Hinduragi's slot (TheLonging). He throws some questions, that's fine. As for the rest of the page, I don't know whether I should laugh or cry -- the exchange is quite silly.
Page 5: Reading Parama's slot #100 as disingenuous. Some ideas, bad implementation (aka likely coming from mafia). Vollkan argues his points better (than Parama's slot, Xite91). Goodposting from Xite
#109. Enter Max, with ideas.
Page 6: Not really understanding Xite's #126 when she says Twomz's slot is scummy. Weak argument; unconvincing. In the exchange between Xite and Twomz's slot, Twomz's slot comes out better. LOL @ #138! I echo #139 at this point. Enter Sando. At the end of the page, I can't find Parama's slot to be convincing anymore: the previous statements he made have conferred some degree of bias to my analysis. I usually start ignoring these players to some degree; and I'm going to do that now. Maybe even a vote at this point (Vote: Parama)
Page 7: #150 is a succinct "backing-off" post by Parama's slot. For this, I would keep this point in the back of my head as townie behavior. Not too bad as it dilutes the previous badposting. Xite's
#156 is rife with emotion; making analysis difficult and (usually) inaccurate. I would agree with most others at this point that vollkan is pro-town. Parama's slot posts at the bottom of the page remains unimpressive.
From what I read, Parama's slot isn't the best casemaker, but he can certainly "work with" others quite okay when asked directly (answering questions, explaining line of thinking). Initially looks mafia, later look town and posts strange things (#174). Such a roller coaster type of personality.
Page 8: Forced a defense from Parama's slot at L-1. Can't say I really like the defense, but it has some quirks in it and the follow up early page 9. Enter VasudeVa.
Page 9: VasudeVa's points system is interesting, but rather generic. The rest of his opinions are okay. Echo #207, but I'm going to say Xite's been way too emotional in her posting. This is distracting. Twomz's slot shifted his vote again: seems too often for my liking; mildly suspicious behavior IMHO. Twomz's slot fullclaimed at
#220 and (surprisingly) there is little to no evidence of typical "flailing" behavior. Logic says he's mafia; gut says he's overly expressive townie.
Max's
#221 is a big one, but provides some insight on players. I agree on a lot of points; especially when he points out the lurkier players.
Page 10: At this point, Parama's slot is at L-1.
Skipping ahead, I'd like to say a slew of replacements and distractions made this wagon collapse like a pile of matchsticks. Nothing impressive happens; stalling and lousy posts interfere as time goes by. Regardless, I'll get to reading them anyway.
Twomz's slot
#225 reads as townish for line of questioning. He also explains his vote with good reasons. Parama's slot defense (again) at
#228 has unimpressive holes in it but at the same time I can't shake the feeling that this is not "flailing" behavior. A tough decision; but if it were a deadline and a lynch between Parama's slot and no lynch, lynch is the way to go. Xite's posting is also emotional here.
-----------
Separating post here.