Mini #1007 (Game Over)
-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
VRK is almost certainly number one. A more thorough case against him will probably be forthcoming, but the general outline is as above.
Number 2 is a bit trickier though. All of my major suspects have huge strikes against them. I guess that I tentatively have to go with Almaster. You (and others) already noted his quick switch from Zach to Elleran on D1. I see no problem with Zach's quick vote on Almaster d1 (after mine and AGar's); he probably saw our bandwagon as relatively weak, and wanted to get on it before it fell apart to separate himself from AGM. The biggest problem with AGM is his quick insistence on lynching Zach yesterday. I am willing to chalk this up to extreme bussing if AGM figured that Zach would be the lynch anyway. (For the record, I consider his venom against G&H interesting, but more of a null tell)
However, AGM gets interesting when we look at VRK. AGM and VRK have little real contact, despite both being relatively active members of the game. VRK has usually viewed AGM as very townie (with the odd exception of his post voting for Almaster (which I believe at the time was a relatively safe vote)). AGM alternates between seeing VRK as kinda scummy and townie enough to lynch G&H over him (along with KKN). So I find this interaction suspicious.
I'd also like to state that my AGM suspicion is much weaker than my VRK suspicion.
Would I be willing to lynch outside of those 2? Potentially yes, if presented with a good argument.You can just call me Redtail. If I could, I'd change my name to that anyway.-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
gonnano Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 372
- Joined: March 27, 2010
- Location: USA
I don't want to interfere with this interview, but I did want to point out that this is more a VRK point than anything, because VRK hasn't had much real contact with a lot of people.AGM and VRK have little real contactSome men are born mediocre, some achieve mediocrity, and some have mediocrity thrust upon them.
- Joseph Heller-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
I admit to stretching my AGM suspicion. My other larger suspicion is CA, but that suffers from the point of view of my VRK suspicion. VRK wanted to shift Zach to CA, which makes no sense if they are scumbuddies.
I agree that AGM would've wanted to shift the Zachrulez wagon. It's possible that he simply wrote Zach off, and wanted to pick up town points. I agree that it's a major, possibly debilitating, sticking point. However, what do you think of the other elements of my suspicion?
Preview Edit: This is true. If you think that this is a hole in my anti-VRK slant, then please say so. As I've said, my AGM suspicion is much weaker than my VRK one.You can just call me Redtail. If I could, I'd change my name to that anyway.-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
So, red. I think it's time for me to admit, I've got ulterior motives for wanting this one-on-one interview. Initially I spruiked the idea of wanting to engage in a conversation, just for the benefit of breaking the routine of endless paragraphs back and forth. But the real reason I've done this, is because I've got information against you, and I didn't want to give you too much time to tailor a response to it and think about all the consequences.
I'm a gunsmith. Now, tell me why you own a gun.-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
Hoopla
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
I DON'T OWN A GUN.
Now, my interesting question is why you got a false positive. Because I don't think this is a scum gambit on your part Hoopla; it would be an odd time for one. I can imagine 3 reasons that you got a false gun on me.
1. There exists a bus driver. I find this unlikely; my understanding is that bus drivers are generally considered bastard roles.
2. I'm some sort of gun miller.
3. You're not sane.
I promise you Hoopla, I don't own a gun.You can just call me Redtail. If I could, I'd change my name to that anyway.-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
gonnano Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 372
- Joined: March 27, 2010
- Location: USA
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
You were my other target gonnano, on N1. You had no gun. I targetted redtail N2, and he had a gun.
The reason I targetted you two was so I could clean up the D1 lynchwagon on Eleran, so I knew how many scum were on it, which would enable me to look for specific tells if I knew how many scum were on it.-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
A gunsmith is a cop, but instead of finding out the role you find out whether or not the person has a gun.
If you got a positive on me, I would be a mafia member, serial killer, or vigilante. A VT, cop, or doc would not have a gun.
Did I miss anything?You can just call me Redtail. If I could, I'd change my name to that anyway.-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
-
-
Hoopla
-
-
redtail896 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: May 14, 2010
- Location: East Coast
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.