I'm up to #502. Same as before: if you feel the need to answer, do so, if not, don't. If stuff has been answered/or cleared up after #502, ignore the question/note. Final stretch coming tomorrow.
Continuing from before:
>> reckonvig
C_o: "Could you clarify what's townie play in your opinion?"
(#258)
I'm not sure what to make out of this. It's dodgy.
This arc then dies, with only one heavy opponent in the end; qax as shown by his
301.
>> wicked
I can fully agree with reckoner in his
330 when he brings up wicked's contradictions and his distancing of reckoner.
lol, especially after the lurker comment above it. It could be coincidence, but it looks to me like it'd be too much of a coincidence that he posts 1 hour after being called out on lurking.
"@xRx - Do you plan on killing anybody tonight?"
~ wicked (364).
Fishing. Period.
"Now that the bandwagon on him has died, he seems to be deflecting attention away from him."
~ wicked (#368).
>> cocop
I agree
with this. Coco feels like omgussing kitty throughout the thread up until this point.
After being quiet for some pages, coco comes back and
finds a building case on wicked "intriguing". Feels like egging wicked.
"
I honestly don't care what the vig does. The role, if used wisely, helps the town, and I'm VERY pro town.
" ~
coco;
Seriously, could you be more obvious? And
another rather obvious statement by coco. Making such statements is always counterproductive. A few pages later:
yet another one.
Coco then makes a few interesting statements about
lobsters suspiciousness.
A feeble attempt at finding something to use against wicked as wicked's vote is justified.
The
I need 36 hours to post post is crap and, imo, you're trying to find enough material that might pass as evidence for a statment you made a while ago to shake off suspicion.
gft
I'm not sure if it has been brought up yet, but:
"
I've played Mafia on a few other non-mafia based forums. I'd rather not name those forums to protect my anonymity.
" ~
#502 Coco
But didn't you say you had little forum experience?
>> wolf
This post by kitty implies a certain urge or need to push the wolfram slot and comes over as trying not to appeear to pushy by asking how to handle replacements.
Another kitty replacement post.
>> statistics 101
nht, drk, wicked: what did you hope to achieve with the little math/stats posting? Let me be very suggestive: to appear protown by using theory discussion?
>> other oddities and general things
I don't like nht
post about qax being v/la. It's blatantly stupid.
kitty wrote:@MME
Do you still feel the need to keep a vote on Reckoner?
Of course not, but I hadn't been on in quite some time. Also, does it matter that much if he's at 1 vote or at 0 if the only vote he has is because of laziness/unableness to unvote? He's not being suspected or wasn't close to being hammered, so I wonder why you felt you needed to bring this up.
At this point I'm going to have to out my suspicions in the general wicked-coco direction. More towards coco than wicked if needed to make a choice.