Before Chaim jumps on this bandwagon because CP seems to have made some valid points, let's actually take a closer look at his points shall we? If it sounds like I'm taking it as a joke, it's because I am.
Catterpillar wrote:Wait a second,
reading neverminds iso has prompted me to look at neil's iso again
,
We interrupt this programming to ask you a question...
What???
You may now return to your local broadcasting system.
Catterpillar wrote:he mentions looking at the possible setups in his iso #1 (which is also where the misunderstanding of RVS comes in) this seems rather inconsistent with his current misunderstanding of how the setup works.
So much wrong information here, I don't even know where to begin. Are you referring to my first post? I'm pretty sure you mean after the "/confirm" one, in which case confuses me. I never mentioned any setup, nor did I mention RVS, nor did anything I say have anything to do with my current "misunderstanding" of how the setup works. I'll admit, my misunderstanding now that I've read over the main post, that there could be a doctor and a cop. I didn't think that was possible as it'd be uneven. But I guess not. So I have understanding now, thank you oh wise one for correcting me. (Silver, you're rubbing off on me. lol) But again, the only thing I mentioned was realizing there were two mafias... not much for you to go on, that is unless you like to LEAP for information, under which is not usually a townie thing to do. Not claiming your scum, just your reasoning well... well.... I can't think of a nice way to put it. It stinks.
Catterpillar wrote:neil wrote:where did I look to out a power role? I've looked into RVS now and again, I'm not fond of it. And I don't know if you noticed, but my vote is ON the person I think is acting the most scummiest. So maybe you should recheck your facts. Also, how am I "throwing my vote around"? Example please? Last time I checked, I've only voted on two people (though I could be wrong.)
You quote this post, but then the information in which you supply the town as to why I could possibly be scum, has absolutely nothing to do with this post. You said I said something about a cop, yet in the post you quoted, there's nothing in that about a cop. In fact, what I actually said was (to my defense after I made a statement about a cop), I figured there'd be a cop in this game, I still will follow my gut and say there is. The scum can look every which way until they're blue in the face for all I care, it doesn't mean they're going to be any closer to figuring out who the cop is, then we will be figuring out who they are?
Catterpillar wrote:I count you making six votes two of which are you switching from one person to another and then back to the first or voting someone, unvoting them only to switch back.
Well, I suppose the only fair thing to do is count now isn't it? (1st vote - Silverbullet. 2nd vote - Ups. 3rd Vote - Raz. 4th Vote - Ups. 5th Vote - Raz. "6th Vote" where I restated my vote on Raz.
Now that you've given us this information, let's actually digest what we can get from this.
Neil has voted for 3 people this whole game, two in which from his 3rd post in the game, he's had on his watch list and the other he's already admitting to making a mistake. So now I must ask, with your (now evident) useless information that you just brought to the table trying to make a case against me, what exactly were you trying to say? Besides Silver, which I didn't count for obvious reasons, if anything this further PROVED what I said to you, yet you used it as though it was some form of suspicion against me? That's not exactly town play, twisting things to make them seem untrue. Unlike Raz when he stated that against me though, I've actually shown you the post that does this, at least from my point of view.
Catterpillar wrote:I'm not sure where I noticed you being reluctant about voting someone who you thought was scummiest but I am sure I noticed it until I find the relevant post (which won't be till I finish the other isos) consider this point void.
What's the point of saying this, only to say "consider this void" at the end? That's like me saying, "YOU ARE A WOMAN! Even though, we all know you are a man so forget about this post..." It doesn't make any sense, and it looks as though your once again trying to "look as though your submitting good information to the town" when in reality, you're post so far has been evidence-less, and useless to the town.
Catterpillar wrote:At the moment I will be voting neil as soon as I've finished the isos if I don't think someone else is scummier
Still have yet to see a single evidence you have against me to being scum? If anything, you've 1. Stretched the truth. 2. Were deceitful with your phrasing and with the layout of your posts. 3. Tried to blindside the town by bringing up an old point, maybe trying to get the town off of a current subject they were on? 4. Made an accusation with no evidence, no proof, not even a hint of a scumtell. If anything, the only thing you proved is that you could very well be a scum appearing to be scumhunting with no real meat behind your words.... I'm not even going to accuse you of being scum, as I believe it's more of a bias. You come in, see someone being bold and speaking out, and obviously your first instinct is to follow the crowd. The crowd that was posting at several points of this game, has used my name plenty of times. It seems like it'd be easy to form a case out of nothing when there's so much content to "misquote" or "misanalyze" like mine. Cocky? No, arrogant? Not in the least bit. Confident? Indeed.
On another note, man you people do it way different then us Americans. "Spiking at a tea party" made me laugh. Cultures these days...
You get points for that one from me, for sure!
