@Porkens-
How is that not "IFF Porkens is town AND Sigma is town, THEN It is probable that scum want to get aboard a town ship. IF It is probable that scum want to get aboard a town ship, THEN Town should not rescue .?"
I assumed this was clear, looks like that was a mistaken assumption on my part.
"IFF A AND B, THEN C" is different from "IF A AND B, THEN C". IFF would mean that "IF NOT A OR NOT B, THEN NOT C" which is false. C can be true without both A and B being true. From a townie PoV, each player who makes a claim suggesting that C is true makes it more probable that C is in fact true.
A townie should not know what situation we are in. {A&B, !A&B, A&!B, !A&!B} However, all situations argue for D or suggest that we are in C, which reduces to D due to uncertainty.
IF a player strongly believes A, THEN it is better to rescue A. Same for B. This is and has been what I posted from the beginning, despite Porkens trying to twist things out of context and remove that part.
I didn't spell out that I'm not the doc. You are inventing that in your own head. Opening up the subject of "doc" is an invitation to talk about the subject. Case in point: if you'd never brought up the doc here, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Don't make implications like that. YOU made the implication without realizing how much of a terrible play it was. The ONLY reason it was brought up is because YOU decided to make such a terrible play. Please stop. If you continue, I will continue to tell you to stop.
This isn't an
interpretation
, it is a direct implication of your post. Don't make a post like that. When someone points out the problem with it, don't defend that terrible play by throwing around an inapplicable term.
I honestly thought this was a full-claim of your ability. If it isn't, fine. Keep the rest to yourself, I honestly don't care. The fact that you targeted someone and that they confirm this are meaningless, anyway.
This is inconsistent with your previous objection.
You said "I'm not going to give out info about my role." Then you said "I can do X, Y, and Z and I'm Pkunk" no?
Your previous objection was that Kast claimed he would not give information but then gave information. Regardless of whether you thought I gave a full claim or you realized I gave a partial claim, your insistence that I said I would not give out role information was false.
-Suggestion: Instead of feeling bad, fix your behavior.
@KMD-
(I'd do this even as doc just to confuse scum)
By posting this, you are admitting that Porkens post
IS
claiming that he is not doc. He may have been intending to confuse scum. Again, I asked him to STOP COMMENTING on it. Instead he keeps bringing it up and claiming there is nothing wrong.
It is possible to comment on a night kill or lack of night kill without claiming that you yourself are not responsible. Porken's CHOSE to do so which is EXTREMELY anti-town.
@Rising/Sigma/Why townies claiming they have ships that scum would like to get on implies that scum would like to get on those ships-
Again, I thought this was obvious, but looks like I was mistaken. And to be clear, Porkens claimed that scum would want to board his ship and that he was destroying the ship because he did not want to let that happen.
If a townie genuinely has a powerful scum ship that isn't a normal part of SC2 game mechanics and/or flavor, that implies that the mod has a reason for including that, either as an in game mechanic or as a red herring.
For a game as complex as this one, with an already known mechanic for transferring players between ships, game setup information that implies scum want to get on board a townie ship makes it more probable that scum want to get on board a townie ship.
@Dry-fit/Zito/Red Ship-
-Is it plausible that Dry-fit's claim would be a townie?
-I agree that it is unlikely that Dry-Fit or RC don't have red ships. I think it is very probable that lynching a player out of the known red ship group is more likely to hit scum than picking a random player.
-Based on the timing of Dry-Fit's claim, I'd guess that he is claiming miller to forestall a suspected investigation tonight.
-I am surprised that Dry-Fit answered my question directly. Could be a slip or honesty.
I am fine with lynching either Dry-Fit or RC today.
Unvote, Vote: Dry-Fit
Seriously, any additional thoughts on just about anything else would be helpful.
