Could you please give details on this? Also, are you saying that they might be scum together?moose200x wrote:My Milked Eek wrote:Good, your vote tells us 2 things:DarkLightA wrote:I have to say that I get suspicious of My Milked Eek due to his "interesting" vote..
Vote: My Milked Eek
1) your vote isn't random
2) something is off with my vote according to you
If you could elaborate on the second thing please.
Obviously.moose wrote:Is this some sort of scum tactic?
No, seriously, it is easier for us to tie posts to a person with visual material, such as avatars. It also adds more character to you as a poster/player, imo.I disagree on every count.
Newbie 830: Game Over
-
-
Jed Cooper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 313
- Joined: August 11, 2009
When youQuote CliphangNUKEa man, you'd better look at 'em!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
AfroLaX Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 41
- Joined: August 16, 2009
- Location: Cape Town, South Africa
-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
My idea was that My Milked Eek voted for a pointless reason (the avatar). Now, you are the only one supporting him.. Now,Jed Cooper wrote:
Sounds scum-aware to me.DarkLightA wrote:I have to say that I get suspicious of My Milked Eek due to his "interesting" vote..
Vote: My Milked Eek
Get the discussion going, and.my vote is open for change
Vote Darkthatseems scum-like to me.-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
People! Be sensible!
Notice how My Milked Eek commented on my vote, and then Jed Cooper comes in and agrees with Eek, and asked me to explain my vote, which I already had done in my post.
Now Eek asks for avatars, and moose comments on this. Then guess who comes in to support Eek?
@AfroLaX, please read Eek's vote:
Vote: almaster
There's only one who can have a Pokémon-related avatar.-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
You didn't really answer our questions, but let's start with what we have:
You see, it was a pointless reason. I got that, almaster got that and now you admit to getting that as well. If you acknowledge it was a pointless reason, why did you think of it as suspicious?darklight #028 wrote:My idea was that My Milked Eek voted for a pointless reason (the avatar).
Relax, my friend, the game is young and the wine is still plenty.DarkLightA wrote:People! Be sensible!
Notice how My Milked Eek commented on my vote, and then Jed Cooper comes in and agrees with Eek, and asked me to explain my vote, which I already had done in my post.
Now Eek asks for avatars, and moose comments on this. Then guess who comes in to support Eek?
1) What was so suspicious of my vote that made you vote for me?
2) Would you say that Jed agreeing with me is a sign that he is a scum trying to buddy up to me or is it a sign of him trying to scumhunt?
3) What do you think about moose's comment?
4) Same as #2, does jed appear to be buddying or hunting scum to you?Eek!-
-
Jed Cooper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 313
- Joined: August 11, 2009
DarkLightA wrote:
My idea was that My Milked Eek voted for a pointless reason (the avatar). Now, you are the only one supporting him.. Now,Jed Cooper wrote:
Sounds scum-aware to me.DarkLightA wrote:I have to say that I get suspicious of My Milked Eek due to his "interesting" vote..
Vote: My Milked Eek
Get the discussion going, and.my vote is open for change
Vote Darkthatseems scum-like to me.
No. MY question is why is Milk defending you here. Are you two scum buddies?Jed Cooper wrote:Could you please give details on this? Also, are you saying that they might be scum together? (milk)When youQuote CliphangNUKEa man, you'd better look at 'em!-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
Official Vote Count (deadline 9/9)
DarkLightA (2): (Jed Cooper, AfroLaX)
Maemuki (1): (moose200x)
AlmasterGM (1): (My Milked Eek)
moose200x (1): (Maemuki)
Jed Cooper (1): (DarkLightA)
My Milked Eek (1): (AlmasterGM)
Verll (0):
Belili (0):
AfroLaX (0):
Not Voting (2): (Verll, Belili)
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch. Please let me know if there are any errors with this vote count.Last edited by Thok on Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:20 am, edited 2 times in total.I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.-
-
Jed Cooper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 313
- Joined: August 11, 2009
I'm just questioning the "easy treatment" you are giving Dark in a "coaching him through it" kind of way.My Milked Eek wrote:
Who am I defending where exactly again?Jed wrote:No. MY question is why is Milk defending you here. Are you two scum buddies?
Then Moose said he disagreed with your points on all counts and the idea came to me that maybe you both were scum?When youQuote CliphangNUKEa man, you'd better look at 'em!-
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
I have been suspicious of both Eek and Jed, and now I'm counter-voting Jed because he voted for meMaemuki wrote:
Simple and plain OMGUS, and one without reason, care to explain?DarkLightA wrote:Unvote: My Milked Eek
Vote: Jed Cooper
Just seems logical to me to counter-vote Jed.
This should be pretty clear if you were to read my previous posts.-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
-
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
I want to make sure that dark understands what he's saying, it appears to me he isn't really aware of the gravity of his vote for me and his following posts. Don't think that I'm not suspicious of his behaviour right now. I just don't see it fitting to vote him just yet.Jed Cooper wrote:
I'm just questioning the "easy treatment" you are giving Dark in a "coaching him through it" kind of way.My Milked Eek wrote:
Who am I defending where exactly again?Jed wrote:No. MY question is why is Milk defending you here. Are you two scum buddies?
I don't really see the line that connects point A to point B really.jed wrote:Then Moose said he disagreed with your points on all counts and the idea came to me that maybe you both were scum?
1) You didn't really explain why I'm suspicious. And before you're going to reference that one post you made, let me tell you that that is not a good enough reason.dark wrote:I have been suspicious of both Eek and Jed, and now I'm counter-voting Jed because he voted for me
This should be pretty clear if you were to read my previous posts.
2) Are you suspicious of Jed only because he is suspicious of you?
3) Why are you ignoring my questions?
OMGUS:
Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me).
In essence it's a retaliatory vote, in other words you vote a person only because they voted for you. And usually that's the only reason to vote.
Do note that not all cross voting is omgus.Eek!-
-
Jed Cooper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 313
- Joined: August 11, 2009
Ok. Point well taken.My Milked Eek wrote:I want to make sure that dark understands what he's saying, it appears to me he isn't really aware of the gravity of his vote for me and his following posts. Don't think that I'm not suspicious of his behaviour right now. I just don't see it fitting to vote him just yet.When youQuote CliphangNUKEa man, you'd better look at 'em!-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
1) It started when you posted that awkward "I'm the only one who can have a Pokemon avatar" post.My Milked Eek wrote:1) You didn't really explain why I'm suspicious. And before you're going to reference that one post you made, let me tell you that that is not a good enough reason.
2) Are you suspicious of Jed only because he is suspicious of you?
3) Why are you ignoring my questions?
2) No, because he backs up everything you say.
3) I answer them if I want to answer them.-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
1) You do realize that games usually start with a "random voting stage" (abbr. rvs), in which players "random vote" other players to get some discussion started. This isn't always necessary and some games start without them. Some players even refuse to random vote.DarkLightA wrote:1) It started when you posted that awkward "I'm the only one who can have a Pokemon avatar" post.
2) No, because he backs up everything you say.
3) I answer them if I want to answer them.
You see, there was no actual reason behind my vote, other than having a vote placed somewhere. The reason I picked almaster was randomly picked.
Now, if someone were to say "I find player x suspicious" in their first post, people usually expect some explanation.
2) Does that make him suspicious? Me? Or you, the subject of our shared suspicion?
3) Sure, but you do realize that not answering questions makes you look evasive, which in turn does not aid your case.
Now, if you will go back and answer all of my questions.Unvote.Eek!-
-
Verll Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 17
- Joined: August 2, 2009
-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
DarkLightA Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: August 14, 2009
- Location: Norway
1) I think that's answered.My Milked Eek wrote:1) What was so suspicious of my vote that made you vote for me?
2) Would you say that Jed agreeing with me is a sign that he is a scum trying to buddy up to me or is it a sign of him trying to scumhunt?
3) What do you think about moose's comment?
4) Same as #2, does jed appear to be buddying or hunting scum to you?
2&4) Already answered.
3) Awkward, but not really that suspicious (how would it make him scum to not want avatars??).
My Milked Eek wrote:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: 43
DarkLightA wrote:
1) It started when you posted that awkward "I'm the only one who can have a Pokemon avatar" post.
2) No, because he backs up everything you say.
3) I answer them if I want to answer them.
1) You do realize that games usually start with a "random voting stage" (abbr. rvs), in which players "random vote" other players to get some discussion started. This isn't always necessary and some games start without them. Some players even refuse to random vote.
You see, there was no actual reason behind my vote, other than having a vote placed somewhere. The reason I picked almaster was randomly picked.
Now, if someone were to say "I find player x suspicious" in their first post, people usually expect some explanation.
2) Does that make him suspicious? Me? Or you, the subject of our shared suspicion?
3) Sure, but you do realize that not answering questions makes you look evasive, which in turn does not aid your case.
Ok, I get it..UNVOTE-
-
AfroLaX Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 41
- Joined: August 16, 2009
- Location: Cape Town, South Africa
I asked you "What is suspicious about his vote?", because a vote based on something arbitrary [ie. pokemon avatars] often happens on D1, you then quoted his "interesting" vote assuming I would automatically see why it was suspicious without proper reasoning. It seems to me like you were possibly trying to get a bandwagon going on someone based on a false claim.
Also, Dark seems to have gotten really jumpy and done a lot of talking since a couple of votes went against him. A lot of the things he has been saying seem to implicate him [ie. "3) I answer them if I want to answer them."]. However, they could all just be signs of noobness, in which case he is innocent & just attracting attention because he doesn't know what he is doing.
Sure, it makes it seem more likely that Jed is innocent because he is aggressively attacking people a lot, but he could just be doing that to preempt negative attention. By stating your points 2 & 4, you're in effect buddying him.My Milked Eek wrote:4) Same as #2, does jed appear to be buddying or hunting scum to you?
My vote still stands against Dark though.Get off the bandwagon and put down the handbook!-
-
Jed Cooper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 313
- Joined: August 11, 2009
@Mae:What is your opinion of Dark with all of his posts now taken into consideration?When youQuote CliphangNUKEa man, you'd better look at 'em!-
-
AlmasterGM Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4471
- Joined: May 29, 2009
It's dangerous for IC's to blast out guns blazing early - because they are known be experienced, their suspicions can rapidly turn into a bandwagon if care is not taken. My Milked Eek may simply be playing lightly in order to prevent this from happening.Jed Cooper wrote:'m just questioning the "easy treatment" you are giving Dark in a "coaching him through it" kind of way.
To be fair, it wasn't really awkward to anyone but you.DarkLightA wrote:1) It started when you posted that awkward "I'm the only one who can have a Pokemon avatar" post.
Unvote: My Milked Eeek. Vote: Belili.He isn't saying anything. This needs to change.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.