Mini 896 - Jekyll Mafia - Game Over

[Gerhard Krause]

1. High

2. I love to be the cop, but scum roles are almost as fun.

3. Purple or teal

4. Pretty much all of you, but not with this account.

[Nachomamma8]

What I don't get about what you just posted was that you seemed to be going on about Gerhard Krause. And if you're saying that you can't read a player, then why are you directing attention to someone else? You're blaming raider for trying to divert attention away from the conversation, which is exactly what you are trying to do now. Do you now feel that Gerhard Krause made a justifiable move by unvoting? If not, why are you trying to put attention on raider?

You're getting all excited about nothing. Of course I'm going to switch my suspects early in the game because we are BARELY on page three. The chance of me catching a scum on page 1 is LOW. So, when something interesting comes up, I'm going to question it. And why am I trying to "divert attention"? By not tunneling and paying attention to someone else?

Yes, I feel he made a justifiable move. But I also felt it was worth questioning. And I'm NOT trying to "put attention on raider", as you keep insisting. I'm questioning actions that seem scummy to me. Do you honestly expect me to let scummy behavior pass because I already have a suspect that I'm questioning?

LIAR! You said it was because of his actions, not wording. Those two are very different.

Are you reading the whole game? In the beginning, the action is what I was originally speaking of. Then, when someone asked me how I could justify future behavior about bandwagons, I answered it was because of the wording.

Kikuchiyo: Random questions annoy me, so... no.

[Budja]

Votecount

3 - raider8169: (Ectomancer, xvart, Nachomamma8)
2 - Nachomamma8: ( MrSuave, PHANTOM)
1 - Ectomancer: (Gerhard Krause)
1 - xvart: (HackerHuck)
1 - PHANTOM: (kikuchiyo)
1 - 5cvm: (raider8169)

Not Voting: Green Crayons, 5cvm, Unity

With

12

alive it will take

7

to lynch.

Deadline:

9th January

5cvm is being prodded

[Green Crayons]

Less quote walls please.

You're going to love me.

Why did you pick those four questions? Why you think it's more beneficial to throw up a prearranged set of talking points than allowing the conversation to naturally flow?

[raider8169]

I was going to unvote but seeing as 5cum or whatever his name is hasnt even shown up yet I think it will stay.

[HackerHuck]

I don't really see what all the fuss is regarding random votes, nor do I really see it as a phase that "ends". There's surprisingly too much discussion about random voting, so I'm glad I missed most of that. I'm not opposed to questions, so I'll join in.

1. My join date is pretty indicative of my experience level, although I have recently come back from a 9 month hiatus.

2. I love to be scum of any kind.

3. I'd prefer not to answer.

4. I've played with Ectomancer, xvart, and GreenCrayons (albeit I'm not 100% on that one.) Apparently, I've also played with Gerhard.

[Nachomamma8]

I don't really see what all the fuss is regarding random votes, nor do I really see it as a phase that "ends".

What do you mean by the second part of that?

[raider8169]

I don't really see what all the fuss is regarding random votes, nor do I really see it as a phase that "ends".

What do you mean by the second part of that?

Most likely that is doesnt just happen. Some people keep their random votes on people for a long time as they just dont see a reason to take them off. In that sense the phase wouldnt end until the last person removes their votes or announces that it is a real vote.

[5cvm]

Hai guys.

3. Favorite color.

Green.

I have role information heavily indicating that Nachomamma8 is a member of the mafia.

[5cvm]

vote: Nachomamm8

[Green Crayons]

I actually gave an audible sigh.



Care to share with the whole class?

[Gerhard Krause]

Role information? So what, you're a day cop?

[xvart]

Jesus. In this game, too? 5cvm is the alt of Milkshake and is an account to just play like a dickhead. His play is going to be calling himself scum and then naming scum partners over and over. Don't expect anything worthwhile from him.

xvart.

[xvart]

Role information? So what, you're a day cop?

No. He's implying that he is scum and the role information is his scum buddies.

xvart.

[Nachomamma8]

5cvm...

ITS NACHOMAMMA8!!!!!

I TOLD YOU THAT AT LEAST 12 TIMES IN PREGAME NIGHTTALK CHAT, SO SPELL MY NAME RIGHT FOR ONCE!!!!

[Nachomamma8]

Whoops, my bad. Meant to post that somewhere else.

[PHANTOM]

Yes, I feel he made a justifiable move. But I also felt it was worth questioning. And I'm NOT trying to "put attention on raider", as you keep insisting. I'm questioning actions that seem scummy to me. Do you honestly expect me to let scummy behavior pass because I already have a suspect that I'm questioning?

You are trying to put attention on raider, or else why did you vote for him? Because he made a scummy move? Ok, that's reasonable, but you are still focusing on him.

And...

5cvm...

ITS NACHOMAMMA8!!!!!

I TOLD YOU THAT AT LEAST 12 TIMES IN PREGAME NIGHTTALK CHAT, SO SPELL MY NAME RIGHT FOR ONCE!!!!

is this a scum-slip, or just a bad joke?

[Unity]

Role information? So what, you're a day cop?

No. He's implying that he is scum and the role information is his scum buddies.

xvart.

ok. I understand what you're saying but not why he would do such a thing. Is that a common role element in these alternate games? You seem very familiar with it.

[Ectomancer]

I don't really see what all the fuss is regarding random votes, nor do I really see it as a phase that "ends".

What do you mean by the second part of that?

Most likely that is doesnt just happen. Some people keep their random votes on people for a long time as they just dont see a reason to take them off. In that sense the phase wouldnt end until the last person removes their votes or announces that it is a real vote.

Nacho asking irrelevant questions and Raider perpetuating. Good vote targets.

[raider8169]

Nacho asking irrelevant questions and Raider perpetuating. Good vote targets.

Seemed obvious to me, besides its the same stuff that is asked in most of the games I am in anyways. I figured I would save some time and just answer it.

Is that really a bad thing?

[Ectomancer]

Yes. You should have voted Nacho instead.

[kikuchiyo]

Why did you pick those four questions? Why you think it's more beneficial to throw up a prearranged set of talking points than allowing the conversation to naturally flow?

No particular reason.

I don't.

Just trying to stimulate something. Finding out everyones experience level and familiarity with other players can be helpful. At the very least it helps us find out whose going to be helpful and polite and whose going to be assholes.

That said:

unvote, Vote: Nachomamma8

[5cvm]

No. He's implying that he is scum and the role information is his scum buddies.

Xvart's just a little bitter because I know he's scum in a different game. In this game, though, I'm town and I even have a power role! He just can't accept my brutal honesty. I love you though, xvart. Every bitter, tough-guy-over-the-internet part of you. Never change. <3

Role information? So what, you're a day cop?

Actually no (I do have an ability, but I don't have to use it and happens during the night). This is much more "static" information that I have about just one other player. My info is slightly based of flavor, but I'm about 80-90% positive because of it. I also read his early posts and it just fits. Maybe he even DID have pregame nighttalk chat and that's what made him think of the joke. ^^ ("It'll make me look town!")[/quote]

[5cvm]

unvote, Vote: Nachomamma8

Def. more of this.

[raider8169]

unvote, vote Nachomamma8

If he is lying then we caught scum with him. Either way its a step in the right direction.