Alright, having read through what I missed, I see a lot of repeats. So, I'll be doing a bit of a drive-by on the repeat arguments.
Hinduragi wrote:The first quote was him saying you didn't have sufficient quotes backing your arguement.(You can link posts by right clicking the post number instead of quoting the entire thing btw) The second was more or less about you being a hypocrite in your points. The third was you misrepp'ing him. You should reread the post where I took those excerpts from. You're largely ignoring the entirety of my argument while defending yourself.
Firstly, it's not actually your argument. This is just something you're piggy-backing off of. Second, I've already responded to these points. Go back and read my full replies to Leech where I quote exactly what I'm accusing him of doing. I didn't type up those WoT's in response to Leech just to have to type them up again. Post's
#79 and
#87 are the posts you should refer to. Notice that I quote him and then argue how that particular quote is scummy.
@trachimbrod Your response doesn't add anything new, nor does it give me any reason to expound on my own response. Your point about investigating weak leads was a misrepresentation of my point, hence why I simply clarified. I'll say again, my point was to show that muddling up a game by pursuing weak leads on someone takes time and energy away from properly analyzing the other players, which hampers scumhunting. Yes, as I stated, information is limited at the beginning, which is why it becomes important to gather as much information as possible. Look at the result of Leech and I going back and forth? It slowed the game down to a crawl and essentially allowed a number of players to fly under the radar. This is not helpful to town.
As for me repeating that I was backing off Leech, I'll answer that in response to Thian:
Thian wrote:So Mysterio, I am going to ask you, was your second time stating you were backing off a response to Leech's post after my question?
My post was a response to you. Leech just happened to post before me. Also, this seems very weak. People repeat things for various reasons. Perhaps to expound on that point, or to simply remind themselves of a point. Perhaps to make sure others see it (my reason), or to make sure their point was understood by others. I really can't understand why this is being harped on.
@Leech (Post
#116) I think it's the other way around. You're stretching that comment far beyond it's fairly obvious meaning. Which is this: I think you're scum, you claim you're not. As such, my reasoning behind you being scum isn't something you would readily admit to. In other words, I don't expect a post from you admitting that your scum and we should go ahead and lynch you. And I now feel dumber for having to explain this. As for the rest of your post, I would refer you to the posts I cited for Hinduragi. Perhaps you should read them over again as they were meant to be read, rather than quoting parts of them as you went along. I also think it's time we stepped aside from the back and forth, as I'm interested in reading the other players. Plus, I think it would benefit this game greatly.