Zang wrote:bad and scummy? How do I have bad and scummy reasoning?@Zang: Why are you trying to justify your actions with bad, scummy reasoning?
Because scum are bad. QED. Scum also often use bad/flawed logic in their arguments to try and pass off their own agenda as fact, or reasonable.
Zang: who is scum?my top suspects are sir cyanide and Jack. And the tbm misltnch does make tqo look a lot scumier but I think that he might be town, scum would never risk seeming so stupid.To Zang: Since TBM turned up town, who do you believe to be suspicious going into Day 2? I ask you specifically because everyone else seems convinced your lynch worthy, so your perspective is key right now.
I think we were looking for reasons as well as names. We're going to need more than we're getting from you right now.
it means that I am not dening it and I moved around my vote a lot because they all seemed like they could be scum.@Zang: what does "taking full responsibility for your actions" mean in context? That you admit you moved your vote around a lot, but you don't want to give an explanation for it so we can all suck it?
And yet early you wouldn't vote and instead threw FoS/HoS's out all over the shop? AND you said max 2 out of your 3 suspects could be scum (using reasoning I don't quite follow and I don't believe was ever explained)? Dude, weak.
Bold emphasis mine. Also, EBWOP:
"
240: Again says he finds Zang's quick change of heart unnerving. Picks up on POSSIBLE slip: "Why could only 2 of your 3 suspects be mafia?" (Re: Zang post