anywhom,
ON TO THE VOTE COUNT
Deer
Locke Lamora
Strangercoug
Pomegranate
Zazier (i love the whole "Sentence" thing, btw)
Esurio...
Not Voting
Everyone else (unless I missed some)
Grimmy
will update more as the week progresses.
Reason Animal stated nothing about possible insane investigator yesterday?Animal wrote:3. It says that in my Role PM. Basically something along the lines of "because you are a thief, you will turn up guilty in any investigations (although this may work to your advantage somehow)." Maybe a hint that the cop (which I assume there is) is insane? Not really sure.
Animal eliminated + flipping evil player = Espiritus also evil player.ESpiritus wrote:Deer could just be lying about miller status in order to gain safety from cop investigations, but the addition of this part of his claim makes me think it's legit. He claims to not have experience with the miller role, and if he is telling the truth about that then I doubt he would have the foresight as scum to not only fakeclaim miller in the event of a cop investigation, but also toss in something completely unique and unusual like that. Deer just doesn't seem the type to be that conniving.
Reason 'ignoring' Animal using restriction excuse lacking scumhunting?Espiritus wrote:I'd particularly like to hear more from DP. I agree wholeheartedly with Locke and his sentiment that DP could still be doing way more despite his PR.
Reasons?Iecerint wrote:R/Given R/just R/that R/information --
R/Townier
R/Iecerint
R/esuriospiritus
R/Pom
R/Deer
R/Scummier
R/Locke Lamora
R/Shattered Viewpoint
R/StrangerCoug
R/DocPotter
R/ZazieR
ZazieR being Electrode Grimmy Pokemon Mafia. Electrode also having seperate winning condition. Electrode also winning opposite evil players winning even after failing seperate winning condition.LLamora wrote:CC also seems to have been town-aligned but with a separate wincon - can you change wincon but remain town-aligned?
T/Maybe. T/Nothing.LL wrote:The Locke says there are scenarios in which it would benefit scum-Pome to not use her tag right away. The Locke would also like to know what about Deer's results indicate a pro-town alignment.
T/No. T/Why?Z wrote:Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?
T/Agreed.Z wrote:Reason Animal stated nothing about possible insane investigator yesterday?
They both have dubious claims, you see.ZazieR wrote:@StrangerC
Reason either Pome, Animal being evil player?
Iecy asking reason? ZazieR asking because Iecy stated something interesting early pages. Iecy stated evil players perhaps having different restrictions, instead getting submitted restrictions. Every submitted restriction posted. Comparing stated restriction, submitted restrictions showing errors:Iecerint wrote:T/No. T/Why?Z wrote:Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?
T/Reasons T/are T/in T/the T/post T/before T/that T/one. T/Did T/you T/miss T/that? T/I'm T/still T/thinking T/about T/the T/reasons, T/but T/they T/imply T/that T/list.
PositiveLLamora wrote:To Zazier, The Locke says this: would you expect Deer to mention something about insane cops without claiming miller?
The Role Reversal is permanent- clear?Iecerint wrote:S/Did S/you S/ever S/clarify S/whether S/this S/effect S/was S/permanent?Pome wrote:I am "It" (as in, when you play tag, and someone is "it"), K? And so at night I can make someone else "it" by tagging them(and I'm not the "it" anymore), got it so far? But when I tag someone, everything directed at me is redirected to the person I tagged, aka the new "it"- make sense so far? But if the new "it" dies, I'm "it" again, K?
S/Also, S/is S/your S/ability S/like S/a S/roleblock S/on S/the S/night S/that S/you S/use S/it?
Does it satisfy you right not to know that I've PMed Grimmy with this question?Locke Lamora wrote:The Locke does not see any answers to his questions. Pome, does your role give you any indication of what would have happened if you targeted CC or Zang? The Locke says there is no way, and The Locke means no way, that you swapping roles with Zang does not constitute an alignment change. CC also seems to have been town-aligned but with a separate wincon - can you change wincon but remain town-aligned?
In what way is it unsatisfactory?Shattered Viewpoint wrote:Pome's explanation be NAY satisfactory. Nay at all, me hearties.
Vote: Pomegranate
What answers are needed, other than to the one question above?Locke Lamora wrote:The Locke says answers are needed about Pome's role right away. The Locke does not think it would be that hard to clarify precisely what Pome's role affects and what its purpose is, but the lack of prompt answers make The Locke concerned that there might be aspects of this role Pome does not want us to hear.
How, may I ask, is the possibility rendered naught,Iecerint wrote:U/^ U/SC's U/post U/makes U/no U/sense. U/Pom U/can't U/be U/lying U/about U/her U/role U/unless U/Deer U/is U/scum U/with U/her.
Iecy ignoring ZazieR?ZazieR wrote:Iecy asking reason? ZazieR asking because Iecy stated something interesting early pages. Iecy stated evil players perhaps having different restrictions, instead getting submitted restrictions. Every submitted restriction posted. Comparing stated restriction, submitted restrictions showing errors:Iecerint wrote:T/No. T/Why?Z wrote:Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?
T/Reasons T/are T/in T/the T/post T/before T/that T/one. T/Did T/you T/miss T/that? T/I'm T/still T/thinking T/about T/the T/reasons, T/but T/they T/imply T/that T/list.
ZazieR, Iecy, DPotter.
Iecy clearly 'ignoring' something Iecy thinking possibility catching evil players. Evil Iecy player.
DPotter also needing explain reason DPotter 'ignored' Stated restrictions VS Submitted restrictions.
Negative. Message above showing Iecy opinion Pomy opposite evil player. Reason Iecy opinion making players townier/ scummier?
It should be made right off the bat.Deer wrote:What's strangeabout themiller claim?
The mod told me that there are no alignment changed- clear? So I PM'ed him asking what would happen had I targeted Zang last night, and I'm waiting for a response, so that is that for now, isn't it?Locke Lamora wrote:To Pome, The Locke says this: The Locke wants lots of answers about the role because The Locke thinks both that not only does it imply an anti-town alignment, particularly with Deer's results, but it also has extensive implications for the whole set-up. If you definitely can steal any role, then it renders Iecerint's assumption about Deer totally null and void because all the roles must be alignment-ambiguous enough to switch sides. The Locke cannot understand how this can be with an SK in the game, however, so The Locke is assuming that either the role does not work on every player, or that it does not work in the way you have been told it works, or that this game is incredibly swingy and alignment changes are possible. Answers would be better than assumptions.