Open 238: Trendy and Subversive Game Over

[Tazaro]

Not really liking taz' wishy-washy-ness.

I'm easy to criticize. Hopefully, I don't get tunneled for it.

[ODDin]

Taz, in the other game I'm played with you (and it just ended so I can discuss it), you werent' really that wishy-washy - although you were only there for half a day, so it's not much meta. On the contrary, you only changed your vote once and after that it remained in its place until the lynch.
So, the only usable meta you have works against you.

Post 225 is pretty bad, though. Everybody can say "I'm easy to critisize". What you're doing is AtE (and also backtracking on your meta suggestion).
Plus, "tunneled" doesn't really make sense anyway. Saying "I hope I don't get lynched for it" sort of makes sense (though still AtE). But what has tunneling got to do with anything? You can be lynched without being tunneled by anyone, you can be tunneled without getting lynched.

[Tazaro]

I honestly have weak reads in this game. Mr. Chaos was a stronger read. I vote hop when I have weak reads.

[Tazaro]

And I become concerned about the possibility of scum pushing me as a lynch if I'm wishy-washy due to weak reads.

[ODDin]

Nice buildup to a future OMGUS there, pal.

[TeeJay]

Dude, Taz, your as bad as mallow.

[Tazaro]

We aren't going to get anywhere if we don't agree on who to lynch.

[ODDin]

Says the one who can't decide what to do either.

[Tazaro]

Since it's day one, I'm willing to be the hammer of any bandwagon.

[ODDin]

Are you, now? Even if you think it's a wrong bandwagon?
Even if it's your own bandwagon?

[Tazaro]

Not my own, of course. But a lynch as a result of an imperfect bandwagon is better than nothing.

[ODDin]

Of course some lynch is better than no lynch, but you should only be willing to hammer any wagon when it's the only option to avoid a no-lynch. Under all other conditions you should be trying to push towards the lynch you find best.
The way you put it, as an answer to my question, it would seem you're fine with any lynch at all, and you don't think it's really important to push towards the lynch you think is better. I don't think we're in danger of not lynching anyone today.

[gonnano]

Unless I'm mistaken, ODDin hasn't accused anyone unless they've already been accused by someone else. If I missed something, feel free to point it out, but it seems like all of ODDin's cases have been picking up someone else's case and running with it.

[ODDin]

I've been accusing TJ of being too cautious from my first post, and it's still part of my case against him. (Some other parts of this case have been pointed out by Sawyer before I said them, that's true.)
Right now, I don't think I'm running with anyone's case when accusing taz, although my accusation of him isn't really a full blown case at the moment.

[jmj3000]

Official Vote Count #7 of Day 1

Players needed to lynch: 4

mallowgeno

- 1 - TeeJay - (L-3)

ODDin

- 1 - podium123456 - (L-3)

Sawyer

- 1 - gonnano - (L-3)

TeeJay

- 3 - ODDin, Sawyer, Tazaro - (L-1)

Players not voting: mallowgeno

[jmj3000]

By they way, I am using the prodding app, so I know when to prod people. I will prod on request though.

[TeeJay]

(&49! Not a whole lot to say. To pick things up, I suggest 2 things. First, start by doing a Player-by-Player analysis (I've already done so). And vote (I would be willing to vote for either Oddin or Mallow.

[Tazaro]

I'm also willing to vote for Mallow.

[mallowgeno]

Tarazo, I want your claim now

[mallowgeno]

EBWOP:
Sorry I meant TeeJay

[Sawyer]

Mallow, you think TJ is most likely to be scum? If so, what are your reasons?

[podium123456]

i dont really have much to add at this point. looks like oddin will make it past today. mallow remains on his downward slide. gonnano voting sawyer is a joke. ummm... that's about it from my pov.

teejay should probably go ahead and claim at this point.

[Sawyer]

I'd appreciate if TJ held off claiming until I get answers from mallow.

[Tazaro]

Mallow's gone camping according to what he wrote elsewhere.

[Tazaro]

EBWOP: Mallow wrote it in his sig.