So, the problem I have here, is that for this to be occurring, Mafuyu would have to be the dumbest scum player ever, and I am really not seeing that. But what he/she is accusing you of would mean you would have to be the dumbest SK ever (actually strike that; I have seen some really bad SK play) and I'm not seeing that either. So, I guess ITT Mafuyu and Ythill vastly underestimate each others' intelligence.Ythill wrote:This is the third (and most important) thing that bothered me about #58, and it was the one I mentioned vaguely and that she denied. It looks very much like Maf-scum offering to make a deal with Ythill-SK. Look at how she's selling the idea.Maf wrote:If both anti-town parties know each other, they can at the very least temporarily truce. This would be beneficial for Ythill-SK in the terms that Ythill-SK cannot be betrayed easily for two reasons: the first being that there would have to be a cooperative Vig for an NK to take place on Ythill, the second being that scum would not be able to out Ythill-SK without losing at least one player, in this hypothetical instance NS.
Your post before Ythill's explanation did not contain any mention of this... And you defend yourself for this problem before even being attacked for it. How nice.Nobody Special wrote:See, this is what I thought was being said; I really need to learn discernment as to when to trust myself and not.
!!Andrius wrote:Not like lynching scum is a bad idea (it is a good idea), but shouldn't we hit the SK first (if we can) because he has the potential to be NP-untouchable. (Barring we don't have multiple killing roles hit him.)
UNVOTE: NS
VOTE: Andrius
lol at Ythill #97
Our reads are so different from each other it isn't even funny.