Yes but you admitted to having experience. I'm in 8 newbie games, but I'm not a newbie I just like the setup. Also you just contredicted yourself there. You said I am a newb, but I've played irl and on other sites.Mysterio wrote:@Shotty
First of all, "playing the noob card" in a newbie game would be redundant. Those not identified as IC's or SE's are assumed to be newbies, since that's what these games are for. Second of all, Ineverclaimed that I was new to mafia. I even mentioned that I've played a few games on another forum. I specifically stated that I was new to MS (this website, if you didn't understand the acronym), which is obviously true. That is misrepresentation #1.
So now you admit to contradicting yourself, that was easy for me. So what you are saying is that you only vote if you are 100% sure about someone, but you will manipulate other people into voting how you really want to vote. Thats just scummy.Mysterio wrote:Next, you claim that I only want people to vote when they are "100% sure". This is contradicted byevery single post I've made in this game.I criticized Leech for not switching his vote, I then criticized the non-voters for not putting up a vote. In fact, your argument is pretty similar to mine. I'll first quote your argument:Shotty wrote:Only mafia wants people to only vote when they are 100% sure, that way the game goes no where and there is no pressure on the scum.
Once again this is why you can't pull the newb card, but maybe you should try to pull the dumb ass one. You are so wrong about this. The game progresses due to people talking, and scum hunting, not just blind voting and mislynching. Stop being scummy if you don't want people to think you are scummy.Mysterio wrote:Now I'll quote my argument:Mysterio wrote:Vote or don't vote, but you should know that not voting means the game doesn't progress. So, at some point you should vote if for no other reason than to put pressure on that person. Depending on how they respond, you can keep your vote on them or unvote. Refraining from voting completely just makes the game stagnant.
also you said this "It's a bit suspicious itself to keep a vote on anyone other than the person you find suspicious. It seems to me that simply muddles up the game even more."
yes dumb ass, thats what I did, that is the point of this game and it's called scum hunting, I know you don't like it because you are scum, but it's how the game progresses.Mysterio wrote:It's almost as if you read my argument and then tried to use it against me. Misrepresentation #2.
ok here again i will qoute you "It's a bit suspicious itself to keep a vote on anyone other than the person you find suspicious. It seems to me that simply muddles up the game even more." Then you said "In my experience, switching votes does nothing to muddle up a game" So first you say we shouldn't change our votes unless we are 100% certain, then you say switching vote is great.Mysterio wrote:Next, you accuse me of contradicting myself by saying that changing votes doesn't muddle up the game. Where exactly is this contradiction? I maintained my position that switching votes is fine, it's only when you don't vote or keep your vote on people without updating it do things get muddled. Misrepresentation #3.
That wasn't my case it was one point inside a very strong case. And what I meant is that you, since you are scum. Want everyone to play like you want so you aren't lynched, it's ok all scum want that, you just acted on that too much.Mysterio wrote:Next, you claim that I think my way is the only way to do things, and then conclude that is scummy. First, you're essentially saying that me arguing my position makes me look scummy. So, I would like for you to explain why I can't argue my position when I think I'm right, and how arguing my position makes me scummy. Not a misrepresentation, but definitely an incredibly weak case here.
First I want to point out the word generally. NOOOOO Mislynches AREMysterio wrote:Next, you accuse me of not having any problems with mislynches. Really? Did you miss the whole back and forth between me and Leech whereI'mthe one arguing that mislynches are generally not good? You took a statement that acknowledged some usefulness in mislynches and blew it up to mean that I think mislynches are perfectly fine. Misrepresentation #4.
Yes sir I hope thats what the title fairy calls me, but anyway you are confusing sometimes. Like when you are just really dumb.Mysterio wrote:Next, you accuse me of being confusing. lol, you really do live up to the VI title.
So you vote someone for no reason other than them voting you and them not explaing a very obvious statement. That's OMGUS.Mysterio wrote:Finally, you accuse me of OMGUS by calling both Chimp and Thian scummy and . First of all, I never called Thian scummy. Second, how is that OMGUS? That implies voting for someone who has voted you simply out of revenge with no reasoning. Thian hasn't voted for me and I haven't voted for him. Chimp made repeat arguments against me and I still didn't vote for him until after giving him 3 chances to explain himself. Misrepresentation #5.
WTF!! Really no! He is scum hunting that is why he is no longer voting you, dumb assMysterio wrote:In conclusion, I think policy lynching Shotty may is probably a decent move. However, I'm leaving my vote on Chimp because he has continued to make repeat accusations, even though he's not actually voting for me anymore. Which goes to show that he's not even scumhunting, but simply desperately defending a bandwagon vote.