Mini 891 - British Comedy Mafia (Game Over)

Netopalis · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:50 pm

No, I did explain it. Nobody's responded to my points, and as for being a claimed mason, it seems awfully convenient that you claim it, then use it to defend yourself against the lynch repeatedly. Almost as if you had planned that little tactic.

Either explain why you claimed so close to the deadline or face the rope. I want a good reason, not just that "it was time".

DeathSauce · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:57 pm

I've been thinking about this all day, the only seemingly normal reason for his claim is that it disrupted the Budja wagon, but he was voting for Budja, so that can't possibly be it.

I still vote for "loony"

Netopalis · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:00 pm

Well, whatever the reason, I think we would be remiss for not discussing it some more.

I'm also frustrated at the fact that we haven't heard from Lyman since the 27th, Locke Lamora since the 23rd, Dana since the 21st or Imaginality since the 3rd.

Netopalis · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:02 pm

EBWODP: Just realized that Locke Lamora and Dana are being replaced. Smashing.

Mod: Prods on Imaginality and Lyman, please?

At the very least, we need to wait until these replacements chime in. I hate it when we go to night and scum kills off all the replacements that haven't posted. Really hurts the game.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:08 pm

what makes you think scum would kill lurkers? I would imagine it would be quite the opposite.

Netopalis · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm

No, the point is that someone will get replaced, but before they get a chance to post, they get killed off. It's an effective tactic for scum, since it keeps new content and viewpoints from entering the game.

Budja · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:16 pm

Once more, they are both town.
I can't say this enough.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:17 pm

Budja wrote:Once more, they are both town.
I can't say this enough.

Yep, you're probably right scumja.

Budja · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:18 pm

Then why vote Net then, eh?

Netopalis · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:19 pm

If you believe that, why are you voting for me?

Budja · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:24 pm

Don't steal my question

.

Still waiting on your answer to my other question Deathsauce BTW.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:27 pm

hmmm... easy question, you're both scum. i don't care witch one we lynch. Notice I did indeed vote BOTH of you.

nice attempt at scum hunting.

Netopalis · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:28 pm

BloodCovenent wrote:
Budja wrote:Once more, they are both town.
I can't say this enough.
Yep, you're probably right scumja.

This was referring to me and China, I believe. You say we're both town, but that Budja is scum. Now, you're saying that me and Budja are scum. Your inconsistency baffles me.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:35 pm

nope, pretty sure budja was talking about lyman and imaginality being town. which I do believe to an extent. I was calling YOU Net, and Budja scummy.

Unlike you, i believe China's claim.

Budja · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:41 pm

Nope, Net is right. They are both obv. town.
Lyman is prob town and imaginality is only mildly town slipping towards null.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:51 pm

*facepalm*

DeathSauce · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:56 pm

Budja wrote: Still waiting on your answer to my other question Deathsauce BTW.

Let it go, it was illogical thinking on my part that was later exposed.

Chinaman · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:58 pm

Alright Net, here was my thinking for claiming before night. This isn't really for you as I think your scum, but for those who think you have any sort of logical points on me.

We were seemingly about to lynch Budja. JL has claimed to be able to tree someone. Scum were most likely going to try and NOT let him tree someone and prove himself town. Since we weren't going to lynch him today, I thought he should have a better chance to prove himself town and we would have a confirmed town. Best way for me to do that is claim in my opinion. By claiming, scum now have to deal with 2 people who can confirm themselves town thus tomorrow, the chances are higher we will come in with at least one confirmed or confirmable town. I thought it was a good time to claim and so I did. I do NOT have to play my role how you think I should play it. I thought it was a good move so I took it. As an added bonus, if I die tonight, my partner has a very easy way of proving himself. I think the possiblilty of going into day 2 with provable town is good for us.

Now, please explain to everyone why lynching a claimed mason is a good thing. I don't see it. The only reason you would want to build a wagon on me is to out my partner D1. That is the ONLY possible outcome. You won't lynch me today because if worse comes to worse and I get down to L-1, my partner will out himself. That is the only outcome to you pushing a lynch on me.

Let me make this very clear with CAPS!

ONLY SCUM (or idiot town) WOULD WANT TO OUT MY PARNTER DAY 1.

Only scum Net. Since you are the one pushing this wagon on me, I choose you. If you flip town, then it's another person voting me. Pretty simple. I'm pretty sure it's you though so I'm not worried.

Hell, if it's not you and you fall into idiot town category, Me claiming has made a nice little list of very possible scum. There is at least one scum voting for me right now. Of that I am very certain.

Btw, you saying I would meet the rope made me laugh out loud. There is no possible scenario where I get lynched today. My partner will save me if you somehow convince outing my partner today is good for town. That's it.

Die now scumbag.

Note: I don't like all the lurking. This convo between me, net, budja, bc, and occasionally DS is getting old.

Netopalis · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:10 pm

The only reason that I was wanting to lynch you is because your mason claim made no sense. While I disagree with the play, that is a logical reason, and I'll back off of it. I still think your play is scummy....but I suppose it's not all that farfetched.

I like Budja's play a bit better since the claim...but lynching him will unfortunately provide us with the most information today.

Unvote, vote: Budja

Budja · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:14 pm

About time.

@Net, why?

Netopalis · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:37 pm

Because, unfortunately, we're on a deadline, and I think that you're the only player we'll be able to organize a lynch on before then.

Netopalis · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:38 pm

Unvote

Scratch that, missed the deadline extension. Sorry about that.

Budja · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:59 pm

Feh, only for a couple of days.
I'd like a BC lynch if you'd switch to that (or Locke).

BloodCovenent · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:05 pm

Budja wrote:Feh, only for a couple of days.
I'd like a BC lynch if you'd switch to that (or Locke).

pull up a case, and maybe i'll switch over.

Netopalis · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:13 pm

I was going to make a case after I get back in tomorrow, but it may have to be postponed 'till Friday. No time tonight, unfortunately.