Mini 891 - British Comedy Mafia (Game Over)

[BloodCovenent]

Lyman: Please ask for mod clarification on the flip issue.

BC: I can't predict what roles will be present, but I DO know that scum in general like safer claims that are more close to the norm. If his action doesn't go through either from the fact that he's scum or he's roleblocked, then we're no worse off lynching him tomorrow than we are lynching him today.

It gives him one more day of life, and his team one more day, considering if we myslynch, then we would be worse off today (if he were scum).

[Netopalis]

...and

Vote: BloodCovenant

. You sound like you're rather desperate to get rid of Lyman and prevent his role from achieving fruition.

[Budja]

^ Agreed. BC's objections are a bit too overdone from my liking.

unvote, vote BC

[Josh Lyman]

Waiting on Mod answer as to flip.

[Josh Lyman]

Waiting on Mod answer as to flip.

Yes, there will be a flip.

[MacavityLock]

Unvote

for the moment. I need to dig in to the last couple pages, which judging from a skim, have been eventful.

[Fuzzyman]

Had a bad LA. Rereading right now.

[Fuzzyman]

unvote, vote Fuzzy

for such a weak attempt at pushing a bandwagon on yourself .

Did you vote me because I was supposedly doing that, or becuase I was supposedly doing that "weakly"?

--

JL, do you have the ability to do that to yourself?

--

Budja, how is Snow Bunny's case WIFOMy?

[BloodCovenent]

...and

Vote: BloodCovenant

. You sound like you're rather desperate to get rid of Lyman and prevent his role from achieving fruition.

*facepalm*

Unvote:
Vote: Budja

Why do you always vote immediately after someone else?

[ortolan]

Sixth vote count

Budja (3): Josh Lyman, Snow Bunny, BloodCovenent
Josh Lyman (2): Fuzzyman, Chinaman
BloodCovenent (2): Netopalis, Budja
Snow_Bunny (1): jasonT1981

Not voting (3): ConfidAnon, Locke Lamora

7 to lynch

[Josh Lyman]

JL, do you have the ability to do that to yourself?

You people ask A LOT of questions, do you know that? (Oh, wait...that's the point, huh? )

Checking with Mod.

[Netopalis]

Even if he has the ability, I wouldn't recommend it. The benefit of this will be having a confirmed innocent scumhunter, and I doubt that if Lyman were in that position the town would follow his lead.

[Fuzzyman]

Yeah, he hasn't really shown himself as a scumhunter yet.

Any reason we still have that random vote, Jason?

[BloodCovenent]

Even if he has the ability, I wouldn't recommend it. The benefit of this will be having a confirmed innocent scumhunter, and I doubt that if Lyman were in that position the town would follow his lead.

so who would you suggest?

[Netopalis]

Imaginality...I think he's probably our best pick, given the limited set of players that we have. Alternatively, I guess that I could always replace out and see about setting something up with a player you folks would trust more, having them replace me and then Lyman using his ability...

[imaginality]

Even if he has the ability, I wouldn't recommend it. The benefit of this will be having a confirmed innocent scumhunter, and I doubt that if Lyman were in that position the town would follow his lead.

I disagree slightly with this. In my view, the vig shot element is more useful than the confirmed-innocent-scumhunter element. That is, assuming it's 9 town vs 3 scum at the moment, I think we're in a better position with:

9 town vs 2 scum (and 1 treestumped scum who town can simply ignore from that point)

than

8 town (and 1 treestumped townie who can help the town scumhunt) vs 3 scum

First scenario gives us 3 mislynches to lylo, second gives us 2 mislynches to lylo.

I do agree that if we have a pool of suspects of roughly equal scumminess at the end of today, then we should target whichever of them is most likely to be able to help us scumhunt.

@Mod, two questions.

Supposing Josh does have the ability he claims:

1. If he targets someone tonight who is targeted for a kill, is that player killed or treestumped?

2. If he treestumps someone tonight who has an investigative role, does that player get the results of their action?

If the answer to 1 is that the player is treestumped instead of killed, it is probably best not to announce who Josh is targeting, in the hope of getting in the way of the scum nightkill.

[Netopalis]

I'd maintain that while there is 1 fewer lynch if he does hit scum, the chances of him hitting scum is fairly low, while the chances of hitting correctly with a lynch if we did have a solid, confirmed player directing the town is much, much higher. Still, this is a matter of opinion...

[Josh Lyman]

I have received word that I cannot target myself with my unusual ability.

[Budja]

Why do you always vote immediately after someone else?

Because.

You are too much against Josh claim for my liking (I really doubt its fake) and I wasn't super keen on you before.
No, its not much but its a better spot for my vote.

[Netopalis]

Unvote, Vote: Budja

And that's a blatant copy of what I was saying.

[Budja]

BC's accusation is a bit hard to swallow .

^before your vote.

I'll admit that your vote did encourage me further to vote, but I was beginning to lean in that direction already.
(and Net, why so late to "call me out". I voted right at the top of the page, you know.)

[Netopalis]

I was hoping you had something further to say on the matter rather than just parroting my opinion.

[ortolan]

Seventh vote count

Budja (4): Josh Lyman, Snow Bunny, BloodCovenent, Netopalis
Josh Lyman (2): Fuzzyman, Chinaman
BloodCovenent (1): Budja
Snow_Bunny (1): jasonT1981

Not voting (3): ConfidAnon, Locke Lamora

7 to lynch

I am changing the ruleset- please address all mod questions to me via PM. However the answer to imaginality's questions is obviously "no comment".

[Snow_Bunny]

More Budja votes, please.

[jasonT1981]

Sorry, I have had a long shitty week and have not even been near a computer to post, let alone catch up. I promise a full and complete catch up on things tomorrow by evening (uk time) at the latest.


Again, I am sorry. This is my first chance to check into this game, and MS as a whole for the best part of a week.