Yey, notes! And Ill teach Kast how to make a post that its actually readable.
Page 1.
Not much, only confirmations. Kirbyyoshi seems to be too eager to play.
Page 2.
-Spyrex gets town points for suggesting no actions should be PMed. Further transparent posts confirm my town read on him.
-Kast is also ok, kinda picky with Spyrex. Nuwen is also ok. Chamber is being polemic and lots of facepalms. Dunno what to make of this.
Page 3.
Nuwen wrote:If a player damages someone that isn't slated to be lynched by the majority, it's an instant lynch the next melee phase. No questions asked. Dealing damage independent of consensus is scummy enough to become a policy kill in this setup.
Id like this to happen here. No townies should attack someone if there is no consensus. This is a place where I bet scum would like to steal some pesky hps. If you want your lovely target to die, then make a case. Solid cases get lynches. True story.
Page 4.
Col is also ok in his answers. Tony not so much. Meh about farside, since at this point agreeing and supporting the plan is a null tell.
kirbyyohsi wrote:Unvote, Vote: TonyMontana for not answering all the questions. There were 7 questions asked, and you only answered 1. Explain.
Me no likes people exaggerating cases. Also, me no likes people following blindly what Kast says.
Page 5
I agree with Yos2. Grover is also meh.
Kast wrote:Conclusion
We should vote. People who voted for the majority candidate should attack that candidate during Melee Phase. Players are requested to not attack anyone other than the majority candidate; those who do will probably not face punishment. Players are requested to post actions in thread. Those who do not will probably not face punishment.
Id really like to ban people who attack other player than the majority candidate. I know you love your little vig powers, but unfortunately we are trying to avoid chaos here. If you want someone dead, then once again, I tell you, MAKE A CASE. If nobody follows your case, then it probable sucks, which would mean you are probably wrong... or that you are prob scum. I really dont want wrong townies here. At the same time, you are giving scum a free pass to behave like a rogue townie.
Now, if you make a case, and the majority follows your case, then success!, you have prob found scum. Or you have found a scummy townie. Which unfortunately needs to die. Like in a real game.
If you are not happy with the choice, then EXPLAIN clearly why you think that player is town.
Heh, Yos stole my case in 117.
Page 6.
Yeah, Yosa2 is town. 126 is pure scumhunting.
Tony is also meh in his posting in this page. Played with him before. Usual logical guy, I would have expected him to dislike rogues. Kast also spotted a contradiction that prob needs explanation.
kirbyyosho wrote:imo, it's probably time to stop arguing about logistics, do it the way majority has agreed upon, and commence scumhunting. Everyone good with that? I just get bogged down talking about how we're going to do everything; let's just do it.
I love how YOU commence to scumhunt.
Page 7.
More farside meh. SnowBunny 155 shines transparency.
Call me Tajo.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12894
Coming summer 2010: Tajo's Starcraft Mafia.
Tajo's MagictheGathering Mafia