fuzzylightning hasn't posted in 8 days, haha. And only appeared on page 9.fuzzylightning wrote:I would like to hear from the rest of the lurkers out there.
fuzzylightning sounds sacred to give something a way, definitely NOT a town read.
fuzzylightning hasn't posted in 8 days, haha. And only appeared on page 9.fuzzylightning wrote:I would like to hear from the rest of the lurkers out there.
While I agree with you I did not see much if any of a difference. You tunneled on Sir Chris if I remember right, in my previous posts I said when, dont have time right now to find it. You were shrugging off my attacks/down playing them. This is all scummy behavior. Do not think for a second that I will only go after one issue at a time. If there are more issue I will stat them as well. I do not try and withhold part of my case to stretch it out.DragonsofSummer wrote:To answer the one question in your post, similar behavior is not necessarily scummy for two different people. Point out where I have tunneled and I will explain why its not. It doesn't seem I can win with you, either I am tunneling by defending myself from accusations, or I am just "shrugging" off what my attackers are saying by giving it minimal notice. You can't have both, pick the one you want and stop attacking me for the other.
Your "opinion" was calling out one of many people doing the same thing you were doing. He did not put his opinions on other people but your post in calling him out was also the first post you did that as well. You still have not said anything on anyone other then him. Seems your focus is now defending and you dont seem to care about anything else. How is anyone mischaracterizing you for calling someone out for lurking when you were lurking yourself?DragonsofSummer wrote:You call me calling out Chris for lurking scummy because I was lurking too. Fine, but at least I was putting my opinions out there on someone. Which I did not feel he had done. Which was my actual case, not the lurking itself, and I would appreciate if people would stop mischaracterizing what I did.
If you have opinions of other players you need to post them or at least on the players you find scummy. Otherwise, besides the fact that they mean nothing, they dont exist and you are just saying that to appease everybody. It doesnt work. If that is your game style then you are only hurting town by not expressing your opinions on other players and you are better off lynched then holding back information or thoughts.DragonsofSummer wrote:Also note, that when I am attacking a player for what I feel is scummy my thoughts on other players is not nearly as important though they are there, and I don't feel the need to divulge every thought I have about the rest of the players in this game to stop giving the impression that I am tunneling. If thats how you see it, you and I just have a different view of how to play the game, its as simple as that.
Doesn't really bother me if DGB thinks I am scum, he might change his mind if I am alive as the game goes on, he might not, we shall see.Papa Zito wrote:You're #2 on DGB's scumlist.wolframnhart wrote:Hey all, sorry for the lack of posting on my part, I put this game on back burner (which is sad since I am only playing one other) and i need to catch up and re-read some of the pages. Is there anything anyone wants me to talk about/give opinion about inparticular?
This means you're probably going to die.
So sorry.
And who is Sir Chris referring to in the post that saber is referring to? It clears whoever saber is defending, if saber flips scum. That's why it's of interest.RayFrost wrote:saber's post
As much as I am going to regret this, I am pretty sure he was talking about me DGB.DrippingGoofball wrote:In this post, http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 37#1993137
Who is Sir Chris referring to?
Either zwets is bullshitting...or...he's bullshitting. My quote that DGB quoted was AFTER her original list was posted... which means zwet literally hasn't been paying attention the entire game and is just now trying to throw the blame somewhere before he gets wagon'd. Lawl. Zwet is obviously scum, especially after such feeble attempts to post "content". Let's lynch him already.zwetschenwasser wrote:xReckoner is my top pick for scum for the quote DGB beat me to.
Great, if saber is scum you're town.DragonsofSummer wrote:As much as I am going to regret this, I am pretty sure he was talking about me DGB.
Yeah well now he's totally caught scum. Normally he just likes to not play the game, and steal the hammer-joy from those that put in an effort.DragonsofSummer wrote:On which note, zwet obviously is not going to do anything even remotely helpful in this game because we have given him opportunity, and he has time and again done nothing.
There's more than one?xRECKONERx wrote:I was more prodding to figure out who you thought the scum-teams were in that list.
Lol, not the best of logic, but it'll have to do for now, considering you don't have anything else to go on.DrippingGoofball wrote:Great, if saber is scum you're town.DragonsofSummer wrote:As much as I am going to regret this, I am pretty sure he was talking about me DGB.
I see all kinds of connections from playing on so many scumteams.xRECKONERx wrote:No, I mean, where do you see the connections?
WOW. That sounds extraordinariscummily awkward.xRECKONERx wrote: Who would be your potential scum teams. Not that there are more than one in the game.
Even if I was scum, there's no way I'd have that information.
My bad, it looked nicer in word but copy and paste wasnt my friend. Plus I forgot to preview it first.DrippingGoofball wrote:raider8169 - use the paragraph spacer, dammit! You're UNREADABLE!!! SCUM!!!!
Wrong, just wrong. I evaluated people as I went and posted that information on what I thought was note worthy at the time. You have already tried to accuse me on this once and I proved you wrong and so you are going to try again? Tell you what, prove me wrong and show how I have been guilty of the same.DragonsofSummer wrote:@Raider: I feel my thoughts on you are pretty clear right now. You are guilty of the same things you are accusing me of, and as such should by your logic be voting yourself. I think you and I have a different definition for what tunneling is, and that may be part of the problem.
I have.Iecerint wrote:DGB, I replaced malthusis. Have you finished reading the thread by now?
They are all serious.Iecerint wrote:Are any of your scumreads serious enough that you could explicate them for me?
The stock that one may attribute to Day1 scumtells.Iecerint wrote:I just don't know how much stock you've placed in them.
Check my scumlist! It's a criteria. Mostly for zeroing in on townies.Iecerint wrote:Have any of the arguments by other players in the game so far been particularly reasonable or bogus?
The real question is, 'what is the probability that he will fakeclaim?' I don't think it's really worth waiting, he has totally given up defending himself. Like the good little caught scum that he is.Iecerint wrote:What do you think is the probability that zwet will claim if L-1'd?
Let's not waste time. This is a big game. Lots of players.Iecerint wrote:No one should lynch zwet just yet. However, it's OK to L-1 him. If he's at L-1 and you want to hammer him, please type "Hammer" in bold for me.