Vote: Furcolow
I do think that you're a VI, but I'm not prepared to let you off the hook as some others have done simply because you play scummily.
Furcolow wrote:my fos wasn't serious because it was page 1. Do you believe you can catch scum on page 1? Typically people who FoS and vote someone like I did will be aligned with the person they FoSed in the first place, correct? Isn't that a standard JEEP tell?
Your reasoning for your vote on Bober is the exact same as your reasoning for your FoS on Bober on D1. You were willing to bring Bober to L - 1 and have him claim on page 3 for a non serious reason. Earlier, you said that you were satisfied with Bober's defense and that the main reason why you had your vote on Bober was because of that same non serious reason. Please point out where in Bober's defense that he once mentioned why he was lurking on the forums. Actually, please tell me how lurking on the forums is a scumtell. I lurk if I just want to get a quick read and don't have time to post.
Bober wrote:Caelum has done no scumhunting, but made a massive post pretending to, the nearest he got was lurker hunting moose, worth doing but no actual info has been found. Not very good, need more.
Funny. Your reasoning on Moose:
Bober wrote:Moose, instigated political talk, and is very guilty in not letting it drop earlier. Very very lurky. Hung onto the coattails of abob's accusation of me. The flip flop that admittedly wasnt a flip flop was the only content he has posted, now this I feel has been undermined content is needed Now. Actually quite scummy for the lack of content but will to talk about rubbish vote moose
Ignoring the fact that your first sentence doesn't really make sense, sounds a lot like my 'lack of real scumhunting and real info':
Very very lurky. Actually quite scummy for the lack of content but will to talk about rubbish vote moose
caelum wrote:Can you explain the lack of real material in your posts over the last 3 or 4 pages?
Hung onto the coattails of abob's accusation of me.
caelum wrote:Why would you "100%" agree with Archaebob in his argument and then not back up your words with a vote?
The flip flop that admittedly wasnt a flip flop was the only content he has posted, now this I feel has been undermined content is needed Now
caelum wrote:I don't see the point to these questions. You admitted that you didn't read his explanation, and then since you didn't focus on his explanation I assume that you were satisfied by it as well. How does his behavior when it comes to BW's affect his alignment at all?
He 'flip-flopped' once and for good reason, looks like you're either subtly trying to make something innocuous seem scummy or defend your lack of attention to his previous post. Don't try to defend it by saying that you were looking for more information, because I fail to see how his BW patterns will affect your read on him.
Let's not nitpick. The point is, it's strange that you call me out for pretending to scumhunt and not providing anything new when only
after
my post did you FoS moose at all, with reasoning on similar subjects.
moose wrote:K, I'll post a quick write up when I get off work.
Hope you'll answer my questions in Page 6 as well.
Sidenote: I'm confused over the Hresz/Wraith issue. It sounds like Hresz just voted Wraith for active lurking and then Wraith defended himself with outside reasons and then voted Hresz for voting Bober. Is that about right or can someone explain to me simply.