Open 183 - Polygamist Mafia (Game Over!)

[DeathNote]

Step by step replay of Death Note The Lynchable's copy and paste:

1) I highlighted the entire QT
2) right clicked on the blue highlight and clicked copy
3) pulled up mafia thread Polygamist Mafia
4) Clicked post reply
5) right clicked on big open white spot and pushed past
6) highlighted entire quote again and clicked quote where the icons are
7) deleted any line that Dramonic had written as well as the post count
8) clicked submit
9) got a bag of doritos and put in "Across the Universe"

[SensFan]

Yeah, bullshit. Highlighting the whole QT will highlight the names of the people as well, and you don't mention deleting them. And there's no way that "deleted the post count" can even begin to mean "deleted the post count, and the names since they were on the name line"

[Chaco]

The confirms my vote in all honesty.

[SensFan]

For my sake:

Yankee, copy-paste the QT conversation you had with Death in any way you like. Make sure to include all dialogue, timestamps, and names of people posting.

[DeathNote]

Sorry Yankee... they just going to have to learn the hard way... unless they are scum then good job so far!

[SensFan]

DeathNote, either you are Scum, or you have blatantly lied.
Repeatedly.
Even when given chances to correct yourself.

[Chaco]

Also, lol, the context of the QT refers to 3 people!

"I thought

Deathnote

was my lover are you a

replacement

?"
"I love you

Yankee

...so much"

It implies three people so heavily.

[DeathNote]

Also, lol, the context of the QT refers to 3 people!

"I thought

Deathnote

was my lover are you a

replacement

?"
"I love you

Yankee

...so much"

It implies three people so heavily.

no.... my name is hatesagi in the QT threads...

[Chaco]

Well, adding names would've helped that portion, no?

[DeathNote]

Forgive my lack of computer skills

I wish more people where on tonight...

[SensFan]

You have lied, DeathNote.

There is literally no way to (without splicing up the post, which you claim you didn't do) to highlight every part of all those posts, and not get the names of the people who posted them.

[Yankee]

Yankee 7
11-12-2009 10:43 AM ET (US)

lol, good luck to you too

hatesagiPerson was signed in when posted 5
11-11-2009 02:36 AM ET (US)

I am DeathNote. This is just my name for all my QTs. Sorry if I confused you... :/

I don't know what we could talk about pre game as we don't know anything yet... but I will wish you good luck!!!
Yankee 4
11-11-2009 01:03 AM ET (US)

lol! you too..... Also, i thought it was DeathNote as my lover, are you a replacement or something?
hatesagiPerson was signed in when posted 3
11-11-2009 12:09 AM ET (US)

I love you Yankee... so much.

Just copied and pasted and took out anything said by dramonic. And i was confused because his name is not deathnote in the QT.

[Yankee]

by the way, i use a mac (if you cant tell) so it may not copy and paste the same way as a windows. I say this because it looks alot different in my post then anyone elses....

[DeathNote]

You have lied, DeathNote.

There is literally no way to (without splicing up the post, which you claim you didn't do) to highlight every part of all those posts, and not get the names of the people who posted them.

Wow... a mighty accusation. This seems like a fairly silly thing to lie about if you ask me.

[SensFan]

Then why the fuck are you doing it?

Seriously, Death. What you claim to have done is

literally IMPOSSIBLE

.

[DeathNote]

Then why the fuck are you doing it?

Seriously, Death. What you claim to have done is

literally IMPOSSIBLE

.

I can't tell if your actually angry of just pressuring me for answers. I sure hope this isn't getting the better of you. I can assure you that I am not lying. I stated what I did and do not know why I am missing names. Let me know when your satisfied with my answers.

[Chaco]

Do it again. Copy and paste it.

[SensFan]

Then why the fuck are you doing it?

Seriously, Death. What you claim to have done is

literally IMPOSSIBLE

.

I can't tell if your actually angry of just pressuring me for answers. I sure hope this isn't getting the better of you. I can assure you that I am not lying. I stated what I did and do not know why I am missing names. Let me know when your satisfied with my answers.

You don't seem to get it. What you claim to do is literally impossible. Not unlikely, or really hard. Impossible.

But yeah, do it again.

[Nikanor]

Nikanor

11-10-2009 08:31 PM ET (US)
Whooo! Hey lover! <3
Most important thing: What do you think about claiming day one? I think a massclaim first thing is probably the best way to go. How about you?

DarkLightA

11-12-2009 10:19 AM ET (US)
Sorry, I didn't realize that this was up. Claiming day one is probably best. Do you know anything about the other players?

-DLA

Aaaand I didn't get online until just now today, so that's all our QT says for now (barring mod talk). I have a suspicion DLA is going to be a lurker.

[Nikanor]

But yeah, do it again.

This.

[dramonic]

You look at your watch. 7:33.

"I don't love you..."

The Second Count: 7:33

Deathnote (3): Chaco, Sensfan, Adel

Not voting (9): DeathNote, saberwolf, ZazieR, Cuetlachtli, Nikanor, Yankee, DarkLightA, SpyreX, Yabbaguy

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!
Deadline is December 3rd

[ZazieR]

Zaz

11-12-2009 11:14 AM ET (US)
Good thing of a mass lover claim:
Due to everybody being lovers, you'll have to focus on multiple players. For example, Saberwolf may act scummy, but his claimed lover Sensfan has been extremely pro-town. Both share the same allignment. By killing one, the other will die too. So will you vote scummy SW, while knowing it will kill very likely townie SF as well?
This question is very important and with a mass lover claim, we can focus on it a lot.

The negative thing is that the claims are out, meaning that the scum have to keep their fake claims up. This might result in less information from the scum.

Cuetlachtli

11-11-2009 02:53 PM ET (US)
What is the point of a mass lover claim if everyone claims monogamist? What are our alternatives?

Zaz

11-11-2009 07:09 AM ET (US)
As said by Dram, we're dealing with 4 town pairs and one group of scum, consisting out of four members.
This is basically a lovers set-up. And in both, it's important that you look at connections. Because if one scum die, they all die. Meaning that the scum will be more careful, which is what we should use in our advantage.
Another thing that might be useful is meta. As said, if one dies, all scum die. It might be possible that some players adjust their playstyle for this reason. The scum also might give tips to each other to help each other out after they may not talk in the QT anymore. This is another reason why meta may be useful.

Also, don't lie low. Our objective is catching scum, not surviving.

Some other things:
-I know from Sens that he likes to random lynch a player in the Lovers set-up. He might do this as well in this game.
-Adel uses Vote Counts to look for scum in polygamist games as it can show possible connections.
-The scum will most likely use the 48 hours to make two pairs in case a mass lover claim comes.
*Also, about this, can you state here if you're in favor of a mass lover claim and why?
-Every player has only 48 hours to talk in their QT's, including the scum. This may be useful during the game as we can ask what each claimed pair has discussed during pregame. Townie pairs will speak the truth, the two scum pairs will most likely have to fake it. This is what happened in a previous polygamist game.
This should only be used after a mass lover claim.

Can't think of anything else right now.

Cuetlachtli

11-11-2009 05:39 AM ET (US)
The polygamist PM ends with "you win when your group composes at least half the town." Therefore, the soonest that the polygamist can win is Day 3.

I say we lay low during the beginning and hope one of the 6 polygamist makes a mistake. Thoughts?

Cuetlachtli

11-11-2009 05:29 AM ET (US)
So there are 12 players. Dramonic's example PMs imply that the monogamist teams consist of 2 players, while the polygamist teams consist of 3 players. So if these numbers are true, then there should be 2 teams of polygamist and 3 teams of monogamist. Or: 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 12.

Cuetlachtli

11-11-2009 12:09 AM ET (US)
Ahoy! So this is my first "lovers" game. Do you have any strategic plans in mind?

Deleted post numbers and mod posts and I made some space between the different posts.

[DarkLightA]

Chaco 11-10-2009 08:43 PM ET (US)
Sup Sens?

Sens 11-10-2009 08:43 PM ET (US)
Not much. You?

Chaco 11-11-2009 06:58 AM ET (US)
Just sick. So anything you want to know, need me to know before we start?

Sens 11-11-2009 12:30 PM ET (US)
Don't post until I do when the thread opens. Trust me, I have a plan.

Chaco 11-11-2009 08:59 PM ET (US)
Care to enlighten or are we going about this blindly?

Chaco 11-12-2009 04:59 PM ET (US)
So you're essentially saying we can quote you and auto clear ourself? Not cool.

I already cleared this plan with the Mod. Above, I quoted (timestamps included) everything in the QT between Chaco and I, with the mod's posts removed. I expect everyone to do this in their next post.

With love,

Sens

I sense something wrong with that post:

In the beginning, the first two posts are posted in the

same minute

, where the second post answers the first post. This second post takes 20 hours to answer though. I smell some editing. :S

Chaco #
11-10-2009 08:43 PM ET (US)

Sup Sens?
Sens #
11-11-2009 01:13 AM ET (US)

Not much. You?
Chaco #
11-11-2009 06:58 AM ET (US)

Just sick. So anything you want to know, need me to know before we start?
Sens #
11-11-2009 12:30 PM ET (US)

Don't post until I do when the thread opens. Trust me, I have a plan.
Chaco #
11-11-2009 08:59 PM ET (US)

Care to enlighten or are we going about this blindly?

Chaco #
11-12-2009 04:59 PM ET (US)

So you're essentially saying we can quote you and auto clear ourself? Not cool.

Oh, right, it changes there, huh?

Vote: Sens

You have some explaining to do.

Aaaand I didn't get online until just now today, so that's all our QT says for now (barring mod talk). I have a suspicion DLA is going to be a lurker.

Just because I'm in a different time zone to you and that I'm asleep when this starts doesn't mean I'll lurk..

[ZazieR]

Yabba

- Have you ever selfvoted before and if you haven't why did you do so this time?

[SensFan]

Whoops, my bad, Darklight.

In case it wasn't obvious, to avoid the messy formatting of a straight copy-paste, I did that first one in bits, one by one.

Mind giving me a reason why I would purposefully change a timestamp to respond to a QT instantaneously?