Mini 950: DCI Mafia (The Results Are In...)

[Slaxx]

True. I guess I could go either way.

unvote

Vote Ani

[Parama]

I don't understand the ani case that well to be honest... the weak logic and the lurkingish is all I can see. And weak logic is more a symptom of stupidity than scumminess from my experience.
He's had some weird interactions with Nvay though; defending his responses/attacks on me and all.

[Slaxx]

Could be both. More likely scum.

[Trumpet of Doom]

animorpherv1 has been prodded.

ToD Presents: The Best of DCI (Phantom Regiment, 2006: Faust)

Vote Count G:

animorpherv1 (4, L-3) - Nachomamma8, Nicodemus, NavyCherub, Slaxx

Looker (2, L-5) - Stephoscope, kunkstar7
kunkstar7 (2, L-5) - Parama, Nikanor
Nicodemus (2, L-5) - animorpherv1, CryMeARiver
Parama (2, L-5) - Starbuck, Looker

Not Voting (0):

7 votes are required to lynch, 4 at deadline.
If deadline were to hit right now, animorpherv1 would be lynched.

Current Deadline:

Friday, April 16, 2010, ~7:45 AM CDT (GMT-6+1)

[Nikanor]

ani is still a good lynch. I wonder what happened to him using the Clank account (I haven't read the rest of the topic, btw. I'm leaving for work and just posting to say I'm here).

[animorpherv1]

Welp. I'm here, wait a moment and I'll have some reads.

[animorpherv1]

--Missed Questions--

ani

is suspicious for advocating a policy lynch when another player is equally applicable for that same lynch, based on the criteria of the policy. Why me instead of Starbuck?

I don't find Starbuck to be a policy lynch.


--Starbuck vs. Parama/Slaxx--

Probably.

WHAT?!?!?!?! You just admitted to twisting her words. That in and of itself is scummy.

unvote, vote Slaxx

Also, Starbuck did better. Parama and Slaxx basically just said "Your wrong, I'm right" that entire time.

--Slaxx--
So, someone disagrees with something you said, you automatically say that they are scum because they don't agree with you? BADBADBAD. Try finding scum based on logic, innstead of disagreeing with you. To put it in ocntent, when you said Me/Steph/Para scum, 2 of those disagreed with you, so they HAVE to be scum, because all townies think EXACTLY the same, ya know.

--@Nico--
I changed my email, so mith needed to reconfirm it.

--Parama--
You got 3 scum reads in 3 pages, which is UNHEARD OF, even if we did leave the RVS/RQS on Page 2, you basically got 3 scum reads on 1 page. Explain:

a)How you got 3 Scumreads in essentially 1 1/2 pages.
b)How the connect together.

[animorpherv1]

EBWOP:

--Missed Questions--

ani

is suspicious for advocating a policy lynch when another player is equally applicable for that same lynch, based on the criteria of the policy. Why me instead of Starbuck?

I don't find Starbuck to be a policy lynch.


--Starbuck vs. Parama/Slaxx--

Probably.

WHAT?!?!?!?! You just admitted to twisting her words. That in and of itself is scummy.

unvote, vote Slaxx

Also, Starbuck did better. Parama and Slaxx basically just said "Your wrong, I'm right" that entire time.

--Slaxx--
So, someone disagrees with something you said, you automatically say that they are scum because they don't agree with you? BADBADBAD. Try finding scum based on logic, innstead of disagreeing with you. To put it in ocntent, when you said Me/Steph/Para scum, 2 of those disagreed with you, so they HAVE to be scum, because all townies think EXACTLY the same, ya know.

--@Nico--
I changed my email, so mith needed to reconfirm it.

--Parama--
You got 3 scum reads in 3 pages, which is UNHEARD OF, even if we did leave the RVS/RQS on Page 2, you basically got 3 scum reads on 1 page. Explain:

a)How you got 3 Scumreads in essentially 1 1/2 pages.
b)How the connect together.

[Parama]

ITT Ani misreps everything I've ever said without understanding my logic and sides with Starbuck on everything ever.

[Stephoscope]

In fact, under ISO, you havent done anything BUT go for Looker.

You remember I joined the game late, right? And is it my fault the person I suspect couldn't be bothered to respond?

[kunkstar7]

The only "defense" he's provided is that my sureness makes me scummier even though I didn't imply absolute sureness.

Honestly, I'm confused at what you are really driving at here. My only defense to what exactly? The rest of the sentence implies that I said you are scummy for something completely unrelated to your reason why I am scum and that was my defense for your suspicion on me?

While I do think that it is suspicious that you can somehow manage to maintain a notion that you have all three scum "nailed" within these pages, I never used that suspicion as a defense against your suspicion of me(which would have basically been OMGUS).

I still believe Looker is a better option right now, until at least he is replaced and shows up/ or shows up himself and explains why he did that last vote and disappeared.

[Slaxx]

Oh cool. You're voting me for sarcasm.

[NavyCherub]

I lean town on ani. I liked his questions in the early stage, as well as his explanation of his "random" vote, which made perfect pro-town sense.

Anyone can write questions before a game begins, and his explanation for the vote isn't pro-town because policy lynches are bad ideas, no matter what the reason! On top of that, calling one's own play scummy is not bad when there is proof to back this up. Or would you rather have him lie in these all-important questions?

[Slaxx]

I guess ani doesnt realize that I was trying to start up conversation again.

The probably was sarcasm. Thought it was pretty obvious.

[CryMeARiver]

Ok, I am back from my V/LA and I am happy to have been replaced into this game. I thought I'd have Internet access at the Sheraton hotel, but apparently not. Should have a read through done soon enough. Not sure where my vote is now, but for now:

Unvote

[Nikanor]

I have an announcement to make.


Parama is scum.

Carry on.

[Nikanor]

If anyone wants reasoning, it's that Parama is being

waaaay

too confident to be town.

Anyway, I don't get why the kunkstar wagon dissolved so quickly. Anyone care to explain to me why he's town?

[Parama]

If anyone wants reasoning, it's that Parama is being

waaaay

too confident to be town.

Anyway, I don't get why the kunkstar wagon dissolved so quickly. Anyone care to explain to me why he's town?

A lack of confidence = weak reads = I'm not doing a good job as town.
Nothing has changed about kunkstar being scum.

[Nikanor]

Nothing has changed about kunkstar being scum.

My question was obviously not directed at people still voting for kunkstar.

[Starbuck]

Sorry guys, uber busy weekend.

On Parama

It's the only reason you've given.

No, it's not.

Post 124 contains my reasoning for voting you. I'll put it in list form if you need me to.

1. "calling out anyone who disagrees with you."
2. "His sudden suspicion on me in Post 103 for asking for further elaboration"
3. "His overreaction feels like nervous scum. "

None of this is because I dislike your playstyle.

Scum using bad logic and overreacting to my scumlist. Implies that I had one or both of her buddies in my original FoS trinity.

LoL. You wish.

If you think I'm scum, why aren't you voting for me?


You started off with this list...

The scum in this game are kunkstar7, Nachomamma8, and Stethoscope.

of people that you say are scum.

Then you say that...

the scumteam is kunk/Starbuck/Looker.

Why can't you make up your mind?

Ani misreps everything I've ever said without understanding my logic and sides with Starbuck on everything ever.

LOL

On Nicodemus

I completely agree with Nacho in Post 167 that Nicodemus is copping out of scumhunting.

[Parama]

If you don't get it, reads change.
I'm not voting you because kunk is scummier.
There's nothing else worth responding to because your case is a disguised OMGUS.

[Starbuck]

How is it "disguised as OMGUS"?



Reaching much?

[Starbuck]

Also, for the record, I didn't "appear on your scumdar" until I started challenging you.

So therefore, it wouldn't be me who is OMGUSing, but you.

[Parama]

People bury votes under walls of weak reasoning when they don't have a good reason to vote for someone. That is called disguising a vote. And since I put you on my scumlist, you decided to OMGUS me, but you didn't want the OMGUS to be obvious so you gave weak reasoning. That is why your vote is a disguised OMGUS.

Now then.

1. "calling out anyone who disagrees with you."

I'm not calling out everyone who disagrees with me. The ones who do not give a good reason to disagree yet continue to disagree are the ones I am calling out.

2. "His sudden suspicion on me in Post 103 for asking for further elaboration"

This is silly because...

3. "His overreaction feels like nervous scum. "

This is hypocritical.

[Trumpet of Doom]

Bumping vote count.