I moved quickly for the door, but he stopped me.
"Don't worry,"
hohum ~ L-3 (Percy, Jack, ekiM, xRECKONERx)
ortolan ~ L-5 (Vi, Debonair Danny DiPietro)
xRECKONERx ~ L-6 (hohum)
Not Voting:
May I see that game?Locke Lamora 447 wrote:Vi: because that's exactly what I thought about Reckoner.When I played with town-Reck,he never expressed a desire to give up despite being wagoned to claiming on D1. His 'lynch me' post was a clear departure from that and I immediately thought exactly what ortolan did.
ort wrote:I'm also either neutral on or dislike all of Locke Lamora's posts thus far.
I still don't see the lurking, though I didn't get to read him in real time so maybe that's it. And all this personal stuff, I don't like how his suspicion on Vi went into non-alignment attacks like questioning Vi's lynch-resistant essence (what do you call it, authority or popularity that never gets you lynched?) in 420, and ad hom in 421 by saying he dislikes Vi. If he felt this way going into the game, and it should stand to reason that he would based on all this meta he brought up late, he would have addressed this earlier. It all looks suspect to me, coming under pressure and being unraveled.ort wrote:I just isoed kyle, the only scummy thing I noticed is...<snip>...
Which is kind of a weird thing to say.
:balrog:Jahudo 451 wrote:Huzzah!
I'm good at what I do.Jahudo 451 wrote:(what do you call it, authority or popularity that never gets you lynched?)
"Individual seeks to punish opposition with speech from overbearing bore"Vi wrote:I'd love to have DDD lecture you on this.
They don't need to, Professor Paragon. Anyway, it was only one of a few possible ideas on why he'd bring up the idea that you're hard to lynch. But in any case that I can think of, it seemed like reactionary defamation to explain why you aren't lynched here and now. And I don't see that coming from town, even if they're about to be lynched. So let's lynch him.Vi wrote:I don't think anyone who has never played with me (flinter, Jack, kyle99, ekiM, Locke Lamora? in this game) thinks I have much authority.
Well a Locke lynch is quite obviously not happening and the momentum for a Jack lynch (which I'd suggest was never there in the first place) has dissapeared as well. An ortolan lynch on the other hand is new, fresh, and happening and with your support, yes you, we can do this. SÃ, se puede.Zachrulez wrote:I don't have an issue with an ortolan lynch, given the bulk of his posting, the horrible attacks on Vi, and the fact that the suspicion surfaced right after Vi started suspecting him.
I still prefer a Jack lynch though... maybe even a Locke lynch.
I feel like the hohum case keeps getting misrepresented or understood. Let's put it all in the same place.Jahudo wrote:@Vi: Did you elaborate on the "locked on" thing? Is that something hohum has done before? (I can't remember if it was in bebop or another game I should know about)
He didn't say his vote was final in 209. It came two days later in response to Vi, who asked him if his vote was "locked on".ekiM wrote:OK... and what about the strongest points against him? The way he declared his xRx vote final for threatening to replace out, what do you think about that. The way he didn't make that final vote for an hour and felt the need to provide a link to back it up. The way he completely ignored his other suspect flinter replacing out, while throwing the book at Rec for threatening it.
So what does the hour refer to?
As for making a vote final, no I don't think that's scummy. Taking ownership of a wagon the way it stands basically says you stand by your case points and you're open to criticism, wagon analysis, etc later on. I think this is different than sitting on a wagon because you can't use the defense that the hammer occurred before you were ready.
It is a valid contradiction that hohum didn't say he was suspicious of flinter for replacing out, which he could have done even though his reck vote was final. But he did say he wanted to lynch Jack after reck in a recent post, which I can believe is a product of making his reck vote final.
Quite a few people have said they'd support a locke lynch. Maybe it's time for a new chart.DDD wrote:Well a Locke lynch is quite obviously not happening and the momentum for a Jack lynch (which I'd suggest was never there in the first place) has dissapeared as well. An ortolan lynch on the other hand is new, fresh, and happening and with your support, yes you, we can do this. SÃ, se puede.
Which ones please?Jack wrote:Kyle replaced out of this game and another game (where a cop had a guilty on him) with the same message, but he's still involved in games on the site.
I'm sorry I didn't take the entirely hypothetical tied for fifth-largest possible bandwagon, that no one has shown any inclination of actually moving on, seriously. How could I be that silly?ekiM wrote:Quite a few people have said they'd support a locke lynch. Maybe it's time for a new chart.DDD wrote:Well a Locke lynch is quite obviously not happening and the momentum for a Jack lynch (which I'd suggest was never there in the first place) has dissapeared as well. An ortolan lynch on the other hand is new, fresh, and happening and with your support, yes you, we can do this. SÃ, se puede.
...end quote.Debonair Danny DiPietro 456 wrote:"Individual seeks to punish opposition with speech from overbearing bore"Vi wrote:I'd love to have DDD lecture you on this.
...which is one neat graphic more than your average post?xRx 461 wrote:Percy 428: "I'm too tired and drunk to make a post with content... but I'll be damned if I'm not too tired and drunk to make a neat graphic to go with my post"
Juuuuuuuuust checking, but did you read that me vs. Jahudo discussion earlier?ekiM 467 wrote:hohum later finalized his vote for xRx, on no extra evidence, so he thinks what xRx is bad enough to be auto-worth a lynch, final vote, no questions asked.
Jack 463 wrote:Kyle replaced out of this game and another game (where a cop had a guilty on him) with the same message, but he's still involved in games on the site.