she fell asleep
there is a lot of activity in this one. goddamn.
raskol
clarify the post below please. what is spamming the thread with "goatse"??
raskol 233 wrote:Player B claims scum and spams the thread with goatse (we'll assume that goatse-spamming is a nulltell which an troll townie or troll scum would be equally likely to do, but is super anti-town because it makes people want to avoid looking at the thread).
A) i dont think because sydeneys performance in game has been consistent doesnt mean hes any less suspicious for what hes doing, given his specific moves. but you do say its just his meta (although i havent checked this yet, i will though before monday) and so considering this, sydeney has gone down in suspicion for me a bit. what hes saying, though, what hes
DOING:
i cant ignore blowing in the wind and poking without explaining, etc.
B) haylens acted suspiciously but i think you have too (not counting the suspicion i had for auditor). what is LESS suspicious about sydeney? i understand the meta thing. but look at the moves hes made this game. and you think haylen is more vote worthy?
C) its suspicious to me that you should choose points like haylens not looking for who replaced who as somesort of illuminating action given the present circumstances. actually pretty damn suspicious. its like your grasping at straws yelling and screaming for the lynch. i understand that its nearing the end and you purportedly think you have a clean shot at haylen but trying to frame not looking at replacements as a sort of tell smells either desperate or blindly zealous. i mean you are being reeeaally aggressive, and focused on this one purpose, it seems. if you could connect the non-look to something else substantial i feel like you may have something worth some attention but as of right now its like youre trying to manufact the appearance of guilt where there is little, especially given how nikanor points out that it was last day in her other thread. you noticed what she was posting but NOT that it was last day?????
actually, this is so suspicious to me that im going to
FOS: raskol
and promise to review the last few pages tomorrow (friday) or sunday. perhaps a change in vote is coming from me, i have to review what you were saying about haylens supposedly fallacious move against you. maybe i agree or youve got something valid there. but if not then ill have to reassess the last couple pages entirely (which, for the record, isnt necessarily for or against you personally)
haylen
A) i feel what youre saying about the auditor-raeil connection but i think thats just one of the downsides to making all your posts poetry like that, hes just saying some of that to flesh it out and make the rhythms work.
B) Sods Law is that you will lose data when your computer goes down?
wierd law....
C) i empathize with your computer problems but i really do feel like your lack of content has been suspicious. its not even that you were posting in other game(s). i cant put my finger on it but....maybe its just that in 11 or so pages the best case youve got so far ends at like page 5 and now basically reads like a conveniently defensive extension
D) still, though i dont think youre super suspicious. life happens and someone who is really aggressive is going after you and that player did just happen to replace into auditors spot (i think)
nikanor 261 wrote:Gasp. A person wants to spend more time posting in a thread in which the deadline is that day!
nice catch, sir
onion 249 wrote:A)Raskol picked the arguments he could win and passed on the ones he didn't think he could. now he's picking up speed against Haylen.
B)Haylen, it is unlikely that lurking is WIFOM because otherwise accepted practices like Lynch-All-Lurkers would not be so popular.
A) what arguments is he passing on?
B) while im not sure exactly what is being said here, it seems like youre (onion) committing the appeal to popularity fallacy. people do dumb things en mass all the time.
i agree with your feelings about haylens absence/big post
echo 254 wrote:you don't think Haylen forgetting who replaced who should be used against Haylen?
If so, I disagree. Bringing up the first post of the topic only takes one click from any page you're on - clicking the "1" or the topic title. Saying you don't know who replaced who so you don't extend your argument to the person who replaced sounds either like laziness, which can be anti-town, or trying to avoid plotholes in your argument, which is scummy
all due respect, i disagree with you here. i dont see how not going to check to see who has replaced who is particularly suspicious in this instance. raskols been going after haylen pretty hard. she fights back because raskol is being kind of unreasonable and very aggressive - they literally have a post war where its like every other post, haylen vs raskol for a couple pages....it just doesnt seem suspicious at all that she should forget who replaced who. i agree that it
can
amount to something but i dont see that here at all and i find it a little suspicious of you to go with raskols point here. i feel like raskols trying to manufact this point into something when it is truly nothing right now and youre going along with it for some reason
for the record
i dont trust the wiki at all.
i am a tad suspicious of anticollie for not expounding on his last ish, especially since it seems like the situation with the logic has gotten worse. its like....dropping in to note the danger of the situation and then letting it happen is like trying to position oneself as a steward of the town and then just going to get drunk under the tree with the hot gypsy women. if youre that ill, you better spit fire or go home with your head down, you know?
at the same time. the last few pages have been pretty painstaking to follow especially given the post rapidity so an absence is kind of understood. but if you disappear for too long its gonna start seeming too suspicious
