Porkens wrote:Unvote; Vote: Horror
He's posting in other games but not this one.
Well that seals it for me.
Can you say red flag?horror 170 wrote:PLEASE don't take it out on my replacement. I read my posts and literally said "WTF?"... I think it was because of my lack of sleep/paying attention.
I don't really like this either. This whole train of thought sounds convoluted, to be perfectly honest. Are you making it up as you go along? The way I read this is, "I don't find anyone to be very scummy except for Horror. Please don't hold me to this though, because I am unsure if my feelings are compromised by his real life situations. Maybe if he gets replaced I will re-read him for scumminess, but he should be able to defend himself without me asking it!"Zang 174 wrote:Nobody genneraly look like scum. Horror was the only one who made me think scum but that could just be because of life so if his replacement is just as bad then there's a good chance he might be scum. And i didn't ask him because he shouldn't need questions to be able to defend himself.
I've got to agree with Porkens here. If we don't hold Zang's feet to the fire now then it would be hypocritical to do so later. Zang is all over the place. Maybe, as at least one person has said, this is all null and he just plays this way as town, but the question before you is if you want to have him around until the end of the game.Porkens 182 wrote:With a guy like Zang, you either lynch them right away, or you give them a free pass 'till the end of the game.
I generally like your analytical, more rational posts, but this is a little overboard. Are you really saying Porkens is "worse" (read: scummier) than horror on account of his D1 political stance?Kthxbye 183 wrote:So you guys don't personally want and don't want the rest of us to be able to get a read on Horror's replacement before going into D2? I can't possibly fathom how this is best for town. In fact, this viewpoint is worse than anything we every had on Horror.
Yes, frankly, you are. At least I can see the case against horror clearly. I don't know if you're expecting some sort of major slip, which is relatively rare for the town to come across, but this is a pretty clean case for a D1 lynch. He's either not paying attention to the game, or he's feigning it, he claimed his vote was random, yet he clearly acknowledged he was willingly joining a bandwagon, and, to top it off, he lectures us on cutting his replacement slack.Kthxbye 190 wrote:Am I the only one who is dumbstruck by Budja and Porkens view on lynching Horror?
I understand this, and you're entitled to argue this point as you are doing right now. My argument would be that Day 1 should end when a majority of the players feel as though they have found a player they're comfortable lynching. It should not be artificially extended, and by the same token, it shouldn't be "rushed" in the sense that people on the wagon either have not explained why they're on it or they don't feel as though it's a good enough lynch. The former shows that they aren't paying attention, for better or for worse, and the latter shows that they're either being too passive or delibrately trying to fly under the radar.Kthxbye 190 wrote:I really don't like these 'lynch quickly for a short day 1' or 'lynch the player who posted a total of 9 posts' ideas. They seem very rushed and not helpful. It gives me the impression that you 3 feel day one is utterly pointless in which I have to fully and unequivocally disagree.
I wouldn't go this far. I sense sincerity in Kthxbye's posts. You don't, Spyrex?Spyrex 191 wrote:For the record if this goes through and horror flips a mafia PR [Kthxbye is] dead to rights.
I'm really just about equal at this point; I'll lynch either of these guys.Porkens 197 wrote:Unvote; Vote: Horror
He's posting in other games but not this one.
^^^ makes me want to puke.RedCoyote wrote:Are you always so townie sounding? Seriously, I'm not being sarcastic. I feel like you always sound town to me...Fate 104 wrote:Well we have a month before the deadline, but wagoning an absentee just isn't productive.
I'm serious, in many of the few games I've been in (including this one), I see people randomly accusing people of being scum and they make up scum tells. Many of theese "scum tells" are actually null or even town. For example, Cruelty was accused of lieing but no matter how good the reasoning is, (not) reading the rules is a null tell. I find real scum that kill townies like possibly horror/deathsauce (and welcome!) and I have to admit that if I was one of you I would be tempted to vote for myself.RedCoyote wrote:I don't really like this either. This whole train of thought sounds convoluted, to be perfectly honest. Are you making it up as you go along? The way I read this is, "I don't find anyone to be very scummy except for Horror. Please don't hold me to this though, because I am unsure if my feelings are compromised by his real life situations. Maybe if he gets replaced I will re-read him for scumminess, but he should be able to defend himself without me asking it!"
Fate wrote:Miller claim screams of last minute defense of an otherwise irreparable situation.