Now, I'm likely not going to be on at deadline, so I'm going to say this.
Any voting/unvoting will not count in two hours. If you try to, you will be heartily laughed at.
You better have a good reason. I doubt you have anything as I already explain the bs slip that sando is all about and continues to ignore my point of doing it yesterday.Gheb wrote:Not as much as Yellow but I do.farside22 wrote:Sorry I should say Gheb has no reason's for wanting my lynch as far as I found.
This actually makes alot of sense. Because if Startransmission really is the Doc as he says it is, I could imagine that both mafia tried to target him, therefore both of their NK's would be cancelled.Chronopie wrote:I'm guessing that the mafia either both hit the same person, both tried to hit the other scum team, or doc was right + one tried hit the other. /NK spec
I'll get back to you but things to note:CSl wrote:JacobSavage (L-1)Max,kmd4390,farside22,chauchaudotcom, startransmission,yellowbunny !
I think you've misunderstood Chrono's NK Spec. Chrono basically listed all the possible outcomes (assuming scum submitted at all). They are:TQO wrote:To Sando: What are your thoughts on Chronopies NK Speculation. Agree/Disagree?
Wait, what?TQO wrote:To Startransmission: If you feel comfortable discussing your night actions post claim, did you successfully protect someone last night or was it just dual NK targeting? You don't have to reveal any identities. Just if one of them was protected by you.
I don't know about Chrono/Max any more. I find Chrono scummy. (1) not reading the game (2) following bw and lacey felt scummy to me most of day 1.To Farside: Care to elaborate as to why you suspect Max? Do you also feel there is a Chrono/Max connection?
Even though I don't like farside's play so far this post is utter bullshit. Farside has been after Max literally all game and now it suddenly becomes worth a vote? That doesn't seem right to me at all as I don't remember you commenting about Max vs farside all that much before.Chronopie wrote:But seriously Farside, no case, no explanation even? Did your NK attempt fail vs max?
Vote: FarsideI like this one.
Sando wrote:Wait, what?TQO wrote:To Startransmission: If you feel comfortable discussing your night actions post claim, did you successfully protect someone last night or was it just dual NK targeting? You don't have to reveal any identities. Just if one of them was protected by you.
Unless doc's normally get notified of success or failure of their protections (I've never played a proper doc), this is an incredibly odd question.
farside22 wrote:I will keep asking this question in response to you one point against me on my vote.farside22 wrote:@Gheb: Would pushing your lynch result in the same outcome as lynching Jacob?