Skill006 wrote:Well, its not that I want a quicklynch so that I can get my top suspect killed or not give smash [or other replacment if we have to get one] a chance, I just don't really want a replacement.
Anyhow, I thought you were ok with the phaen lynch at this point. I thought that if we’re ready to lynch, then we should lynch. If you feel something more could be done today, then I don’t mind waiting/discussing more.
My first thought when I posted that was that smashbro could catch up through the night and on day 3 and post his thoughts then, but I forgot that he's a player in the game now and he should have the chance to weigh his thoughts on what's been going.
Even so, I'm not exactly going crazy for a phaen replacment. I feel like we've had a bunch of replacements already and another one wouldn't be a "fresh pair of eyes" as you put it, but a poor victim set to read some 30 pages of text.
Maybe I'm just starting to lose faith in this 'replacment system'
This post seems to scream scum to me. The first paragraph basically says I'm not doing this because it would benefit the mafia, but I'd rather not have a replacement.
Second paragraph just asks a question, not really scummy.
Understandable enough, but I've read through the thread (skimmed a couple of nothing posts
) and so I know whats going on. But you "forgot I was a player in this game now and he should have the chance to weigh his thoughts on what's been going" what do you mean by that? forgot I should put some input in before the end of the day?
So, I'm going back and looking at the case on Skill006, partly because of the recent post, but mostly because i was leaning towards her seeming to be scum before that. So, looking back at her...
Skill006 wrote:RayFrost wrote:Skill006 wrote:@ Skill006 - Are you as good as James Bond (007) at taking down bad guys?
Nope. I stink at taking down bad guys, even when I know their alignment.
^--- can't make good cases / doesn't know when NOT to counterclaim.
This is true. Not encouraging, but true XD
Skill006 wrote:Oh man. This is gonna be a rough game. Everyone is so intelligent. Oh well, 'least everyone has big avatars and good grammar. ^_^
A few of her posts, especially at the beginning, warn that she isn't a good player, and likely won't do very well. Preemptive at trying to cover for lack of stronger cases.
Skill006 wrote:You say I have a different view on how to play/read into things, but I don't really see that, people have actively agreed with some of my views, and you, yourself, have said you don't like how Ray's discrediting my points.
It's not your points or views, just your line of thinking as a town player (assuming you are town). The best example was the eagerness to lynch. Usually town want to wait to lynch somebody, and get more discussion going. With more discussion, you can here what all the town members have to say, where everyone stands, and feel more unified as a town.
Here she even says it's town to wait to lynch, and get more discussion going. contradiction to the post as of late?
Skill006 wrote:I do feel that lots of discussion doesn't help us though, for the reasons jammer posted, but then different people have different views on it, I've seen as much reading through various games where people have wanted to keep discussion going and stated that's a benefit, and others where people wanted to only say anything relevant once out of the RVS to keep from giving scum too much information as well. I guess it depends on playstyles in that sense.
But the game is supposed to be about discussion. Lots of it won't kill us to read. Maybe you put too little faith in your future self, and feel scum will be able to cover their tracks. But it's not as if scum will brainwash us if we don't squish them as soon as we can.
And if we keep lynching someone as soon as we find them scummy, we don't consider that other people can just slip under your skin by agreeing with you. While you're so focused on Ray, you're not really fingering redbox and jmurph's posts, and they can hide under your shadow. Besides, the less townies we can avoid lynching, the better.
Continued saying how talking is good, and lynching quickly is bad. Also she warns to not follow blindly, yet tells me we should lynch phaen now.
Also, (I have no time to go back and get exact quotes, I need sleep) I'd like to point out the voting from Day 1 again. During Day 1, skill puts down 2 votes I believe, and at the end of the day has her vote on no one. It seems like this could be a tactic to not get looked at no matter which way the vote went, with no vote on a town player, she isn't as suspicious.
Then, on Day 2, she has the same number of votes (2) but seems to be pressing for a lynch, rather than sitting back and watching. Her play is a bit inconsistent, and with a lot of people up for lynching, it seems like she is trying to get a policy lynch through because she can.
So I'm going to
vote: skill006
, and leave it at that for the night. Tomorrow I plan on going through to look at a few more players i find suspicious, but I have skill at the top of my list. There are one or two players on the same level of scumminess or close to it, but I'm, just getting a gut feeling that she is the best lynch for the day, along with the evidence.