Vollkan (3) - Friend, PranaDevil, Scott Brosius
Friend (3) - Andrius, Vollkan, Tasky
Andrius (2) - Seraphim, Xite91
Not Voing (4) - Max, TheLonging, Sando, NicoBolas
no... just gave a reason to stop IioA...Friend wrote:I don't like how Tasky brings up IIoA and then posts a handful of IIoA. It's hypocritical.
As I saw it, this was IIoA. You writing out the list, while helpful, was also IIoA.Tasky wrote:first, I'd like to bring up the good old IioA-point... we shouldn't worry so much abut the setup...nobody would be so stupid to fake a popularity change, that could so easily be verified, it would just out them as scum... so even if there are popularity-manipulating roles, I really don't see the problem...
and I really don't see the big power of such (hypothetical) manipulating roles you attribute them...
second, I am rankedeleventhin popularity
third, please don't talk about other games if they are not relevant to scumhunting in this game
lol... no... go reread the IioA definitionFriend wrote:You writing out the list, while helpful, was also IIoA.
for fun... and for a reason that I'll tell later (it would self-nullify if told)Friend wrote: And why would you like to start a wagon on vollkan, who has arguably been one of the most pro-town players so far in this early game?
I'm rather curious as to this reason, given that there's not much info you could be using. Its not like we had a night start. :/Tasky wrote:for fun... and for a reason that I'll tell later (it would self-nullify if told)Friend wrote: And why would you like to start a wagon on vollkan, who has arguably been one of the most pro-town players so far in this early game?
oh yeah... have to jump on that... after all I hate bandwagons, right?PranaDevil wrote:unvote; vote: Tasky
You want a wagon, you got a wagon.
yeah, he didn't allow itAndrius wrote:He probably won't allow an anagram, dude.
okOk wow. Can we refrain from self-voting? It doesn't do anything besides make us wonder why you're doing it.
If you choose the right people you can make a "good impression" on them and they're convinced you're town. Then they don't even have to work so hard to fool people in thread cuz they got a townie to do that.Friend wrote:I agree with vollkan completely. That's what I had in mind when I suggested it. And I highly doubt that the level of popularity is tied to anything (PR-ness, alignment) so I don't think claiming it is rolefishing, like you said xite. Also, xite, why do you think scum would be able to fool a townie in the QT, when if they're that good at playing scum, they'll probably just be fooling them in the thread anyways?
I'm going to be using my 0 = town, 100 = scum scaling for everybody in this game, as I am trying to get back into the habit of it. Basically, everybody starts at 50. Scumtells push it up, towntells down.Tasky wrote: first, I'd like to bring up the good old IioA-point... we shouldn't worry so much abut the setup...nobody would be so stupid to fake a popularity change, that could so easily be verified, it would just out them as scum... so even if there are popularity-manipulating roles, I really don't see the problem...
and I really don't see the big power of such (hypothetical) manipulating roles you attribute them...
More early-game self-righteousness.Tasky wrote: third, please don't talk about other games if they are not relevant to scumhunting in this game
Obvious buddying is obvious.Friend wrote: And why would you like to start a wagon on vollkan, who has arguably been one of the most pro-town players so far in this early game?
Now that you are no longer wagonning me (despite the fact that you haven't had any response from me), mind saying what your mystery reason for wagonning me was?Tasky wrote:oh yeah... have to jump on that... after all I hate bandwagons, right?PranaDevil wrote:unvote; vote: Tasky
You want a wagon, you got a wagon.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tasky
where exactly did you see an attack in the above?vollkan wrote:I'm going to be using my 0 = town, 100 = scum scaling for everybody in this game, as I am trying to get back into the habit of it. Basically, everybody starts at 50. Scumtells push it up, towntells down.Tasky wrote: first, I'd like to bring up the good old IioA-point... we shouldn't worry so much abut the setup...nobody would be so stupid to fake a popularity change, that could so easily be verified, it would just out them as scum... so even if there are popularity-manipulating roles, I really don't see the problem...
and I really don't see the big power of such (hypothetical) manipulating roles you attribute them...
The above merits a +2. Reason being is that IIoA, while it is always an easy label for lazy scum to throw around, is not a scumtell at page 3 of a game where not even everybody has yet to post. Moreover, whether or not you think that the chances of popularity-manipulating roles is likely (and I note that nobody has suggested that it is), it's clearly something that due diligence required us to address in relation to the mass pop-claim strategy.
And, as others have already pointed out, it smacks of hypocrisy that you would accuse other people of IIoA and then have IIoA yourself. To be clear, my problem is not with your IIoA, it is with yourhypocrisy of attacking peoplefor IIoA
no... the reason was not about wagoningvollkan wrote:Now that you are no longer wagonning me (despite the fact that you haven't had any response from me), mind saying what your mystery reason for wagonning me was?
I highly diskile this post... I know Seraphim just a little, but I looked a little through his other games and he usually likes to start a wagon on someone slightly scummy early... what bugs me is that he didn't vote for me (I know this sounds strange, I hope you understand how I mean this)... after all I was top-pick for such an early wagonSeraphim wrote:almost forgot I was in this game. Popularity is a good idea and I was definitely considering it coming into this game.
Claim Seventh