Mini 1038 - Inception (Day One Archive)

manho · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:25 pm

first to be here.

vote: Tuberkulos

for haven't played a game with me.

manho · Post Post #16 (isolation #1) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 1:31 am

Chronopie wrote:Is this a bastard game? Will lynching the mod do anything for us? That is the Question.

--

Premature Setup Speculation time!!11!!!

If we have a Vig/SK, it's probably Mal, the shade
Eames, the forger, may be InvImmune.
Nash, The (first) Architect, may be a traitor or Usurper
Arthur, The Pointman, may be an investigative role.
Yusuf, The Chemist, may be a protective role.

Wikipedia link here

stop the setup speculation.

manho · Post Post #19 (isolation #2) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:02 am

ooba wrote:
Vote: BloodCovenent

Serious vote. I wonder why Tuberkulos and chronopie are afraid to vote someone who they think is scummy.

why is BC scummy?

manho · Post Post #21 (isolation #3) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:59 am

Chronopie wrote:
manho wrote:
ooba wrote:
Vote: BloodCovenent

Serious vote. I wonder why Tuberkulos and chronopie are afraid to vote someone who they think is scummy.
why is BC scummy?
This. You be putting words in my mouth. I don't find a page 1 mod-vote scummy. Hell, I've done it myself on occasion.

FoS: Ooba

why don't you vote ooba for that?

vote: ooba

manho · Post Post #24 (isolation #4) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:48 am

unvote, vote: anon

manho · Post Post #32 (isolation #5) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:03 pm

Seraphim wrote:
Vote: Manho

I find his revote back into the RVS to be the scummiest thing that's happened so far all game.

i find ooba's reaction not from scum, so i unvoted.

manho · Post Post #37 (isolation #6) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:48 pm

Seraphim wrote:yes but then you voted Anon. Why?

random.

manho · Post Post #39 (isolation #7) » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:10 pm

AlmasterGM wrote:manho smells like lies. The ooba vote was followed by a quote. Calling it random is a non-sequitor - what was the quote there for, shits and giggles?

Unvote. Vote: manho

random is for the anon vote. the ooba vote is for his "putting word in chrono's mouth", but i then understand it, and unvoted.

manho · Post Post #47 (isolation #8) » Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:46 am

ooba wrote:ebwop: I missed a "a" in there .. "I am a Miller".

is that missing "a" really matter?

manho · Post Post #61 (isolation #9) » Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:51 pm

unvote, vote: chrono

manho · Post Post #69 (isolation #10) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:16 am

ooba wrote:I think we now have 4 days to deadline ..

Unvote. Vote: BC

we have this short day???

manho · Post Post #73 (isolation #11) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:14 am

3 days from deadline?

unvote, vote: BC

manho · Post Post #79 (isolation #12) » Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:07 pm

Anon wrote:BC is acceptable but the play is Chronopie. I want EVERYONE's opinions on him in neext post, please.

i think chrono is scummier than BC, but we need to settle on a lynch quick.

manho · Post Post #88 (isolation #13) » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:28 pm

Data wrote:
@Manho:
I require your opinions on all players. Now.

AlmasterGM: neutral to town
Anon: neutral to scum
BloodCovenent: neutral to scum, but need to die due to deadline
bv310: inactive
Chronopie: scummy but fit his general meta
Data: can't read due to playstyle
Iecerint: inactive
ooba: town
Seraphim: inactive
Switz: inactive
Tuberkulos: neutral to scum

manho · Post Post #148 (isolation #14) » Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:14 pm

vote: chrono

, scum won't counterclaim someone who had said his role is pretty useless, and that chrono is always a good lynch.

manho · Post Post #163 (isolation #15) » Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:50 am

unvote, vote: no lynch

we should have another day to figure out what's happening here.

EBWOP

unvote, vote: bv

i change my mind and that bv may be the stupid scum counterclaiming. i don't think there is enough time to hammer bv, so you can basically treat it as a no lynch.