Porkens (L-5) ~ Seraphim, Percy
Seraphim (L-5) ~ Nikanor, Gammagooey
dramonic (L-6) ~ Porkens,
TonyMontana (L-6) ~ Debonair Danny DiPietro
Debonair Danny DiPietro (L-6) ~ TonyMontana
[size=0]TM 0[/size]
Battery Power:
a) Calling someone out for posting in another game is valid if that person is lurking in the one you're playing. We were on p26. That's ridiculous. The fact that you Voted him is one thing, the fact that you backed it up and held to your nonRandom Vote is another. What exactly would you expect him to post? RVS nonsense? What is the Scum motivation behind VP's actions here? b)Did you check on the other players to see if they were posting anywhere else? If it's a valid ScumHunting option for page 2 and you didn't, why not?Nikanor wrote:a) I don't see how being serious about something is scummy, and b) I never skipped over any reasoning.d3x wrote:This does not feel like RVS joking to me, it feels legit. Couple that with the fact that he backs up the position in p48 {he calls it both evidence and a lead} and we're heading down to UnHappy town. He also skips past his reasoning for ignoring the other lurkers {not so subtley from you in p29 and again in p41 just in case he missed it the first time around}.
The problem is, youYeah, and because I do them as scum I assume that everyone does them as scum. That's how I hunt for scum. I think, "What would I do in his position, as scum and as town?" and then make a decision on his scumminess/towniness accordingly.
And I don't ever recall doing this as town.
So you are holding the position that Percy was Lurking when he made his 'catching up' post?Lurker hunting on page five fails, that's why. I had better evidence, so I went for it.
So where are you now?Anyway, the point is not that I do that exclusively as scum. The point is that I do that as scum five times more often than I do as town.
This.VP wrote:In fact, dram, since you've been on Nik since your random vote I'd like you to explain why you are on the wagon still and why you think he'd be the best lynch.
What specifically makes Tony different from Seraphim or dramonic?I can't believe{AwesomeWagon}is the wagon a plurality of the town is pushing while simultaneously enabling Tony to do nothing.
Just as a heads up, a nonlazy RL day of posting will get us about 5% depletion/RL day. By that logic, we have less than a week with fully active posting. I wouldn't categorize us as the most active of Towns right now. Recently, we've been dropping ~5-10%/RL day. With this in mind, we could have as few as 3 RL days until deadline.The Rules wrote:the battery will be replenished by 10% (enough for two days if you're not lazy about it).
He displayed high opportunism with his vote on Percy and then vanished into a puff of smoke. I find this to be at best anti-town, at worst downright scummy.VP Baltar wrote:In fact, dram, since you've been on Nik since your random vote I'd like you to explain why you are on the wagon still and why you think he'd be the best lynch.
It looks to me like Seraphim has actually tried to get involved at least once in the game. I don't think dramonic is so different than Tony really and I could accept lynching either of them.d3x wrote:@DDD-What specifically makes Tony different from Seraphim or dramonic?I can't believe{AwesomeWagon}is the wagon a plurality of the town is pushing while simultaneously enabling Tony to do nothing.
*As I refuted Pomegranate's points Niks behavior has not been scummy, his points may be incorrect but that doesn't correlate one to one with scummy.VP Baltar wrote:DDD, in three sentences or less, tell me why I should switch from Nik to dramonic.
*I'm not certain I agree. I do think Nik was reaching more than a bit. I can see where you are coming from, but I'm not certain.DDD wrote:*As I refuted Pomegranate's points Niks behavior has not been scummy, his points may be incorrect but that doesn't correlate one to one with scummy.
*Are you sure this isn't just a case like F&E where a player made the mistake of attacking a player with connections and friends that leads to his demise.
*We cannot allow players to just coast through the game without even trying; as we both know allowing such behavior is a recipe for disaster.