2) Then that's not tunneling, which was a word I saw specifically IIRC (which was why I responded to it). Also, I gave you the benefit of the doubt when this game began, by saying, "oh, it's probably just his playstyle" but as the game progressed, I can be almost positive that you deserve no benefit of the doubt.
I said "any" benefit of the doubt. That's important. I am not attacking you for not subjecting me to strict scrutiny. My point has been consistently that you are attacking me because my actions could conceivably have a scum motivation, without proving that it is
likely
that they do (ie. that the scum explanatoin is better than any town one).
3) So.... it's different for you than it is for everybody else?
No. Where I have attacked people, it has been for actions that I consider unreasonable (ie. that a townie acting reasonably would be unlikely to do them). I have not attacked people because there is the possiblity that their actions are scum-motivated.
Hinduragi wrote: 1. Do we have any idea of the numbers on the scum team?
It's a mini, so (conservatively assuming worst-case-scenario) it will be 3.
2. Are we at MyLo?
If you assume 3 scum, then yes.
3. Why are we voting NL?
With 3 scum, the setup at the moment is most likely 5:3 (ie. 5 townies, 3 scum).
If we mislynch, it becomes 4:3. Plus scum's NK, it becomes 3:3, which is a loss.
If we No Lynch, it stays 5:3 and then scum's NK makes it 4:3, the difference being that we then have more info coming from the person's death (and possibly power roles)
).