Light (0):
Not Voting (4)
kunkstar7 wrote:@water_foul: you just voting pwnman for being a lurker? Would you support a lurker policy lynch?
So what is your view on people or do you feel anyone is scummy for any reason at this point?Light wrote:@Light: So basically 'no comment' on anything? What would you do to move us out of random voting, questioning, and commenting?
i did not say "no comment on anything". Aren't we moving out of RVS now? it seems so.
You should be honoredExcedrin wrote:Your idea fails the "what happens if everyone does it" test. What do you think scumhunting is, apparently lets just not vote, form no opinions, wait for deadline and nolynch?DiscoRoboto wrote:Scumhunt with this amount of information? I was merely seeing if someone was going to say anything mentionable.
The 'what happen sif everyone does it' test? What kinda test is that?You've said a lot of scummy stuff so far, mostly in response to my vote and questions, why haven't you asked any questions or voted? Do you have any opinion about who's scum?DiscoRoboto wrote:Make something else? Discussion about things that matter only happen if someone says something remarkable (which is often something scummy) are you telling me to sacrifice myself to get out of the RVS?
Why havent i asked questions or voted? No good questions to ask regarding people and (like I said in my other game) I'm not really that quick to vote.
opinion about who is scum? No read atm.Yes really. Your play has been exactly the definition of active lurking.DiscoRoboto wrote:Active lurking? No, not really.
Please point me to a place where an universally accepted definition of active lurking is stated.Do you see everything about this game as a big joke?DiscoRoboto wrote:and at the last comment... HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA. Funny guy.
Everything? No. The town atm? Yes.[/quote]
The Third Vote Count "I'm in Disco's Wiki Several Times D:"
EBWOPMcGriddle wrote:Excedrin wrote:Um, no, without power roles you have to strategize and decipher on a deeper level, examine what people say why they said it and what they're trying to do. So the point is, how are you going to find scum by playing passively and waiting? Maybe you already know who's scum? If so, please share your info.Light wrote:look, a game without any special roles given to the townies, i believe would be stupid. if there were no special townie roles, this game would be more of a guessing game than a deciphering/strategical game which i love.What do you think?water_foul wrote:I agree with this so does any one get any scum vibes from any one else or should we exert pressure randomly?Scum are pointing out the flaws in your questioning? So, you're saying that don_johnson, farside22, hewitt, Excedrin and maybe water_foul are all scum (did I miss anyone)? If not, then who specifically that pointed out flaws in your questioning is scum?McGriddle wrote:I just want to know how I am obvscum, other than scum pointing out flaws in my questioning...
DiscoRoboto unvoted hewitt after his attack and is now empty posting out being bored.So you're not part of the town?DiscoRoboto wrote:It would come to bite the town AND me in the ass later.
Unvote; Vote DiscoRoboto
So, my vote for DiscoRoboto is bandwagoning? Did I repeat PaltryExcuse's reasoning for his DiscoRoboto vote? Why do you see DiscoRoboto as an easy lynchee?McGriddle wrote:Vote: Excedrinfor jumping Disco for using "AND" as an attack on Disco, even though he had all this (BS) info on me. He also goes for the easy lynchee, and as soon as a bandwagon begins he seems to hop on it right away, rather than just question and leave his vote out.
Cool. Just cause you're posting doesn't mean you're playing.DiscoRoboto wrote:I'm not playing the game? I beg to differ, sir. I bet I have more posts then many a player in here.
If everyone played like you, then scum would win every game. Why? Because they can sit back and watch people posting youtube links until deadline, then kill whoever they like. Pretty simple.DiscoRoboto wrote:Excedrin wrote:Your idea fails the "what happens if everyone does it" test. What do you think scumhunting is, apparently lets just not vote, form no opinions, wait for deadline and nolynch?The 'what happen sif everyone does it' test? What kinda test is that?
How experienced are you at mafia?DiscoRoboto wrote:Excedrin wrote:You've said a lot of scummy stuff so far, mostly in response to my vote and questions, why haven't you asked any questions or voted? Do you have any opinion about who's scum?Why havent i asked questions or voted? No good questions to ask regarding people and (like I said in my other game) I'm not really that quick to vote.
opinion about who is scum? No read atm.
Active Lurking Wow, I've never seen "I didn't do that because I disagree with the definition!" used as an excuse before.DiscoRoboto wrote:Please point me to a place where an universally accepted definition of active lurking is stated.
Maybe this post could be added to the Active Lurking entry on the wiki.DiscoRoboto wrote:It's better to at least show that I'm reading by posting, then to ignore this completely like some other peeps?
The town is a big joke, haha I'm misleading them and watching them run in circles, lolol this will be easy.DiscoRoboto wrote:Everything? No. The town atm? Yes.
You have no read on page 7 and basically zero posts that are designed to find scum. So, yea, you're not playing, you're active lurking. Postcount isn't much of an indicator.DiscoRoboto wrote:I'm not playing the game? I beg to differ, sir. I bet I have more posts then many a player in here.
Why are you focusing on a minor point instead of doing anything to actually help find scum?DiscoRoboto wrote:Besides, I thought we already established that the 'and' was not a means to differentiate myself from Town in terms of allignment.
Its a start.Excedrin wrote:So, my vote for DiscoRoboto is bandwagoning? Did I repeat PaltryExcuse's reasoning for his DiscoRoboto vote? Why do you see DiscoRoboto as an easy lynchee?McGriddle wrote:Vote: Excedrinfor jumping Disco for using "AND" as an attack on Disco, even though he had all this (BS) info on me. He also goes for the easy lynchee, and as soon as a bandwagon begins he seems to hop on it right away, rather than just question and leave his vote out.
Why do you think it's better to leave your vote on someone else after your top suspect changes?
"for jumping Disco for using "AND" as an attack on Disco, even though he had all this (BS) info on me." What does this even mean? As I stated in a response to DiscoRoboto, I voted based on his active lurking and the fact that he's generally not playing the game. That he sees himself separate from town is suspicious, but it's a minor detail. I also note that you haven't explained your "other than scum pointing out flaws in my questioning..." statement.
Let me explain this for you because you apparently still don't understand, even though multiple people have tried explaining this to you. Nobody is using the word "and" against him. It was briefly brought up because it was a weirdly worded sentence and then dropped. But yet you incessantly feel the need to drag it back up repeatedly, even though it's already done and dealt with. The only one who keeps bringing it back is you.McGriddle wrote:As for Hewitt. I am doing as much as I can with what I have to work with. I am not "overly defending" anyone. I am stating that you guys are a couple VI's for using the word and against him. You think that defending someone from stupid accusations is defending? Well it's not. I don't want a mislynch, and you and excedrin seem to be pushing for one based off of the stupid mistake. You complain he is active lurking, but what about the people who are just lurking?
McGriddles buddying isExcedrin wrote:If everyone played like you, then scum would win every game. Why? Because they can sit back and watch people posting youtube links until deadline, then kill whoever they like. Pretty simple.DiscoRoboto wrote:Excedrin wrote:Your idea fails the "what happens if everyone does it" test. What do you think scumhunting is, apparently lets just not vote, form no opinions, wait for deadline and nolynch?The 'what happen sif everyone does it' test? What kinda test is that?
Well not everybody does, lucky for me, right?. Besides I only do it in early game, so w/evs.How experienced are you at mafia?DiscoRoboto wrote:Excedrin wrote:You've said a lot of scummy stuff so far, mostly in response to my vote and questions, why haven't you asked any questions or voted? Do you have any opinion about who's scum?Why havent i asked questions or voted? No good questions to ask regarding people and (like I said in my other game) I'm not really that quick to vote.
opinion about who is scum? No read atm.
Eh look at my wiki. I don't think this is relevent to anything atm though. I don't get reads on games that bore me.Active Lurking Wow, I've never seen "I didn't do that because I disagree with the definition!" used as an excuse before.DiscoRoboto wrote:Please point me to a place where an universally accepted definition of active lurking is stated.
LOL, I never said that I disagree with the definition,why are you saying that?That's twisting my words. You MIGHT see this as an OMGUS if you will, but I don't care, this is just scummy:Vote: excedrinMaybe this post could be added to the Active Lurking entry on the wiki.DiscoRoboto wrote:It's better to at least show that I'm reading by posting, then to ignore this completely like some other peeps?
I'd rather have people actually show that they're reading. I'm not gonna fluff post, that's even MORE annoying then not posting at all.The town is a big joke, haha I'm misleading them and watching them run in circles, lolol this will be easy.DiscoRoboto wrote:Everything? No. The town atm? Yes.
OMGGGGGGGGGGGGG MAFIA CLAIM!You have no read on page 7 and basically zero posts that are designed to find scum. So, yea, you're not playing, you're active lurking. Postcount isn't much of an indicator.DiscoRoboto wrote:I'm not playing the game? I beg to differ, sir. I bet I have more posts then many a player in here.
Zero posts that are designed to find scum. Like the lurkers here.Why are you focusing on a minor point instead of doing anything to actually help find scum?DiscoRoboto wrote:Besides, I thought we already established that the 'and' was not a means to differentiate myself from Town in terms of allignment.
Because I want to have the last word in this and to have this over with.
It's relevant when you're playing the noob card as hard as you are.DiscoRoboto wrote:Eh look at my wiki. I don't think this is relevent to anything atm though. I don't get reads on games that bore me.Excedrin wrote:How experienced are you at mafia?
But you areDiscoRoboto wrote:I'd rather have people actually show that they're reading. I'm not gonna fluff post, that's even MORE annoying then not posting at all.
So you admit to active lurking? How is it scummy to interpret what you wrote the way I interpreted it?DiscoRoboto wrote:LOL, I never said that I disagree with the definition, why are you saying that? That's twisting my words. You MIGHT see this as an OMGUS if you will, but I don't care, this is just scummy: Vote: excedrin
Seems like you're playing the noob card, "I have no good questions to ask, I don't vote quick, and I have no read!"DiscoRoboto wrote:Why havent i asked questions or voted? No good questions to ask regarding people and (like I said in my other game) I'm not really that quick to vote.
opinion about who is scum? No read atm.
Particularly who is adam and why someone giving you a headache is a good reason to vote for themdon_johnson wrote:hm. i'm with adam.
unvote, vote: excedrin
he's giving me a headache.