Mini 950: DCI Mafia (The Results Are In...)

[Parama]

Unvote
Vote: Parama

It would be really awesome if you could drop the egotistical arrogance.

I will be sticking to calling out the scummiest players because it's scumhunting!

You will be sticking to calling out anyone who disagrees with you. That, my dear, isn't scumhunting.

Oh geez, because I gave scum reads, justified them, and defended them!

His sudden suspicion on me in Post 103 for asking for further elaboration doesn't sit well. I mean, it wasn't like I was suspecting him. Just asking for further clarification. His overreaction feels like nervous scum.

The hypocrisy here is stunning. I'm linking you to my reads because you overreacted to them. Makes you look like what you call me.

I've been playing mafia for awhile. I don't understand how ANYONE can have 3 suspects in 5 pages. Maybe 1, but definitely not 3.

And obviously this makes me scummy. Having suspects early in the game = scum! Because obviously townies don't need to name their top suspects straightaway!

This is going to be a loooooong game.

Also,

FOS: Slaxx

for quickly trying to come to Parama's defense. I'm pretty sure Parama can handle his own.

The issue here is that scum defenses are NEVER this obvious. Or... Slaxx is pulling a weird reverse psychology to make me THINK he wouldn't be that obvious because scum aren't that obvious, so it lets him get away with being that obvious, but then it means it's actually really subtle defending, in which case it isn't obvious... my head hurts.
Add to the fact that I'm not scum, and it makes your point irrelevant anyways [/mech]

[Starbuck]

Stating that "you aren't scum" when you aren't cleared, doesn't really do much now, does it?

[Parama]

No, but if I assumed I was scum when making my posts that wouldn't come off too well. All my posts come from a townie point of view!

[Slaxx]

I'm coming to his defense because he has got the game moving again. Why did you not vote until I prompted you to do so in my post?

I am not parroting his reads, I agree with them. They follow a degree of logic. Would you rather me lie and make up some crap that I don't believe just to make myself look better? That's what scum do.

[Starbuck]

You didn't prompt me at all. So stop trying to give yourself credit where no credit is due.

[Slaxx]

I see people trying to hop on a lets bash Parama verbal wagon. He tried to create discussion. It doesnt matter when it is. He tried to get things moving forward.

If you've got a problem, vote for him.

Otherwise just let it go and let his scum reads react. You guys have distracted the entire intent of his post. The only one who has really defended themselves is kunk.

Frankly I agree with Parama's FoSs, although not with the Nacho one.

[NavyCherub]

I agree with Nikanor, kunk's active lurking is making me love my vote on him.

The issue here is that scum defenses are NEVER this obvious.

Neither are scum connections, yet you seem to have had them all down right away, pretty cool.

[Slaxx]

Mainly I'm going off of META of nacho for now. Although he is lurking, which is bugging me a bit.

[Starbuck]

Slaxx, really, there's not enough room in this game for all of us AND your & Parama's egos.

Get over yourselves.

[Slaxx]

That's not a rebuttal or an explanation concerning our argument. That's ad hominem. Would you like to try again?

[Starbuck]

I know it's ad hom, and right now, this discussion is null because I was catching up on the game.

YOU

DID

NOT

PROMPT

ME

TO

VOTE

FOR

PARAMA.

But if it makes you feel better, you can telling yourself that you did. Just drop this stupid distraction.

[Slaxx]

So what was the sudden change in mindset between this:

Parama, the game was dead because it was fucking Easter weekend. I don't expect people to take time from being with their families to play mafia.

and this:

[/quote]Unvote
Vote: Parama

It would be really awesome if you could drop the egotistical arrogance. [/quote]

This discussion is NOT null and it is NOT a distraction. You have come under my suspicion (and vice versa). Where as I want to talk about it and sort through it, YOU just want to dismiss it as nothing. If you seriously FoS me, why do you want to drop our argument?

And what do you mean not caught up with the game? You've been posting consistently for the past few days.

[Starbuck]

What sudden change? There's not really any correlation between the first post you quote and what I said under the vote. Why not read further and not cut and paste things to make yourself look better?

You seem to enjoy reaching. You may want to stretch before you pull a muscle.




I don't catch up on my games in any particular order. I also work. I'm in the military and stationed in Italy. My schedule is chock full this week so I have been getting posts in where I can. I normally have multiple text documents running if I have to catch up on more than one game.

[Slaxx]

I'm not making myself look better. I'm pointing out the fact that you voted for him for the same reason as the previous post, or at least thats the way the post is setup to read. You vote him for being arrogant, and then start backing (or attempting to rather) your point.

[Starbuck]

How so?

He came out and said "These 3 people are scum". I asked him to elaborate and he pretty much blew me off, like it was too much for him to elaborate on how he fingered all 3 scum on page 4. That's arrogance.

[Parama]

This page is a waste of my time, I did not read most of the posts here.

[Parama]

What I mean is:
Starbuck's attacks are based on "ego" which doesn't have anything to do with scum or not scum. The silliness of these attacks is made worse due to the fact that me and slaxx aren't being egoistical at all... we're telling Starbuck why she's wrong!
I don't think anything Navy has said recently has made sense, either. I have no clue what you're trying to imply, sorry. Try again next time!
And I don't want this game to turn into the Starbuck-Parama-Slaxx comedy hour.

[Nachomamma8]

Starbuck, are you fully aware you are voting Parama because you disagree with his playstyle? Are you also aware of the fact that you FoSed someone because they disagreed with you?

Did anyone else notice Ani's active lurking?

Nik, I like your vote. But there are more glorious wagons to be had, wouldn't you agree?

Also, NavyCherub is being painfully protown at the moment. Starbuck, Ani, kink, Looker, and muh are not.

[Trumpet of Doom]

muh316 has requested replacement.

EDIT: Prodding Looker.

ToD Presents: The Best of DCI (Carolina Crown, 2007: Triple Crown)

Vote Count D:

kunkstar7 (5, L-2) - Looker, Parama, Slaxx, NavyCherub, Nikanor

Nicodemus (2, L-5) - animorpherv1/Clank, muh316
animorpherv1/Clank (1, L-6) - Nachomamma8
Nachomamma8 (1, L-6) - kunkstar7
Looker (1, L-6) - Stephoscope
muh316 (1, L-6) - Nicodemus
Parama (1, L-6) - Starbuck

Not Voting (0):

7 votes are required to lynch, 4 at deadline.
If deadline were to hit right now, kunkstar7 would be lynched.

Current Deadline:

Friday, April 16, 2010, ~7:45 AM CDT (GMT-6+1)

[kunkstar7]

After coming into suspicion I have tried to defend myself against an attack that I believe unjustified, and its active lurking?

In any case, I'm having a hard time trying to figure out which side I'm on without bias. Parama was just trying to start discussion, but was reaching with his suspicions. The main point is Parama's sureness of his reads.

@Parama: regarding your 3man scumteams you have called, the intent I get from that post is you are set in your opinion that those are the three scum, lynch them, game over. Yet how can you be so sure of your reads this early into the game with such little interaction?

Did anyone else notice Ani's active lurking?

I don't like Steph's posting either, his last response really just shows he's not interested to me. I liked Nico's posts when he's around, but don't like his lurkiness.

[NavyCherub]

k!

unvote

Vote Looker

for having done nothing yet and going "unnoticed" in this respect for quite a bit.

[Slaxx]

unvote

vote ani

Yeah.

[Slaxx]

Sigh am I actually going to have to push a wagon?

[Stephoscope]

k!

unvote

Vote Looker

for having done nothing yet and going "unnoticed" in this respect for quite a bit.

I voted for him, and I'm waiting to hear a response.

Which, kunkstar, is one of the reasons I disco danced when someone said he/she was waiting for me to "do" something.

[Slaxx]

Join the ani wagon. Its good and stuff.

He has done not much outside the RQS and kind of echo other people's opinions. I know I did that with Parama but I backed up why. Just not feeling his play right now.

So change, for the good of all things.