UK wrote:See, I love how this is. It's a complete misrep of what I said. You act like the late wagon joining itself is the scummy point, whereas it's not. It's the following behavior and the lack of original thought between your switches. Now does it make sense?
UK, I think you actually claimed 2 separate suspicious thing I did -- the first is the subsequent behavior; the second is the bandwagon following itself:
UK wrote:-Worrying too much about appearances (It's not OMGUS if you actually have reasoning, so damn the accusation and go forward. At least if you're townie)
-Bandwagon following (not scummy in and of itself but not very helpful to town)
I, ah, hadn't been noticing the parenthetical on the second point, though. Point taken. But that's why I thought it was appropriate to address it as a separate issue. The first issue is just my playstyle as far as I can tell.
UK wrote:Why did you follow me to SP? Why didn't you vote anyone else? What original reasoning did you have on SP? Or was it just blatant bandwagoning?
Here's the post where I voted SP.
Iecerint wrote:I can get behind an SPwagon. It's certainly better than my current vote, and while I don't want to fully abandon JL, his limited activity would make a JL revote pretty inert. And I trust UK's official information on how to handle the SSK/Vaya situation.
Unvote; Vote: SocioPath.
So the logic was like this:
1. We have a claimed 99% certain guilty on Vaya.
2. UK claims that she has official information that lynching Vaya is not optimal play.
3. UK appears to want to pressure SP.
4. Hey, I'm suspicious of SP, too! He made that crap argument against Vaya! And UK's "official information" claim may further imply that Vaya is likely town!
5. I'll pressure SP, too! After all, UK seems like a nice
man
lady, my vote on SSK is outdated given the information in ILY (and he's claiming daycop, anyway), and JL is out to pasture. No better place for my vote!
6.
Vote
.