Sposh wrote:AlmasterGM wrote:More votes on Sposh, please. His responses to my case are awful.
Care to back this up with facts?
Your responses were, indeed, not good. For instance:
Sposh wrote:
AlmasterGM wrote:
1) hiphop said a lot of things and talked to and about a lot of people. There is one person, however, he avoided talking to and about - Sposh. He only responds Sposh twice, and both posts about extremely trivial matters, almost as if the conversation was forced.
I cannot help what hiphop does. How is that my fault??
This implies that we shouldn't be examining connections between players because one person's actions/attitude towards are "not the fault" of the other, which is silly. Of course we're going to look at who confirmed scum protected, attacked, or ignored.
Your responses to most of his other points along the lines of "hiphop said that, not me" (irrelevant, since Almaster corrected the quotes) or "I'm just asking questions", which is not a defense. If you ask scummy questions, you're scummy.
Another player is also responding poorly to the vote against him:
CooLDoG wrote:ebwop: last line should read: So for the LAST time why are you voting me, and as a command or I WILL vote post your case in your VERY NEXT post.
CooLDoG, what about his posts are you not considering an answer? From where I'm sitting, he seems to have answered your questions, and you seem to just be repeating them again and again, albeit talking like an action hero more and more with each post.