Alright, here's how I'm seeing everything so far with five pages to work with.
Adaham: 15 posts, medium content.
Comes off town to me. Genuinely contributes and I agree with his thoughts on LobsterCatapult being fishy and AdumbroDeus having a very shifty Valk vote. I like how he targets everybody.
AdumbroDeus: 12 posts, low content.
I think this is the first time I am posting in regard to AdumbroDeus. Long overdue. Upon looking specifically at his posts, he comes off quite scummy. Does the exact same thing I got dinged for and voted Valk for lurking despite sailorpallas also yet to post. Only thing is, he posted with a serious tone. Whole dealeo about lynching weak players and lurkers is bizarre and really doesn't make sense. Guys trying to seem low profile but I see smoke here.
Hoopla(IE): 17 posts, medium content.
Starter of the MrSandman bandwagon. I think it was perfectly valid. You come off as the aggressive type(state you like people close to lynch) and it's a good way to get information for the town early on. However this recent statement:
makes my scumdar go off. Not only is the town in a bad position right now,(two players not posting anything of value) we still have 2 weeks to come up something better than we have now. Yes the game is running slow and all but we only have 5 pages of information riddled with double posts and offtopic nonsense. With only 7 actively posting, if Sailor and Valk are both town and remain irrelevant it would take all 5 remaining townies to lynch scum.Everyone else; we're getting to the point where we've got enough data to work with tomorrow and we should be wrapping up Day 1 before this game evaporates and goes stale. After Valkyrie and Sandman have placed a vote, we can view the collective suspicions of everyone and come to an agreement on someone.
Hitting day one is slim but still, I want to at least have a chance. I'll vote but I am definitely not in favor of lynching someone with the town down 2 and 2 weeks left until the deadline.
Is there a chance your just being the IC trying to get things moving/ frustrated and want progress? Sure. That's why you're not one of my top suspects. I get a slight scum read on you but there are bigger fish to fry.
Kingcod(SE): 7 posts, low-medium content.
I get a scum read on Kingcod becuase he was third on the MrSandman wagon with the absolute worst reason, not sharing Valk's PM to me. Tries his best to come off protown but it looks like active lurking to me. Which I think is far more dangerous than just not posting. Backed off on the whole tunneling thing when I inquired and yes, the FoS did look very OMGUS.
In response to your questions:
Not at all, I've just been cautious with my vote. Waiting until I have a conclusive target.kingcod wrote: @Sandman - are you not voting because you are scum?
You or AdumbroDeus.kingcod wrote: Who should be topping the vote list if not you?
LobsterCatapult 19 posts, low-medium content.
Not sure on this guy. Playing newbie style and that's fine but seems all over the place. I agree with her on some things but the long posts when questioned or suspected looks bad. Could just be a total newbie trying to help the town, scum or all an act. Neutral(We are only at five pages after all) but if you put a gun to my head, I would lean ever so slightly to defensive scum.
RayFrost(SE) 11 posts, low-medium content.
Second on the MrSandman bandwagon. Vote spawned from talk over the Valkyrie vote. Didn't think it was justified but other than that I get a town vibe from RayFrost. Asks relevant questions, makes remarks and attempts to scum hunt. Agree with the weirdness of the Hoopla Valkyrie town read. Neutral read leaning lightly town.
Sailorpallas 5 posts, very low content.
Valkyrie 6 posts, very very very low content.
Post! You have said you are suspicious of Sailorpallas and AdumbroDeus but only mentioned each once. Which is it and why? I get a slight scum read on you becuase you got very defensive when called out about not contributing and lied by saying you have added content.
In conclusion, I will