Mini 863 - Space Station Mafia: GAME OVER - EVERYONE'S DEAD


User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #450 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:55 pm

Post by Empking »

Messiah;
Empking wrote:
Unvote

Vote; Cooldog


[cut] and Cool is not scumhunting but just... well look at 402. He ignores questions and his main scumhunting is "You weren't voting for two days" which he made when he hadn't voted for at least three days.
My points as can be seen in
the post where I voted him


There's also his refusal to read the thread, acting like he and Hoopla are scumbuddies, his lying, refusing to responbd to the case and only going "Its OMGUS."

Cool:

1) You're scum.

Messiah:

Oh yeah and he keeps on active lurking by merely asking the same question over and over again when he gets an answer.

Cool:
2) Read what I said to Messiah, or any of my other posts where I vote you.
3) Not a question.
4) You're lying again.
User avatar
Sposh
Sposh
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sposh
Goon
Goon
Posts: 136
Joined: September 3, 2009
Location: In The Garage

Post Post #451 (ISO) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:57 am

Post by Sposh »

AlmasterGM wrote:
Sposh wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote:More votes on Sposh, please. His responses to my case are awful.
Care to back this up with facts?
Sure.

Fact #1: Half of your answers are completely non-responsive.
Fact #2: The other half are terrible. They are either a) scumtells in and of themselves, or b) terribad.

Satisfied?
No.
I want it now // I want it now
Give me your heart and your soul

[b]W/L/D: 0/0/0[/b]
User avatar
CooLDoG
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4575
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral

Post Post #452 (ISO) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:48 am

Post by CooLDoG »

CooLDoG wrote:I asked that to him exactly 4 times now, he has yet to give an answer. I ask one more time:

@empking, to no one else just you and only you:
tell me why you are:

A)voting me
B)why am I scummy
C)post your case on me
D)Tell me why you couldn't tell me before

last but not least if you can't answer all of these to full compleation I will vote for you without regrets
Will vote FOS:empking

Now why can't we all play nice a use the form above and post and answer all of them in one post, not two or three but one single post. I know it is taxing of you to post so much but try just this once to answer those four very easy points, thats all you need to do.

~eagerly w8ing for a response~
my post^^^

lets see under point a was very easy, and you got it right!

point B
2) Read what I said to Messiah, or any of my other posts where I vote you.
lets all be clear on those posts now:
empking wrote:I have my vote because somebody is scummy.
I'm voting you because you're scum.
and this:
empking wrote:Messiah probably isn't scum and Cool is not scumhunting but just... well look at 402. He ignores questions and his main scumhunting is "You weren't voting for two days" which he made when he hadn't voted for at least three days.
And that is when you have yet to make a case or scumhunt yourself. And then we have this last one:
empking wrote:No, reasons.
Excerpt from mis quoted post #408 for post # 405 which the ? is
CooLDoG wrote:was your last vote omgus?
Yet it is clear he was responding to that.

So one more time mepking why are you voting me, and as a command or I vote post your case on me in your next post.
after a wank.
User avatar
lobstermania
lobstermania
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
lobstermania
Goon
Goon
Posts: 700
Joined: August 10, 2008
Location: Washington State

Post Post #453 (ISO) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:50 am

Post by lobstermania »

Day Two Vote Count #4
- as of post 452

AlmasterGM (4):
charlatan, Messiah, Sposh, CooLDoG
CooLDoG (1):
Empking
Empking (1):
Hoopla
Hoopla (1):
NewAgeWarrior
Messiah (1):
milkshake
Sposh (1):
AlmasterGM

Not Voting (2):
Coco, Peabody


Reminder: With 11 alive it takes 6 votes to lynch.
Still looking for a CoCo replacement.
User avatar
CooLDoG
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4575
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral

Post Post #454 (ISO) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:50 am

Post by CooLDoG »

ebwop: last line should read: So for the LAST time why are you voting me, and as a command or I WILL vote post your case in your VERY NEXT post.

(caps means words added)
after a wank.
User avatar
charlatan
charlatan
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
charlatan
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: February 24, 2009
Location: tokyo

Post Post #455 (ISO) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:10 am

Post by charlatan »

Sposh wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote:More votes on Sposh, please. His responses to my case are awful.
Care to back this up with facts?
Your responses were, indeed, not good. For instance:
Sposh wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote: 1) hiphop said a lot of things and talked to and about a lot of people. There is one person, however, he avoided talking to and about - Sposh. He only responds Sposh twice, and both posts about extremely trivial matters, almost as if the conversation was forced.
I cannot help what hiphop does. How is that my fault??
This implies that we shouldn't be examining connections between players because one person's actions/attitude towards are "not the fault" of the other, which is silly. Of course we're going to look at who confirmed scum protected, attacked, or ignored.

Your responses to most of his other points along the lines of "hiphop said that, not me" (irrelevant, since Almaster corrected the quotes) or "I'm just asking questions", which is not a defense. If you ask scummy questions, you're scummy.

Another player is also responding poorly to the vote against him:
CooLDoG wrote:ebwop: last line should read: So for the LAST time why are you voting me, and as a command or I WILL vote post your case in your VERY NEXT post.
CooLDoG, what about his posts are you not considering an answer? From where I'm sitting, he seems to have answered your questions, and you seem to just be repeating them again and again, albeit talking like an action hero more and more with each post.
- [color=navy] charlatan[/color]
[color=maroon]every sermon is not the gospel[/color]
[color=navy]more or less done here; will maybe consider invites or replacing into your game if you're in a bind on a case-by-case basis. (low probability.)[/color]
User avatar
AlmasterGM
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4471
Joined: May 29, 2009

Post Post #456 (ISO) » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:37 pm

Post by AlmasterGM »

Sposh wrote: No.
Why don't you just try responding to each of my arguments again. We can proceed from there.
User avatar
CooLDoG
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4575
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral

Post Post #457 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:57 am

Post by CooLDoG »

So I could vote for you for be "just scummy" char? And one point is never good for me. The reason why I don't vote him already is because with me on board agm is at l-2, thus I don't want to let him get of scot free. I would really like a role claim without giving the scum a chance to hammer by going to l-1.
after a wank.
User avatar
charlatan
charlatan
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
charlatan
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: February 24, 2009
Location: tokyo

Post Post #458 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:04 am

Post by charlatan »

CooLDoG wrote:So I could vote for you for be "just scummy" char? And one point is never good for me. The reason why I don't vote him already is because with me on board agm is at l-2, thus I don't want to let him get of scot free. I would really like a role claim without giving the scum a chance to hammer by going to l-1.
He already roleclaimed. He claimed vanilla townie.

Empking is not voting you for "being scummy". He's said the following things about you:

1) Not scumhunting
2) Ignoring questions
3) Not reading the thread
4) Potential scumbuddies with Hoopla
5) Hypocritical vote (saying Empking didn't vote two days when you hadn't voted in three)
6) Refusing to respond to the case and instead writing it off as OMGUS

How do you figure that's not a case? Did you just not read it? And how did you miss that Almaster claimed? Are you even paying attention at all?
- [color=navy] charlatan[/color]
[color=maroon]every sermon is not the gospel[/color]
[color=navy]more or less done here; will maybe consider invites or replacing into your game if you're in a bind on a case-by-case basis. (low probability.)[/color]
User avatar
lobstermania
lobstermania
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
lobstermania
Goon
Goon
Posts: 700
Joined: August 10, 2008
Location: Washington State

Post Post #459 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:02 am

Post by lobstermania »

HowardRoark will replace CoCo starting immediately.
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #460 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:30 pm

Post by Peabody »

Welcome to the game HowardRoark. I'm interested on your take in the game.

I will be forming a case soon enough. Sorry for the lack of posting.
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #461 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:31 pm

Post by Peabody »

btw, that case will be posted on the weekend. Either tomorrow or Sat.
User avatar
AlmasterGM
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4471
Joined: May 29, 2009

Post Post #462 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:23 pm

Post by AlmasterGM »

Peabody wrote:btw, that case will be posted on the weekend. Either tomorrow or Sat.
This is really redundant because we should by lynching Sposh right now, but ok.
User avatar
HowardRoark
HowardRoark
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
HowardRoark
Goon
Goon
Posts: 912
Joined: November 27, 2008
Location: PA, USA

Post Post #463 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by HowardRoark »

I will be reading the thread ASAP.
Help your fellow players by replacing into a game.
User avatar
Sposh
Sposh
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sposh
Goon
Goon
Posts: 136
Joined: September 3, 2009
Location: In The Garage

Post Post #464 (ISO) » Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Post by Sposh »

We shouldn't be lynching me, but I might have to replace out of this game, I'm already in two other ones and I didn't know how demanding it'd be with this game and my new work schedule! 35 hours a week, plus 18 hours of class. It kinda kills me =(
I want it now // I want it now
Give me your heart and your soul

[b]W/L/D: 0/0/0[/b]
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #465 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:21 am

Post by Empking »

Al: Give us two responses from Sposh to your case and tell us why they're scummy.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
User avatar
CooLDoG
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4575
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral

Post Post #466 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:35 am

Post by CooLDoG »

Thanks char, for giving me an answer.

Welcome Howard...

we are at l-2 on agm lets now start to consintrate on him, force a claim, get a case on him, etc. I almost want a l-1 to force a claim but then a scum might come in and hammer.
after a wank.
User avatar
Hoopla
Hoopla
User avatar
User avatar
Hoopla
Posts: 10788
Joined: October 12, 2008

Post Post #467 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:42 am

Post by Hoopla »

CooLDoG wrote:Thanks char, for giving me an answer.

Welcome Howard...

we are at l-2 on agm lets now start to consintrate on him, force a claim, get a case on him, etc. I almost want a l-1 to force a claim but then a scum might come in and hammer.
No. NEVER FORCE CLAIMS when you don't need to. And especially when there aren't 7 people willing to have him lynched. Seriously, there is NO reason to want claims when the wagon doesn't have the support.

As far as AGM goes, he feels the same way as the town games I've seen. I don't understand the case against him.

MORE Empking votes please.
User avatar
Sposh
Sposh
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sposh
Goon
Goon
Posts: 136
Joined: September 3, 2009
Location: In The Garage

Post Post #468 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:03 am

Post by Sposh »

Why do you want Empking votes, Hoopla?
I want it now // I want it now
Give me your heart and your soul

[b]W/L/D: 0/0/0[/b]
User avatar
CooLDoG
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CooLDoG
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4575
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral

Post Post #469 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:42 am

Post by CooLDoG »

I don't like the meta on AGM ether but I want press, and they already forced a claim out of him. One thing: on the whole empking-agm deal is this

once I got him to L-1 he jumped off and voted me with a bad case, thus putting AGM at l-2 and not letting a town come in and hammer. This gets me because if both AGM and EMPking were scum they would do the exact same thing as I just descriped. If AGM was indeed town then why the hell would empking pull off a l-1 lynch?

I don't like the vibes I get from AGM or from Empking. I am just not sure, but I do know that I would prefer a Empking lynch over an AGM. But I don't want to take off the press and end up looking bad if empking turns town...

But I think that I want at the moment to:
unvote AGm, revote Empking
the meta on AGM didn't look good ether.
after a wank.
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #470 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:47 am

Post by Empking »

Cool, I have voted AGM at all this day.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #471 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:48 am

Post by Empking »

EBWOP


Cool, I have
n't
voted AGM at all this day.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
User avatar
AlmasterGM
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4471
Joined: May 29, 2009

Post Post #472 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:37 am

Post by AlmasterGM »

CooLDoG wrote:I don't like the meta on AGM ether but I want press, and they already forced a claim out of him. One thing: on the whole empking-agm deal is this

once I got him to L-1 he jumped off and voted me with a bad case, thus putting AGM at l-2 and not letting a town come in and hammer. This gets me because if both AGM and EMPking were scum they would do the exact same thing as I just descriped. If AGM was indeed town then why the hell would empking pull off a l-1 lynch?

I don't like the vibes I get from AGM or from Empking. I am just not sure, but I do know that I would prefer a Empking lynch over an AGM. But I don't want to take off the press and end up looking bad if empking turns town...

But I think that I want at the moment to:
unvote AGm, revote Empking
the meta on AGM didn't look good ether.
WTF? Are we even playing the same game? You don't seem to know what is going on AT ALL, both in terms of strategy and physical who-is-doing-what.

I'd be down with either a Cooldog or Sposh lynch at this point.
User avatar
charlatan
charlatan
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
charlatan
Goon
Goon
Posts: 621
Joined: February 24, 2009
Location: tokyo

Post Post #473 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:01 am

Post by charlatan »

Once again CooLDoG somehow forgets we already saw Almaster claim.

Hoopla's insistence that CooLDoG not push for an Almaster claim means we can add her to the list of people probably not paying attention to the game.
- [color=navy] charlatan[/color]
[color=maroon]every sermon is not the gospel[/color]
[color=navy]more or less done here; will maybe consider invites or replacing into your game if you're in a bind on a case-by-case basis. (low probability.)[/color]
User avatar
Hoopla
Hoopla
User avatar
User avatar
Hoopla
Posts: 10788
Joined: October 12, 2008

Post Post #474 (ISO) » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:25 am

Post by Hoopla »

charlatan wrote:Once again CooLDoG somehow forgets we already saw Almaster claim.

Hoopla's insistence that CooLDoG not push for an Almaster claim means we can add her to the list of people probably not paying attention to the game.
Eh, sorry. I have been reading, but I have been more focused on my other game to be honest. I missed his claim.

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”