MagnaofIllusion (1) -
RedCoyote (0) -
danakillsu (0) -
Jack (1) -
Haschel Cedricson (0) -
jelly jiggler (1) -
XScorpion (2) -
Stef (3) -
imaginality (0) -
mykonian (0) -
DavidParker (1) -
Not Voting (2) -
It seems like you're beating a dead horse here, and it's sounding dangerously close to, "Why me?" What do you hope to get out of mykonian?HC 59 wrote:That's a fair enough point, but your vote on me makes no logical sense. I've never played with XScorpion before and I know absolutely nothing about him. Also, if you honestly believe that a wagon on XScorpion was scummy, wouldn't it make sense to vote for one of the people who turned it into a random wagon?
I suspect it's because he didn't "figure out" whatever it is that made you and mykonian look good in his eyes. I suspect he was wanting XScorp to sing your praises as well.Jack 60 wrote:Why did he put xscorp on there, I can't tell.
Well, y'all must have different meta with XScorp than I do. In both games I've played with him he's been tough as nails, although it took him a while to warm up in the first. I get the opposite impression from him at the moment. That is, he's a more difficult lynch than, say, Antihero or dana, which seem like they may roll over more easily.mykonian 61 wrote:Don't want to insult you scorpion. It probably has already become a selffulfilling profecy that you are an easy lynch
Hmmm...Mod 98 wrote:Scum may NOT pass the Vigilante Ability to their partners. This is not a change in the setup or mechanic, it has been in effect since the beginning, but I missed it in the Special Section. My apologies.
Seems like the power would be randomized if this were the case.Jack 99 wrote:Because if they did they would pass it to a townie and kill that townie...well the rule is a bit confusing, but there is still no way scum started with it.
RedCoyote wrote:Well, y'all must have different meta with XScorp than I do. In both games I've played with him he's been tough as nails,although it took him a while to warm up in the first.I get the opposite impression from him at the moment. That is, he's a more difficult lynch than, say, Antihero or dana, which seem like they may roll over more easily.
I felt it was odd for mykonian to say that he found a bandwagon on XScorpion suspicious while placing his vote on the first person to vote XScorpion in the RVS instead of one of the people who turned it into an actual wagon, especially when one of the voters specifically said they were voting in order to create a bandwagon. I was looking for an explanation, and I got it. It's irrelevant that I was the person who got voted for.imaginality wrote:Hi all. Long [expletive deleted day]. I'll reread this properly tomorrow. For now from recent posts I'm not liking HC's response to RC's question, the implication seeming to be that the response he wanted was for mykonian to stop voting him, which if true seems over-cautious.
VOTE: Haschel Cedricson
Were you looking for any other response from mykonian than for him to remove his vote from you? If so what?
no, it is on someone who selfvotes, has been a reasonable player further and has already made attempts to get the town discussing.XScorpion wrote:Nah, I like my vote now. It's on someone who is definitely being anti-town.
But actually isn't! Oh wait ... what?mykonian wrote:@ dana. It isn't the scummiest vote so far. That has been stef's vote on Xscorpion, which seems to be supported by evidence, but actually isn't!
So... you apologize for not asking what my reasons were for voting for you. Nice. Liking my vote. Also, OMGUS rocks!xScorp wrote: Sorry bout that, I still have to wash the bad taste of Open 231 out of my mouth. I sometimes forget that people might actually answer me when I ask them why they're voting...
What?Stef wrote:So... you apologize for not asking what my reasons were for voting for you. Nice. Liking my vote. Also, OMGUS rocks!xScorp wrote:Sorry bout that, I still have to wash the bad taste of Open 231 out of my mouth. I sometimes forget that people might actually answer me when I ask them why they're voting...
Ok, Jack. Just a word of advise and caution: first, that doesn't keep you from generating information. Posting might help you there. It works as a decent smokescreen for holding back information (at least during day 1). And I wouldn't keep it up much longer, as people are going to hate you when you did figure out who was scum but got killed N1 without telling the rest who actually were scum.Jack wrote:I feel like keeping my cards close to my chest for a while, experimental thing.
This is stef generating a case while he is already voting xscorp. Again, scumhunting the wrong way around (town first makes a case, then votes. Scum pressures the townie, then makes the case based on reactions)Antihero wrote:What?Stef wrote:So... you apologize for not asking what my reasons were for voting for you. Nice. Liking my vote. Also, OMGUS rocks!xScorp wrote:Sorry bout that, I still have to wash the bad taste of Open 231 out of my mouth. I sometimes forget that people might actually answer me when I ask them why they're voting...
My was because I don't follow Stef's argument (where's the scumtell?).mykonian wrote:This is stef generating a case while he is already voting xscorp. Again, scumhunting the wrong way around (town first makes a case, then votes. Scum pressures the townie, then makes the case based on reactions)Antihero wrote:What?Stef wrote:So... you apologize for not asking what my reasons were for voting for you. Nice. Liking my vote. Also, OMGUS rocks!xScorp wrote:Sorry bout that, I still have to wash the bad taste of Open 231 out of my mouth. I sometimes forget that people might actually answer me when I ask them why they're voting...
theory
OMGUS is the acronym used for a vote which has no reason other then that the person you vote voted you.
In this case, Stef voted scorp without any reason, while pretending to have them.
Scorp votes Steffor having no reasons for his vote.
Scorps vote on stef is therefor legitimate, while Stef's accusation that scorps vote is OMGUS is wrong.
Here you are lying again.You don't even bother telling people why you did vote scorpion. (actually, you have no reasons.