Anyway, I'll accept that you will never explain this to me if it is really putting you out that much.
Yes, let's go ahead and look at post 207Starbuck wrote:You went after me because I was reading the other games, just like almost everyone else did, to try and stay caught up with theirs and ours. You also assumed that I was making our game a lower priority than the others via post 207.
I don't like how instead of answering a legitimate question or at least clarifying my 'misunderstanding' you lashed out at me. So let's just make this easy, why don't you quote one of your posts day one before the hammer in which you were contributing to this game. That way we can see just how wrong I was to ask you such a dumb question! (I'm talking scumhunting, or even opinions)Head_Honcho wrote:Who is that directed at?Starbuck wrote:I didn't go through all of Day 1 without saying anything. I was reading the other games to try and see where they were at, just like everyone else did, before posting in ours.
That's quite an accusation to make also when your first real post wasn't until yesterday.
Why would you make this game a lower priority than the others?
See, this is actually strawmanning. I never went from one extreme to the other. If anything my position on the subject became much more moderate, but I actually see the first part and the third part as the same thing, except in the third one you quoted I explained what I meant by explicit crossover.Starbuck wrote:I do not like that you want to disregard anything going on in the other games.
And in one post (114), you go from the opinion of not wanting to pay attention to the other gamesHead_Honcho wrote:I'm going to go ahead and completely disregard the other subgames until there is some explicit crossover.
to not wanting to ignore them completely.Head_Honcho wrote:Anything that distracts unduly from the people in this specific game is not a good idea, and I think focusing a bunch of attention and posts on the other games falls under that.
I don't like how you go from one extreme to the other in the very same post.Head_Honcho wrote:I don't think the other games should be ignored entirely, for instance I think once we have night flavor/actions it could be helpful to compare them to the other games to try to get a feel for setup, but as far as picking lynches I think it would do us well to keep the majority of analysis directed at people we can actually affect with votes.
This is not ad hominem at all, ad hominem is attacking the debater instead of the argument. Your argument seemed to begin and end with 'omg strawman' so I don't think it was unfair of me to ask for clarification.Starbuck wrote:I also do not like your ad hom attacks, like this:
Head_Honcho wrote:It's apparently your word of the day so I'm curious where it actually applies to me.
I haven't played with Zwet. That doesn't clear things up at all! Why would someone be more likely to be a townie if they were playing different than they normally do?Starbuck wrote:I'm guessing that you haven't really played with Zwet. He definitely has a playstyle all his own. I have played quite a few games with him since joining this site, and I normally have a very difficult time reading him. This game though he was just acting very different from other games that we have played, and anyone else who has played with zwet extensively probably saw what I saw.
It was all about the scum though, please show me (with a specific post of whoot's) where his speculation showed any intention or possibility of outing town power roles. Just talking about magic is not enough, plenty of people were talking about magic.Starbuck wrote:Did you happen to forget that this game is based on Magic: the Gathering? So Whoot "yammering on" about magic cards is definite speculation in my opinion.
And then since you voted me I suppose I am entitled to ask, why do any of those things make me look scummy to you?