Also,
No...really?Y.C wrote:In conclusion, since she is not a jester, she is either mafia, which should be lynched, or third party/Townie
No...really?Y.C wrote:In conclusion, since she is not a jester, she is either mafia, which should be lynched, or third party/Townie
This is the first time I have done a survey like this.Y.C. 49 wrote:From this I infer that it is a regular tactic of her, and not a means of drawing animosity towards herself, which is the automatic result as I see it,
Once again, let's count the anti-Town statements here.Y.C. 49 wrote:In conclusion, since she is not a jester, she is either mafia, which should be lynched, or third party/Townie, in which case I am ready to lynch her by the principle stated in my previous post.
Cut by DeathRowKitty: ...basically that, but I don't want to throw this post away now that I've finished itY.C. 49 wrote:Also, my words about sacrificing a townsperson are meant as indication of intent, a principle, as stated in the same paragraph Vi quoted. It does not mean I view her as a Townsperson.
Is this seriously part of your argument to discredit me?Y.C. 54 wrote:P.S: Vi, if in the other game the survey was adele's, my point still stands. You did not invent this method simply to irritate others, you copied someone else's technique, a technique I find highly flawed and rude.
No real suspect at the moment, since I'm quite limited on time to analyze everything right now, but for now those are going to be people who I'll ask below:Vi wrote:Col. Cathart's answers strike me as coming from an experienced perspective, which makes sense given he's played offsite. However, the answers are fully open, which I approve of. I would like to know who he thinks is scum at this point.
I'm pretty sure the survey is only tangential to the accusations being levied against you. I barely mentioned once that you didn't take it.Y.C. 59 wrote:However, since the survey centered all discussion around itself,
I don't entirely agree, but having J.D, imaginality, Col. Cathart, and afatchic show up would be nice.jammer 66 wrote:I can not see why not give him the time. It can not hurt town, only help.
Vi wrote:I was in a game with Cruciare for all of four pages at the beginning of the year.
You know, I was going to scold Vi for giving players an excuse to fill their posts answering some questionnaire instead of voting each other, but this post was A+++ comedy gold, bro. And I mean that in the sense that I'm laughingY.C wrote:Yes, since the survey has derailed this whole game into an obsessive discussion about it, shifting attention from anything else.
We cannot know about Vi's alignment, since evryone's attention is directed towards the aftermath of the survey.
In effect, this caused a general tormoil which is very harmful to the game in general, and the town in particular,by allowing the mafia and 3rd parties to stay relatively under the radar.
Since this effect is so extreme, I believe that such an action should be sanctioned by the most effective tool we have at our disposal: the lynch.
By lynching the survey initiator, we make a point about the validness of such actions in future games and are able to abandon this line in the present one.
The only other option I see is an appeal to the mod for the removal of Vi from the game. This will serve a similar purpose, but in my opinion he will not consent to this.
RedCoyote, if you consider this survey business enough grounds for removal from the game, please post a reply to the same effect.
P.S: Vi, if in the other game the survey was adele's, my point still stands. You did not invent this method simply to irritate others, you copied someone else's technique, a technique I find highly flawed and rude.
Also, Your alignment is no longer the issue. The only way to get out of the survey entanglement is to end it right here, either by a lynch or a stop to this line of discussion, which will not happen willingly, nor can it, under the circumstances.
Such a turn of events was predicted by Porkens in the passage I quoted.