And even though I am still processing the thought, and am not sure yet how much the assumptions are likely, that explanation seems like a very thought out answer.Qwints wrote:[Reasoning provided]
Hmm. Something to think about. Thank you for your response.
Hah.Qwints wrote:Hohum's defense of me is quite strange. Cuddly hohum freaks me out.
Meh, fair I suppose. But that does not change the fact that anti-town play can be scummy, and I should examine it. And if necessary believe its scummy in absence of a defense I can believe.Qwints wrote:[...] anti-town may overlap scummy, but it does not equal scummy.
No, you are right, I didn't. Why not? I made an assumption. My assumption being that he either wanted claimed views from people for the information it contained, or he wanted to look like he wanted the information.Qwints wrote:Did you ask the troll to explain the reasoning behind his questions at the beginning of the game. If not, why not?
Long story short, I believed it was just a way to start the game.
Besides that, even though I can not read his motives for asking questions, point blank asking him additional questions at that time would have been near useless at that point. He would have just tried to answer in a way that would have made sense and would have likely succeeded no matter what alignment he is. There was nothing overtly illogical that I noticed that I could have tried to examine, if there was I would have tried to examine it...
Heh. Fail bait is fail.Hohum wrote:It would be hard for scum to stand their ground when the likes of PZ, Scien and Nikanor are all playing this game like children who have just been told to go to bed early.