Eh. A cop should never, ever investigate a useless lurker. That's just a waste of a cop investigation; if the person comes up guilty, then it's worthless because they would have been lynched anyway, and if the person comes up innocent, then the cop ends up having to claim and probably get nightkilled just in order to prevent a useless lurker from being lynched.Jahudo wrote: One solution I'm hoping for is a role to take care of the situation, like a cop or vig, but if I feel there is no better lynch at deadline I will join her wagon. I don't have a reason to believe she is town, but I have reasons to place other people ahead of her in my scumlist.
If someone's a useless lurker, you don't waste a cop investigation on them; most cop investigations will come up innocent, so it's best to use them on people who will actually be useful if they become a confirmed innocent. It's better to just lynch them and investigate someone else.
[/quote]What about my attacks?Yosarian2 wrote:Your attacks, your whole behavior today, really seems off to me, Jahudo.
Most of them kind of seem to be coming out of left field. Your original reaction to the Seraphim claim seemed a little strange to me. You also went through kind of a weird thought process in trying to figure out who made that day-kill, in a way that didn't really seem town to me; it seems like you're assuming the daykiller would come on, post in the thread, and make the day-kill at exactly the same time, when of course, if the second daykiller is scum, it would have made more sense for him or her to make the daykill without posting so as to be less conspicuous. Based on that weird logic, you then decided the daykiller had to be "Cobalt, Monkey, or Yos", and you've been sticking to that ever since.
I'm also getting a vibe that you were trying to manipulate me into getting into a fight with Monkey and/or Snow_Bunny, by trying to force me to create a case against them; I'm really wondering if you were trying to stir up a fight there, possibly to derail me from attacking Xofelf.