Annachie wrote:
Yea right, didn't want a policy lynch.
Btw, Plum's (I believe) was the most recent post on this retcon of yours. I've also posted your own posts calling for the policy lynch after your previous claim of not wanting one.
Would you mind explaining to me where this fits in with my post in the QT where I said I just wanted a wagon and not a lynch? Be sure to include the parts where I said I was trying to have competing wagons on me and CSL to get the game going. (Now would be a good time for Snow_Bunny to come here and back me up that I actually said all this.)
Annachie wrote:
I also note that your in QT post about becoming serious and your in thread post about becomming serious, both of which didn't sound right btw, were on different days.
(QFT: "This is a serious vote." is the comment I took as becomming serious.)
It was a serious vote in the sense of not being a random vote. It was also partially to start discussion over me voting
again
and, better yet, voting for the person I was already voting for. My post in the QT referred to being completely serious.
Annachie wrote:1. Change in play style, scum tell.
2. Retcon history, scum tell.
3. Random or silly play, anti-town.
4. Trying to get a bandwagon on yourself, anti-town.
5. Not claiming, despite being at L-1 twice, anti-town.
6. Managing to vote for both your neighbours, and out them. That can't be good for the town.
(Numbered for clarity)
1. How is that scummy, especially considering I wasn't serious early on?
2. I disagree that I did that.
3. You didn't seem to have a problem with it at the time. In fact, not until I voted you.
4. I don't think it was in the particular game, but I suppose that's arguable.
5. Meh, I guess. I wanted my attackers to at least explain why some of what I did was scummy first.
6. Well I blame you guys for playing scummy enough to earn my vote for the first part. As for outing both of you, you said you didn't care what I did in terms of outing you guys. Besides, it's only bad if we're all town. If I'm scum, only town gained information from my claim.