That certainly would be true if you're scum.cateraction wrote:So I'm scum no matter how Vaya flips then? Hmm.
But there are no reveals unfortunately.
So why don't you tell us now if you're town or scum. We'll start with that.
That certainly would be true if you're scum.cateraction wrote:So I'm scum no matter how Vaya flips then? Hmm.
This post was what got my attention at first. I don't see anything wrong with saying someone is town like that, it seems like a weird thing for a townie to sincerely be concerned about. His reaction to it felt odd and a bit artificial to me. This gave me a slight town read on him. In addition to that now though...jasonT1981 wrote:Will get a full catch up tomorrow. Just home from a night out and it is 3AM But this I find to be a very bold statement. And I actually agree with MordyS suspicionsDrippingGoofball wrote:Psychologic is town, actually.
One thing I know... if DG was scum.. He would know Psych is town.
other scenario is masons as has been said I believe... but why would they out themselves so early in a game?
I could see this as potential buddying up though
Of course I can remember what I said, I just didn't have time to type it out again. I said I'd explain it again anyway, I don't see how this could bother you.jasonT1981 wrote: Ah, Vaya is back, about time...gives a town to scum list posting with a vote for cateraction claiming she 'lost' her post on everyone, sorry not buying that at all. You should be able to, from memory remember quite a bit of it, at least main bullet points against each person.
Awful, just piling bad points on to the popular target. You have no reason to think I'm lying about losing my explanations, and I said I'd post my cases later, you never even gave me a chance to get around to it.jasonT1981 wrote: Nice questions by CDK which he asks for reasons why Vaya thinks he is scum... she replies with she cant as she dont have time.... so, lost notes... now cant post the case when asked? Not liking this one bit at all now.
jasonT1981 wrote:cateraction can not understand the Vaya wagon? Distancing himself from it maybe?
I wouldn't be surprised at all to find out that this guy's scum with cater either.jasonT1981 wrote:unvote
vote: Vaya
Major FOS on Cat though, seems he wants to distance himself from a Vaya lynch.
How'd I guess that someone would try to write off my reasoning as OMGUS? I don't see why I can't point out how I find someone's jumping on the one wagon I know is on town scummy. Yes I targeted him mainly due to his most recent post, because it reeked to me of scumminess.Psychologic wrote:Vaya, your case on jasonT1981 is mainly based on his case made on you in post 227.
Your case reeks of OMGUS, and I feel you only targetted him due to his most recent post.
Unvote. Vote: Vaya.
Jason was at the top of my scumlist, as in he was the least scummy of the people there. My original read was only a slight scum read based on one thing he said that bothered me, mentioned above.Vaya wrote:This post was what got my attention at first. I don't see anything wrong with saying someone is town like that, it seems like a weird thing for a townie to sincerely be concerned about. His reaction to it felt odd and a bit artificial to me.jasonT1981 wrote:Will get a full catch up tomorrow. Just home from a night out and it is 3AM But this I find to be a very bold statement. And I actually agree with MordyS suspicionsDrippingGoofball wrote:Psychologic is town, actually.
One thing I know... if DG was scum.. He would know Psych is town.
other scenario is masons as has been said I believe... but why would they out themselves so early in a game?
I could see this as potential buddying up though
Where's your case on cateraction? ortolan? And most of your case on jason occured AFTER his most recent post, and largely based on it. He was already among your 1/3 scummiest players.Vaya wrote:Town
Psychologic
MordyS
Townish
milkshake
Iecerint
DrippingGoofball
populartajo
DragonsofSummer
Scummy
jasonT1981
curiouskarmadog
ortolan
cateraction
Vote: cateraction
That's because, as I've said repeatedly, my jason read was only a slight scum read before his last post. If I explained my read before that post, I wouldn't have had to much to say. That's why most of my read is based off of his post after my initial comment.DrippingGoofball wrote:And most of your case on jason occured AFTER his most recent post, and largely based on it. He was already among your 1/3 scummiest players.
I really don't get why this bothers people. I like the way Iec explains it, he seems to understand where I'm coming from. Jason was basically a null read, slightly leaning scum based on one odd thing he did before. If I had put a neutral category in my list, he'd have been in it towards the bottom, and I wouldn't have had too much to say about him when I explained my read.curiouskarmadog wrote:then I read Vaya's "case" against Jason, which had a ton of after the fact information...super scummy.
Sorry, I'll explain why I thought that soon.curiouskarmadog wrote:also vaya....still waiting on reasons my I am on your scum list....
How exactly would you detect whether someone authentically believed or didn't believe vayalurking-is-scum? How exactly does one internalize reasons? This milkshake post concerns me. It sounds like he's doing to jasonT what he accuses jasonT of doing to Vaya. (Of course, he's not putting jasonT at L-1, which might make the difference).milkshake wrote:jasonT is my new addition to my top suspects for jumping on the Vaya wagon so late in its journey. I really don't know if he actually believe the whole vayalurking-is-scum thing. He seems more like he's copying previous reasons without internalizing them. And it's the L-1 vote. Vaya is so not worthy of a L-1 vote.
milkshake wrote:Hm. I thought I was making original comments on jasonT not recylcing them... MordyS you just keep saying things!
Vaya wrote:That last post of his [jasonT] was just awful. He does nothing but follow and agree with all the popular targets and doesn't seem to offer much of any original though.
Did you really think that? Cause like -- you weren't. Also, wanna answer my questions?milkshake wrote:jasonT is my new addition to my top suspects for jumping on the Vaya wagon so late in its journey. I really don't know if he actually believe the whole vayalurking-is-scum thing. He seems more like he's copying previous reasons without internalizing them.
Also, wanna answer my questions?
These "questions" are just my post put into question form.How exactly would you detect whether someone authentically believed or didn't believe vayalurking-is-scum? How exactly does one internalize reasons?