Moderator:
Also, Most of you won't survive.
Neil1113 ((
Zachrulez (IC)
Mod wrote:
You are a normal townsperson, trying to make a living and survive this insanity.Please Confirm by sending me a PM that says /confirm and your role name
- You have no abilities at Night other than getting a good night's rest.
- Although you do not have any special abilities, your voice and vote are powerful weapons in their own right. Use them to your best advantage!
- At no time may you privately communicate with any other player.
- You win when all the Mafia players are gone, whether you survive to the end or not.
Mod wrote:Cop:
You are the local law enforcement, and can tell the good guys from the bad.Please Confirm by sending me a PM that says /confirm and your role name
- Each NIGHT, you may send the moderator a PM with your choice of player that you want to investigate.
- The Moderator will inform you as to that persons guilt or innocence.
- At no time may you privately communicate with any other player.
- In a Newbie game, you will always get a correct result (no sanity issues).
- You win when all the Mafia players are gone, whether you survive to the end or not.
Mod wrote:
You are the local physician, and can protect people from harm.Please Confirm by sending me a PM that says /confirm and your role name
- Each NIGHT, you may send the moderator a PM with your choice of player that you want to protect.
- If someone attempts to kill that player during the Night, they will be spared.
- You may not protect yourself.
- At no time may you privately communicate with any other player.
- In a Newbie game, your protection target will always live through the night (no quacks).
- You win when all the Mafia players are gone, whether you survive to the end or not.
Mod wrote:Goon:
You are part of the local mafia along with your partner (PLayername) who is a (Partner Role here).Please Confirm by sending me a PM that says /confirm and your role name
- During the day, try to blend in with the town and atttempt to mislynch someone.
- During the night cycle ONLY. You may talk in this quicktopic with your partner to discuss the strategy, kill and such. (Quicktopic).
- Either you, or your partner, may send in the kill via pm by using the format
Kill:Player.
- Both of the Mafia may talk in the quicktopic before the day starts during what is known as, Night 0. As soon as it is day though, you may not talk at all.
- You win when the Mafia outnumber the town, or nothing can prevent the same. Whether you survive to the end or not.
Mod wrote:
You are part of the local Mafia along with your partner (PlayerName) who is a Goon.Please Confirm by sending me a PM that says /confirm and your role name
- During the Day, try and blend in with the Town and attempt to mislynch someone.
- During the night cycle ONLY, you may talk with your partner in this quicktopic. (Quicktopic)
- Being a Roleblocker, you may choose someone to not be able to use their night ability. Assuming they actually have a night ability.
- During the night, when you and your partner have made a desicion, one of you PMs me the Kill. You the Mafia Roleblocker, send me who you want blocked in the format of
Block:Player. Be specific on whether it is the kill or the Roleblock.
- Before the game starts feel free to talk in the quicktopic to discuss an opening strategy. This is called Night 0. But as soon as it is Day, you may no longer speak in the topic till the next night.
- You win when the Mafia outnumber the town or nothing can prevent the same. Whether you survive to the end or not.
Scum will try to get someone killed, asking for a bandwagon seams to be a good way for that.boberz wrote:Why do you think scum would do what I have done? WHat si the logic behind it?
Thank you.boberz post is very weird.
Not that in the dark really. He is scum after all.you're voting someone in the dark
From what do you infer that I have a hidden motive. Or are you just saying that to justify what you just said? Any evidence of this?leaded by a hidden motive
Why is this worse? In fact why on earth is this bad. He is scum I made a pretty good case considering it is early game, people should join me.even worst is that you ask people to join the bandwagon
But I asked him why it was scummy and he couldnt answer. So he didnt really find it funny, he was just a bit suprised I did something other than random vote and assumed it was scummy. It was not.Rydonmower is voting for boberz because he thinks his reason for the voting is overreacting and he finds the "join the wagon", in his words, "extremely, extremely scummy behaviour". I find this to be logic and justified, despite that we have little information and not all people have posted yet, so this can also be wrong. We'll see... for now i'm holding my vote, waiting for everyone to speak up.
Cop out.for now i'm holding my vote, waiting for everyone to speak up.
I would say "your welcome" but i'm not really sure why you're thanking me. To me buddying is also a scum tell.boberz wrote:Thank you.boberz post is very weird.
You can't know that for sure.boberz wrote:Not that in the dark really. He is scum after all.you're voting someone in the dark
Saying someone is mafia is not true just because you say it. Other votes might been or not random, but yours is not. You thinking someone is scum doesn't actually makes them scum.boberz wrote:From what do you infer that I have a hidden motive. Or are you just saying that to justify what you just said? Any evidence of this?leaded by a hidden motive
Once again you're assuming you're right and you can't be sure of that, unless you're scum or the cop.boberz wrote:Why is this worse? In fact why on earth is this bad. He is scum I made a pretty good case considering it is early game, people should join me.even worst is that you ask people to join the bandwagon
It can be true, but i just can't accept your word for it. After all if your scum you'll be trying to trick me.boberz wrote:So he didnt really find it funny, he was just a bit suprised I did something other than random vote and assumed it was scummy. It was not.
This is also so wrong... if you're town and you have spoted the Cop (and i'm not) you should have kept that information for yourself.boberz wrote:Cop out.for now i'm holding my vote, waiting for everyone to speak up.
Hokay, first off, it is a random vote, for reasons I explained above.boberz wrote:So he roled a dice and it coincidentally landed on me, the player who he has played with before. I think not. Even if the vote looks silly there is motive behind it, there is nothing random in a random vote unless a random event is used to determine it, making the whole process pointless.
... There was no thought behind that vote. It was a silly jab at Zachrulez's username, nothing more.boberz wrote:Zdenek's vote is just another example of a vote that looks random but in actual fact there was some kind of thought behind it. It is not random. SO it deserves to be analysed.
Okay, perhaps 'Carry on' wasn't the best phrase to use. I was suggesting we get on with the game, instead of getting stuck on trivial matters like what constitutes a random vote. But then you accuse me of 'attempting to stifle discussion?boberz wrote:And how dare you say carry on. That is as much your responsibility as anyone elses. That is clearly an attempt to stifle discussion.
Hm? I thought I did a pretty good job of explaining why it was scummy. I had no comment regarding andrew's vote, but I did explain my reasoning behind your (likely scummy) use of bandwagoning.gaulamos wrote:Rydonmower is voting for boberz because he thinks his reason for the voting is overreacting and he finds the "join the wagon", in his words, "extremely, extremely scummy behaviour". I find this to be logic and justified, despite that we have little information and not all people have posted yet, so this can also be wrong. We'll see... for now i'm holding my vote, waiting for everyone to speak up.
But I asked him why it was scummy and he couldnt answer. So he didnt really find it funny, he was just a bit suprised I did something other than random vote and assumed it was scummy. It was not.
Actually, I think boberz was accusing you of 'copping out', as in avoiding the issue at hand. I don't think he was referring to the role at all.gaulamos wrote:This is also so wrong... if you're town and you have spoted the Cop (and i'm not) you should have kept that information for yourself.boberz wrote:Cop out.gaulamos wrote:for now i'm holding my vote, waiting for everyone to speak up.
Revealing roles are only helpfull to the mafia, not to the town.
Also i don't see anything wrong in waiting for people to come on and post.
Well there is something wrong. You are hedging your bets, not prepard to make a decision or a mistake. Sounds like a scum mentality to me.Also i don't see anything wrong in waiting for people to come on and post.
Wagon me to find out if I am lying then. You wont do anything sitting there paranoid.It can be true, but i just can't accept your word for it. After all if your scum you'll be trying to trick me.
Stop talking about the cop. And whether right or wrong you should join me on the wagon, or wagon me.Once again you're assuming you're right and you can't be sure of that, unless you're scum or the cop.
Not many players use random number generators and those who do are wrong. So very few votes are random imo. Me thinking someone is scummy does make them worth a wagon though. Unless you are too scared of me finding out who is who.Saying someone is mafia is not true just because you say it. Other votes might been or not random, but yours is not. You thinking someone is scum doesn't actually makes them scum.
Tis you who complimented me so you are the guilty party.I would say "your welcome" but i'm not really sure why you're thanking me. To me buddying is also a scum tell.
No, but I am a fair bit more sure than anyone else atm.You can't know that for sure.
1/ WIFOM (circular logic leading to nowhere)Okay, perhaps 'Carry on' wasn't the best phrase to use. I was suggesting we get on with the game, instead of getting stuck on trivial matters like what constitutes a random vote. But then you accuse me of 'attempting to stifle discussion?
1. If I were scum, attempting to stifle discussion would probably be picked out pretty quick, therefore, I would not do it.
2. The phrase 'Carry on' conveys that we should move on into more discussion, not stifling anything.
Bandwagoning isnt scummy. You said why you thought it might be, but then I contradicted you and asked you for logic regarding why it might be scummy. You failed to explain this.Hm? I thought I did a pretty good job of explaining why it was scummy. I had no comment regarding andrew's vote, but I did explain my reasoning behind your (likely scummy) use of bandwagoning.
lolIn the meantime, I have to say my suspicions on boberz have been set in stone. I highly doubt I'll be changing my vote before lynching time.