/in-vitational 2 - Chosen, Karaoke - Game over! before 830

MiteyMouse · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:39 am

hohum wrote:
Unvote, Vote MiteyMouse

Hmmm...did I catch you in a contradiction and now you're OMGUSing me? Didn't you already accuse Sajin of doing that? I'm kind of happy that I did not remove my random vote now...

hohum · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:43 am

Wrong.

You obviously don't understand the difference between arguing about a case and answering a simple question. The question I asked was designed to gauge whether or not you're actually paying attention. You clearly aren't

We're 10 pages into D1 and you obviously don't have an opinion. I'm not going to allow you to lay back and do nothing.

MiteyMouse · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:45 am

hohum wrote:I want you to stop being dodgy and answer the question, because based on post 204 I don't believe you bother to actually think about what you post before you post it. Which is a scum tell. Trying to appear to be helpful and actually being helpful are two different things.

Your refusal to comply is negatively effecting my null read on you.

Are you kidding? When you are Scum, do you really not think twice before everything you post and then look over it for possible slips? I do.

Your refusal to agree to my agreement and then blaming it on me is not making you look good in my eyes either my friend!

MiteyMouse · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:52 am

hohum wrote:Wrong.

You obviously don't understand the difference between arguing about a case and answering a simple question. The question I asked was designed to gauge whether or not you're actually paying attention. You clearly aren't

We're 10 pages into D1 and you obviously don't have an opinion. I'm not going to allow you to lay back and do nothing.

I have oponions and have stated them and then you say that I'm not paying attention...very interesting.

I think Hohum's trying to play poke the Mouse here...hehehe

My agreement with you was to see if you are willing to work as a Team...and you clearly aren't.

Sajin · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:10 am

Hohum- What is the definition of strongarming? Thanks.

hohum · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:18 am

strong-arm (strôngärm) Informal
adj.
Using physical force or coercion: strong-arm tactics.
tr.v. strong-armed, strong-arm·ing, strong-arms
1. To use physical force or coercion against.
2. To rob by force.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/strong-arming

I can't force anyone to do anything. I can only use my vote as pressure.

What's the purpose of that question?

hohum · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:21 am

Sajin: You should look up the definition of straw man and stop tilting at the windmills.

Sajin · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:24 am

Strong-arm tactics involve taking a certain point of view or stance (In this case- your belief I am scum) and then attacking all the people that do not agree with your viewpoint in an effort to coerce them to your point of view.

Do you agree this is what your doing?

hohum · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:14 am

Sajin wrote:Strong-arm tactics involve taking a certain point of view or stance (In this case- your belief I am scum) and then attacking all the people that do not agree with your viewpoint in an effort to coerce them to your point of view.

Do you agree this is what your doing?

Not agreeing with me is one thing. Actively defending you is another. I'm attacking those (rightfully) who take the viewpoint that I am scum because I think you are scum. Those who line up against me SHOULD be suspect.

hohum · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:15 am

Sajin Quixote: stop trying to distort my position.

Sajin · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:58 am

Answer the question directly then.

hohum · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:02 pm

I did!

Post 233. I clearly disagree with your assessment.

Sajin · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:07 pm

No, you agree your strong arming and then premptively say its not scummy.

MiteyMouse · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:08 pm

hohum wrote:
Sajin wrote:Strong-arm tactics involve taking a certain point of view or stance (In this case- your belief I am scum) and then attacking all the people that do not agree with your viewpoint in an effort to coerce them to your point of view.

Do you agree this is what your doing?
Not agreeing with me is one thing. Actively defending you is another. I'm attacking those (rightfully) who take the viewpoint that I am scum because I think you are scum. Those who line up against me SHOULD be suspect.

I wasn't defending him....

hohum · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:23 pm

MiteyMouse wrote:
hohum wrote:
Sajin wrote:Strong-arm tactics involve taking a certain point of view or stance (In this case- your belief I am scum) and then attacking all the people that do not agree with your viewpoint in an effort to coerce them to your point of view.

Do you agree this is what your doing?
Not agreeing with me is one thing. Actively defending you is another. I'm attacking those (rightfully) who take the viewpoint that I am scum because I think you are scum. Those who line up against me SHOULD be suspect.
I wasn't defending him....

And why do you think he's referring to you at all? I'm attacking you for a different reason.

Sajin · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:41 pm

hohum wrote:
MiteyMouse wrote:
hohum wrote:
Sajin wrote:Strong-arm tactics involve taking a certain point of view or stance (In this case- your belief I am scum) and then attacking all the people that do not agree with your viewpoint in an effort to coerce them to your point of view.

Do you agree this is what your doing?
Not agreeing with me is one thing. Actively defending you is another. I'm attacking those (rightfully) who take the viewpoint that I am scum because I think you are scum. Those who line up against me SHOULD be suspect.
I wasn't defending him....
And why do you think he's referring to you at all? I'm attacking you for a different reason.

When did I refer to ANYONE defending? That was all you sir.

hohum · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:43 pm

jesus christ sajin, learn to read. I never implied that you referred to anyone defending.

Papa Zito · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:47 pm

Holy hell. hohum, you're drowning the game.

hohum · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:48 pm

I'm going to hop back on my original suspicions, because you've been nothing but argumentative for the last 2 pages and you take virtually everything I say out of context. You're clearly doing it on purpose. You're trying too hard.

Unvote, Vote Sajin

I'm happy with a sajin lynch for today.

hohum · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:49 pm

Papa Zito wrote:Holy hell. hohum, you're drowning the game.

I can't help it here everyone would rather argue with me than talk to me.

Sajin · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:50 pm

Following all the points you made in the above quote pyramid would mean your implying he was defending me. Feel free to correct that, instead of making vague statements of what you did NOT do. Tell me what you DID do.

Swearing does not make your arguments any more convincing, a tip for your text game as scum.

Regardless, Hohum: Given the setup do you agree scum have a strong motivation to strong-arm (no pun intended...maybe)?

MiteyMouse · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:50 pm

MiteyMouse is a she!

hohum · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:52 pm

sajin is so obvscum it hurts.

Sajin · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:57 pm

hohum wrote:sajin is so obvscum it hurts.

I am still waiting on your case. Or even a supporting point.

MiteyMouse · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:22 pm

Sorry Hohum...Sajin wasn't referring to me but, he did bring up the strong arming. You are using strong arm tactics with several of us in this game...me being one and that is what I was commenting on.