Open 224 -- vengeful/Girls Alive! (Game Over)

[TheButtonmen]

Sorry for the delay; yesterday I couldn't access the site; kept saying server not found or transfering me to the don't panic.

[TheButtonmen]

TheButtonmen, you said a lot of nothing there, got anything else to say?

The irony made me lol.

Vote:Charter

[TheButtonmen]

Hnnnnn

I somehow missed post #5

Unvote:

[TheButtonmen]

@Fen:

I had missed charters other post, thus thought his ony post in the game was demanding another player post more content.

Vote: McGriddle

[TheButtonmen]

Indeed.

[TheButtonmen]

I'm really not comfortable with anyone being at L-1 this early.

unvote

Why?

[TheButtonmen]

A) Threating to vig people who vote you in't really the best way to convince me your town.

B) We most likely have > 1 chance to lynch scum.

C) Huge diffrence between L-1 and a Hammer, why do worried about being at L-1?

[TheButtonmen]

You've clearly talking about me, but go out of your way to avoid using my name. Why the ambiguity?

[TheButtonmen]

Scum could just make up any reason they wanted to now and hammer me and I would Vig TheButtonmen because I think he is scum.

Your the Godfather aren't you?

[TheButtonmen]

[quote="Fenchurch"
Thing 2: McGriddle's post 32 is kinda sus actually. Besides the name-dodging 'player X' thing, there's the "even if you're town, I'm gonna vig you" threat, which I think is the kind of thing a scum player would say since they know the attacker is town.[/quote]

You thought 32 was bad? Take a look at 38.

[TheButtonmen]

That vote on charter wasn't random / reaction. It was for serious; if he hadn't made that previous post I'd missed I would have been going after him for reals.

[TheButtonmen]

The McGriddle vote start off as me getting a bandwagon going because I wanted to see reactions and see what competing wagon people would chose; then Mcgriddle started being megascum and I became quite content with parking my vote where it was.

[TheButtonmen]

Where did I say at the time that I had town read on charter?

[TheButtonmen]

That vote on charter wasn't random / reaction.

It was for serious; if he hadn't made that previous post I'd missed I would have been going after him for reals.

These two statements (right next to each other! in the very same post!!) appear contradictory. Can you illuminate?

....?

It was a random vote or fishing for reactions; it was a serious vote. What part of that doesn't make sense?

@SV:

Also if you want me lynched why aren't you voting me?

[TheButtonmen]

Heh McG your still going on about how if you got hammered you would Vig me, but no one is hammering you eh?

I wonder why scum wouldn't take advantage of that?

All I can come up with is;

A) Your scum.
or
B) Me and Charter are scum.

So what do you say to getting someone to hammer you and then you can shoot me if your actually town; either your scum and its 3:1 D2 or your town and I'm scum and it's 2:1 tomorrow. Worst case scenario is 1 for 1!

EBWOP: It wasn't a random vote or fishing for reactions; it was a serious vote.

[TheButtonmen]

Christ SV; read my posts

That vote on charter wasn't random / reaction. It was for serious; if he hadn't made that previous post I'd missed I would have been going after him for reals.

Already gone of this with Fen; though nice quoting, chopping a sentence in half like that try to make it look condidictory.

[TheButtonmen]

I feel sorry for your goon.

[TheButtonmen]

A) I'm not appealing to emotions and/or experiance (though I could argue your post actually is AtE).
B) Not sure what you mean about trying to make you slip so as to call you scum. I'm already being quite blunt in calling you the Godfather.

[TheButtonmen]

....?

It was a random vote or fishing for reactions; it was a serious vote. What part of that doesn't make sense?

@SV:

Also if you want me lynched why aren't you voting me?

EBWOP: It wasn't a random vote or fishing for reactions; it was a serious vote.

Christ, scum, get lynched.

I'll be honest; I don't know what your trying to say here; but I'm glad to see you actually backing what you say up with a vote!

[TheButtonmen]

@SV:

Would quotes of me changing my story repeadtly be too much to ask for?

I voted for Charter because I had missed his precedding post; once I saw that line of thought was flawed I voted McG for reactions; he then made me quite content with parking my vote there.

If you think I've changed this story at all; please by all means get some quotes showing me doing so. Though this time please quote whole sentences; don't just quote bits and peices.

[TheButtonmen]

Come on Fen; let's hammer McG and call it a game.

[TheButtonmen]

Hi-Fives all around town!

[TheButtonmen]

And GG scum; the lack of both a NK and the ability to bus has to really suck.

[TheButtonmen]

Sorry McGriddle and Shattered Viewpoint, you were in a tough spot and got a bit unlucky there with the first wagon forming on the godfather.

Well done TheButtonmen and charter for being spot on with your voting; sorry for taking longer than you might have wanted to be convinced.

Yeah us getting the Godfather first rather then the Goon made this a lot more easy then it would have otherwise been.

Heh I'm not complaining about the speed of the game at all; Page 4 win is good enough for me.

[TheButtonmen]

Thumbs up with the modding; timely accurate vote counts and no problems pre/during/post game as far as I could tell.

[TheButtonmen]

What SV was saying... is it considered bad sportsmanship to meta people? I always assumed it was standard practice, if you had the time.

Naw it's fine I meta people all the time; though I normally don't tell them as then they can change their playstyle.