Okay.
I don't like the pushiness of charter and Buttonmen. I can't help imagining them in a scum qt, gloating over how they will be able to convince me if they push a bit harder.
But I don't like SV and McG's reasoning on Buttonmen, I think it's a flimsy case, and seems to be merely echoing things I said earlier. Same with SV attack on charter's "reliable scumtell", it was the same thing I said at the bottom of page 2. And out of Buttonmen and charter, I actually find charter more scummy; I can't pinpoint quite why, but I think he has been more manipulative throughout the game.
Thanks to charter for pointing out the typo; but I still don't think Buttonmen fully answered the question on why he started a wagon on McGriddle instead of charter. At that early stage in the game, surely creating pressure on either player would be equally good, why show a preference? But I'm edging to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that it was more or less on a whim. I don't think it's too much of a scummy move.
Actually, I'd say DID say that you would vengekill TBM even if you thought he was town.
McGriddle, post 25 wrote:You do realize we only have one chance to lynch scum right? And
you're obviously who I am going to kill when I die
, so if you are not scum I suggest you stop pushing for a terrible lynch based off of nothing on page 1, unless you want to lose.
I don't think you are scum though
, because scum wouldn't do something that balsey at the beginning of the game.
Overall, I think SV and McGriddle have put forth a much weaker case. And if I'm wrong, at least McGriddle will have an opportunity make right.
Icerint, I unvoted charter in post 30, but I'll do it again now just to make sure.
Unvote; Vote: McGriddle
