unvote,
did you guys actually buy this?
muh316 wrote:Oh sorry I didnt notice this game *starts watching this topic* there. now im going to read.
muh316 wrote:I had problems with my firefox and had to download it over again. So then I lost this out of my bookmarks. Now that its on my watched list along with my other games ill be more active.
not bloody likely
muh316 in 216a wrote:Im just going to join the wagon because of the deadline. it seemed to pass by so fast. So we should probably just get on a good wagon for now.
Vote Josh Lyman
julienvonwolfe wrote:Your reluctance to wagon is noted.
one of the two are scum, either slow-muh or sneaky-julien.
Debonair Danny DiPietro in 300 wrote:muh316 wrote:I also think a scott lynch would be better because he almost cost us a no lynch. And I think he might be activley lurking to find a way out of this slip. So that people forget about him.
Scott hasn't posted on this site in nine days and it appears he's flaked from two or three other games as well that he was in, that's some real hardcore "active lurking".
Unvote; Vote: muh316
I just skimmed scot's posts in iso. What was his slip supposed to be? I didn't see it.
I think the muh may be one of those people that accuses other people of what he happens to know that he is guilty of: specifically active lurking.
julienvonwolfe in 200 wrote:Josh Lyman wrote:Regarding muh: I just think that the way he phrased it sounded like he was trying to appear innocent, as though he actually hadn't realized the game had started. That is honestly how I parsed his post 188, so I checked his posts; when I found TWENTY of them, I basically lost it. Yes, I have a life, but I do know which games I'm in, whether or not my browser crashed or whatever. I still think his attitude is very anti-town, especially since he promised to be more active; he had two posts within 30 minutes, and now nothing. Can we say "active lurking?" IMO, muh should rectify this. Soon.
unvote
FoS: muh
If you're so sure about your vote on muh, why the unvote?
my guess is that it was because muh and Josh were scumbuddies, and while Josh was pissed at muh for being the weakest link, he didn't really want to lynch him.
vote:muh316
for being a lazy scum player who pissed of his scum-mate Josh, accused Scott of what muh himself was guilty of, for trying to convince the town that his absence was due to bookmarking every game until he was forced to reinstall his browser
then
he magically discovered the "watched topics" function on this forum. Oh, and that weak claim. As a mod I've put in double roles before. The odds of the being two of the same roll in this game are slim, and the odds of the NK victim having the same unusual role as the first person to claim on day 2... incredibly slim. I estimate the odds of muh simply being ballsy enough (his first huge lie seemed to work after all!) to copy that role for his claim when he was forced to claim are much greater.