Newbie 139 - Game Over

For Newbie Games, which have a set format and experienced moderators. Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: September 2, 2005

Post Post #25 (ISO) » Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:52 pm

Post by Crazy_Frog_33 »

:evil: My brother was logged in, the poster above is me. I'll try not to let it happen again.
Wanted: The most annoying thing in the world.
Reward: 50,000
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
User avatar
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
Posts: 3187
Joined: February 15, 2004
Location: Jersey shore

Post Post #26 (ISO) » Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:55 pm

Post by NanookTheWolf »

stark wrote:and, since norinel has 2 votes already, i will
unvote: norinel
because there is no point starting early bandwagons. im not sure what to think about crazy frog, and it does sound suspicious, but not so much, as to invoke an FOS from me
Unvote: Xaph, Vote: Stark


... Starting a bandwagon?

Dude, what mafia in there right mind would hop onto that without some pretty damn good reasoning?

I mean seriously now?
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
User avatar
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
Posts: 3187
Joined: February 15, 2004
Location: Jersey shore

Post Post #27 (ISO) » Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Post by NanookTheWolf »

stark wrote:and, since norinel has 2 votes already, i will
unvote: norinel
because there is no point starting early bandwagons. im not sure what to think about crazy frog, and it does sound suspicious, but not so much, as to invoke an FOS from me
Unvote: Xaph, Vote: Stark


... Starting a bandwagon?

Dude, what mafia in their right mind would hop onto that without some pretty damn good reasoning?

I mean seriously now?

Ps (Not sure if this is going to double post or not, cause I pressed esc directly after I hit submit .. noticed a typo, and wouldn't want to offend Norinel) Also, I seem to keep forgetting about this game, so if I don't post for more then a day or two, feel free to *poke* at me.
User avatar
stark
stark
commie scum
User avatar
User avatar
stark
commie scum
commie scum
Posts: 1607
Joined: August 5, 2005
Location: The United Snakes

Post Post #28 (ISO) » Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:07 am

Post by stark »

i see what you mean, that was bad phrasing by me. 2 votes with 4 to lynch is alot for one person so early in the game. my bad.
Xaph
Xaph
Townie
Xaph
Townie
Townie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 28, 2005

Post Post #29 (ISO) » Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:02 am

Post by Xaph »

Hmm? You voted?
Xaph ~ The One Man Army

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
stark
stark
commie scum
User avatar
User avatar
stark
commie scum
commie scum
Posts: 1607
Joined: August 5, 2005
Location: The United Snakes

Post Post #30 (ISO) » Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:06 am

Post by stark »

it was in the spirit of random voting day one.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:03 am

Post by Blackberry »

Keeping my vote, Crazy's accusation's of the non-voters was completly illogical.
Xaph
Xaph
Townie
Xaph
Townie
Townie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 28, 2005

Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:27 pm

Post by Xaph »

I agree with Blackberry about it being nonsensical.
Unvote:Norinel
FOS: Crazy_Frog_33
Xaph ~ The One Man Army

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: September 2, 2005

Post Post #33 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2005 1:09 am

Post by Crazy_Frog_33 »

Blackberry, your still taking this way to personaly. You say I'm making contradictions, but you do as well. If you look at the first page you voted me, then you said you dont know why every ones voting for stark and I. How do you explain that?
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #34 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:34 am

Post by Blackberry »

I was referring to Xaph and Stark, not you.

I'm not voting you personally, I'm voting you because your statement was illogical.
User avatar
MeMe
MeMe
Post or Perish
User avatar
User avatar
MeMe
Post or Perish
Post or Perish
Posts: 10710
Joined: October 6, 2002
Location: Missouri

Post Post #35 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:49 am

Post by MeMe »

Vote Count


Crazy_Frog_33
(1):
Blackberry

Blackberry
(1):
Crazy_Frog_33

stark
(1):
NanookTheWolf


Not voting
(4):
Iammars, Norinel, stark, Xaph


Four votes will end the day.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There needs to be a serious uptick in posting within the next 24 hours or you'll be dealing with a deadline.

You heard me.
Remember...It's not a lie if you believe it. -- G. Costanza
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
User avatar
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
Posts: 3187
Joined: February 15, 2004
Location: Jersey shore

Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:59 am

Post by NanookTheWolf »

Blackberry wrote:
Crazy_Frog_33 wrote:Sorry, I didn't know the game had started.

I vote Blackberry
I vote Blackberry because I agree with nanook but i also think if you dont think anyones suspicious then why vote when you can wait a couple postings then vote.
You just totally contradicted yourself. You're voting for the EXACT reason that you say 'i think if you dont think anyone suspicious then why vote when you can wait a couple postings then vote.' That's exactly what I did and yet you vote me.

...

And to your other post... I DID vote

'Planning something big?'... lol, personally that sounds
odd
.
Ok, I've been trying to read through this reasoning for a while now, and I'm not sure that I understand it.

Are you voting Frog because he agreed with my reasoning on not placing a vote combined with the fact that he says he understands voting after a couple of posts?

Frog, Can you explain again why you are voting Blackberry?

I don't know about anyone else, but I took Frog's vote as random. I think when he said "I vote Blackberry b/c" had Blackberry thinking that my reasoning is that of which he voted for him.

I'm just a little confused here, can someone help me on this, cause this may just be the reason why the town isn't being all that active. I'd choose one person to vote between the two possibly if there were some clarity about what's going on.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:04 am

Post by Blackberry »

Im voting him because he isn't making any sense. He contradicts himself about me and the statement 'planning something big' makes absolutely no sense and is really illogical/stupid.
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: September 2, 2005

Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:46 am

Post by Crazy_Frog_33 »

You're right nanook, it kinda was a random vote. I kept the vote because Blackberry's reaction seemed a bit suspicious. I can understand Blackberrys logic: My post really did make no sense. I already explained why it made no sense.

Unvote: Blackberry


Norinel hasn't posted in a while. I'm going to give him a
FOS
. Hopefully he'll post a little more.[/b]
Xaph
Xaph
Townie
Xaph
Townie
Townie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 28, 2005

Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:15 am

Post by Xaph »

>.< Sorry about not posting, I'm still rather confuzzled about who said what and when. Although, I do support Crazy_Frog's claim of Norinel not posting for a while.
Xaph ~ The One Man Army

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Norinel
Norinel
Not Voting (3)
User avatar
User avatar
Norinel
Not Voting (3)
Not Voting (3)
Posts: 1684
Joined: March 2, 2003
Location: My computer

Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:03 am

Post by Norinel »

Xaph wrote:>.< Sorry about not posting, I'm still rather confuzzled about who said what and when. Although, I do support Crazy_Frog's claim of Norinel not posting for a while.
Claim? That's a factual statement, if you define "a while". (But note that I'd been gone some of Friday and Saturday)

But since Xaph's previous posts haven't been much more helpful, I'll
vote: Xaph
. Saying controversial/interesting things is the best way to get somewhere.
User avatar
Iammars
Iammars
Mers I am not
User avatar
User avatar
Iammars
Mers I am not
Mers I am not
Posts: 2362
Joined: January 9, 2005
Location: Mars... duh.

Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:27 am

Post by Iammars »

Oh no! Not a deadline!
Anyway, I think that the whole thing between Blackberry and Crazy Frog was just a big misunderstanding. I believe taht Crazy frog was just random voting. On the other hand I do not get what was meant by "Blackberry and ... must be planning something big" How could not voting be planning something big?
"Rolefishing is fishing for someones role. It's called fishing because it requires subtlety. When you grab a shotgun and start firing into the water, thats not fishing." - IH
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
User avatar
User avatar
NanookTheWolf
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
R.I.P. He trusted mathcam.
Posts: 3187
Joined: February 15, 2004
Location: Jersey shore

Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:47 am

Post by NanookTheWolf »

I was going to unvote stark in my earlier post, but I'll leave since it's been a 'while' since he's posted ...

Anyways, on to the Berry VS Frog bit. I find it weird that Berry takes it as something more then confusion and is still voting for the little bugger, while Frog comes straight out and says, yeah it was just a misunderstanding and unvotes.

meh?

There has to be something to their reactions that I'm not seeing .. see if they both responded like berry, then I would have guessed they were town, if both responded like Frog, then I would have assumed mafia, and finally since there seems to be one on each side, does that mean my theory identifies Frog as scum?
Xaph
Xaph
Townie
Xaph
Townie
Townie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 28, 2005

Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:10 am

Post by Xaph »

Hmm? I seem to have misunderstood the meaning of the word claim. I meant 'factual statement'. The reason's my posts haven't been that contributive is, in my opinion, that I'm new. I barely know enough to play.
Xaph ~ The One Man Army

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Xaph
Xaph
Townie
Xaph
Townie
Townie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 28, 2005

Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:12 am

Post by Xaph »

Oookay. I just realised how that sounded. Basically, I think that my posts suck because I'm new.
Xaph ~ The One Man Army

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
stark
stark
commie scum
User avatar
User avatar
stark
commie scum
commie scum
Posts: 1607
Joined: August 5, 2005
Location: The United Snakes

Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:38 am

Post by stark »

NanookTheWolf wrote:I was going to unvote stark in my earlier post, but I'll leave since it's been a 'while' since he's posted ...

sorry about that guys, school has just started for me and i have a hell of alot more home work than im used to. nothing very conclusive so far to vote by, so im going to save my vote for now
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Crazy_Frog_33
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: September 2, 2005

Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:40 am

Post by Crazy_Frog_33 »

Iammars, I meant it like this they could of been private messaging each other but that was illogical.

I dont know about this, Iammars give me a good reason why i should not vote you, you too noriel.

I might vote for Iammars because hes made only 4 posts, 3 at the begening, and 1 when I was voting Xaph for not talking, so when I said that he immediately posted...

FOS: Iammars
Wanted: The most annoying thing in the world.
Reward: 50,000
User avatar
Norinel
Norinel
Not Voting (3)
User avatar
User avatar
Norinel
Not Voting (3)
Not Voting (3)
Posts: 1684
Joined: March 2, 2003
Location: My computer

Post Post #47 (ISO) » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:33 am

Post by Norinel »

Crazy_Frog_33 wrote:I dont know about this, Iammars give me a good reason why i should not vote you, you too noriel.
There's no good reason to vote for me, while there are good reasons to vote for other players.
Xaph
Xaph
Townie
Xaph
Townie
Townie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 28, 2005

Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:51 am

Post by Xaph »

I don't know, that avatar looks MIGHTY suspicious...:p
Xaph ~ The One Man Army

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Sep 13, 2005 8:26 am

Post by Blackberry »

Ugh, please raise your hand if you felt Crazy's vote was random. Right now I'm eyeing Nanook and Crazy, Nanook sounds like he was trying to cover up for Crazy. But then Nanook says Crazy could be mafia, so now I don't know, lol.

I don't understand how Crazy's vote could be random if he followed it with reasoning. Meh, I have nothing else to go on right now, so I'm stickin with Crazy, lol.

Return to “The Road to Rome [Newbie Games]”