For reasons already explained, I'm not sure that I'm so in favor of CA. Personally, I'm torn between VRK and AGM.
I think it's more likely to be VRK. Reasons later, but read my posts from yesterday.
This post happens at the beginning of D2. And by beginning, I mean the very first day of D2. And for the entirety of D2, CA never really wavers from this belief. Now I know what you're going to say; Zach was just as jumpy at G&H. However, I find the belief that 2 scum were bussing each other very unlikely.ConfidAnon wrote:Iso'd everyone.
Zachrulez and Good and Honest don't look so hot.
Good and Honest needs to answer the question presented to him by Hoopla, and I don't understand why he wouldn't participate in the mass claim.
However, this is could easily be weirdness with playstyle, while Zachrulez is fairly scummy. Lots of fluffy one-liners, hopping between the AlmasterGM and drmyshottyizsik wagons, and eventually "mistakenly hammering" Elleran.
Vote: Zachrulez
redtail wrote:Please, break apart my logic.
AlmasterGM wrote:As I've said repeatedly, I'll lynch Zach or Good and Honest.
redtail wrote:However, I find the belief that 2 scum were bussing each other very unlikely.
redtail wrote:For reasons already explained, I'm not sure that I'm so in favor of CA. Personally, I'm torn between VRK andAGM.
Ok that interpretation makes sense, but it also seems like someone is trying too hard to clear himself. Gut is telling me that CA would be rather foolish for pointing this out, seeing as helping KKN's case along does nothing but put eyes on him after I've been lynched. This is tangential evidence, but it's another point in CA-Town's favor. KKN is the last scum.ConfidAnon wrote:I think KKN is going off the Tracker results where he didn't visit anyone.
If the only scum remaining are GH and KKN, and GH doesn't vote, then KKN couldn't be scum because he didn't visit, and there was a kill.
I want to read some things when I have more time, but if I had to vote right now it would be for VRK.
I never said anything about throwing or not throwing votes around. Before today, you've voted TWICE, hopping on a late AGM wagon for the first one on Day 1. For your 2nd vote, you voted for G&H, a known scum. TheKid Know Nothing wrote:To be fair, the first post I made did say "Sticking with what I said yesterday" right after the vote.
The point is, if G&H wouldn't send in the vote and if in your eyes, I am scum, how would that kill have gone through? I still really don't understand your case against me. From what I read yesterday, you find me scummy for my unwillingness to throw my vote around and for interactions with Zach, correct?
What on earth are you talking about? Zach never even VOTED for ConfidAnon, he voted for ME. Multiple times. And G&H never voted, so how could he have "bussed?"redtail896 wrote:You weren't bussed as hard by Zach and G&H though. And anyway, you're just leading me to the conclusion that VRK is the last scum.
More on KKN later today; I have class to go to.
You're right about Zach, but G&H I surmise from reading his posts. It's very clear that G&H was insinuating a connection between Zach and CA.AlmasterGM wrote:What on earth are you talking about? Zach never even VOTED for ConfidAnon, he voted for ME. Multiple times. And G&H never voted, so how could he have "bussed?"redtail896 wrote:You weren't bussed as hard by Zach and G&H though. And anyway, you're just leading me to the conclusion that VRK is the last scum.
More on KKN later today; I have class to go to.
Kid Know Nothing wrote:VRK, why do you think CA is town?
CA, where are you?
I'm addressing your case right now, so give me a little bit.