False assertions... okay, I messed up and thought you voted 5cvm. We've covered this. False excuses is where you lose me. What false excuses?? And I really don't see how this discussion is doing anything but distracting the town because of a misunderstanding. Thus, pointless.Gerhard wrote: This isn't really pointless actually. You're digging yourself into a hole here. First you vote me based on false assertions. Then you retract that vote based on false excuses. Then you dismiss the argument as pointless, when, though not hugely important, it is at least relevant.
>.>Now what you have just shown is a scum slip if I ever saw one. You posted a vote, but only later did you come up with reasons to explain it. You're basing your excuse off of when you explained your vote, not when you placed it.
No. I posted a vote, I explained it.
The "excuse" was in response to "your inclination not to check facts is noted". As in, I didn't double check my facts when i further explained my vote. I didn't. It was 1 am.
You completely lost me.You could pass off the time issue as forgetting who you were voting for, or why you were voting them, but when you placed the vote, you knew what your reasons were. If the time was the issue, you wouldn't have retracted your vote, you would have explained the real reasons behind it, as you were clearly lucid when you made it.
